[FireArms:Source] 1.0 out now!

I'm Jamesey wrote:
Acreta wrote:
Finray wrote:
Looks like a shit counter strike.
With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.
don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK

More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else

Acreta wrote:
Finray wrote:
Looks like a shit counter strike.
With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.

CSS has more weapons than FAS atm

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-07-24 09:29:28)

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-07-24 09:32:11

#9

I'm Jamesey: Do a Research Noob; +506|6378|Scotland!

FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
Acreta wrote:

With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.
don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK
More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else

Shit lesson, bad player.

More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay

More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.

2010-07-24 09:36:09

#10

dtacs: say that 2 my face fucker not online; +126|6080|Australia

To those considering: Its shit.

Don't even bother downloading it.

2010-07-24 09:39:28

#11

FloppY_: +1,010|6532|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

I'm Jamesey wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:

don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK
More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else
Shit lesson, bad player.

More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay

More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.

Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-07-24 09:45:27

#12

I'm Jamesey: Do a Research Noob; +506|6378|Scotland!

FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:

More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else
Shit lesson, bad player.

More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay

More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.
Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned

Yeah except all those hyper shit kiddies who think they're leet pro gamers won't be aspiring to be the next big name in the game and following good players around small servers. and playing matches and mixes they'll be on your server raging crying and bug exploiting you all day until they get bored without a competitive scene to follow and they'll download hacks and ruin the game, that'll be fun for you, won't it!

when a game's competitive scene dies, the cunt players don't move on, they stay behind and ruin casual gaming for everyone else.

2010-07-24 10:01:06

#13

FloppY_: +1,010|6532|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

I'm Jamesey wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:

Shit lesson, bad player.

More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay

More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.
Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned
Yeah except all those hyper shit kiddies who think they're leet pro gamers won't be aspiring to be the next big name in the game and following good players around small servers. and playing matches and mixes they'll be on your server raging crying and bug exploiting you all day until they get bored without a competitive scene to follow and they'll download hacks and ruin the game, that'll be fun for you, won't it!

when a game's competitive scene dies, the cunt players don't move on, they stay behind and ruin casual gaming for everyone else.

Meh, the more they hax the better... it only takes a few reports for them to get VAC banned...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-07-24 10:05:22

#14

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6716

you do realize VAC ban lists update like on a quarterly basis, right?

3-4 months of unmetred hacking is enough to destroy a fledgling game-community

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-24 10:13:40

#15

I'm Jamesey: Do a Research Noob; +506|6378|Scotland!

FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:

Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned
Yeah except all those hyper shit kiddies who think they're leet pro gamers won't be aspiring to be the next big name in the game and following good players around small servers. and playing matches and mixes they'll be on your server raging crying and bug exploiting you all day until they get bored without a competitive scene to follow and they'll download hacks and ruin the game, that'll be fun for you, won't it!

when a game's competitive scene dies, the cunt players don't move on, they stay behind and ruin casual gaming for everyone else.
Meh, the more they hax the better... it only takes a few reports for them to get VAC banned...

You're only displaying your vast amounts of online fps game ignorance ITT

2010-07-24 10:22:43

#16

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6899

floppy's just angry we kicked him out of our alien swarm game earlier, basically. He'll calm down

2010-07-24 12:42:53

#17

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6768|...

hah nice, i remember this mod for half life 1 ages ago, it was a lot of fun then

2010-07-24 16:47:08

#18

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +564|6959|Purplicious Wisconsin

I remember the old Fire Arms mod, hope this ends up just as good.

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2010-07-24 19:04:33

#19

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6768|...

War Man wrote:
I remember the old Fire Arms mod, hope this ends up just as good.

that was the first time i played a capturing points/push type fps (aside form canal zone in team fortress).

2010-07-25 01:45:57

#20

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6709|cuntshitlake

FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:

Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned
Yeah except all those hyper shit kiddies who think they're leet pro gamers won't be aspiring to be the next big name in the game and following good players around small servers. and playing matches and mixes they'll be on your server raging crying and bug exploiting you all day until they get bored without a competitive scene to follow and they'll download hacks and ruin the game, that'll be fun for you, won't it!

when a game's competitive scene dies, the cunt players don't move on, they stay behind and ruin casual gaming for everyone else.
Meh, the more they hax the better... it only takes a few reports for them to get VAC banned...

VAC does not work through reports plus it's slow and ineffective

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2010-07-25 01:56:42

#21

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6988|FUCK UBISOFT

FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
Acreta wrote:

With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.
don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK
More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else

Acreta wrote:
Finray wrote:
Looks like a shit counter strike.
With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.
CSS has more weapons than FAS atm

more weapons doesn't mean jack shit you ignorant moron.

lets take call of duty as an example of this. VCoD has very few weapons, but they are all varied. MW2 has lots of weapons. They're all the same gun with minor differences in ROF, Ammo, and model.

2010-07-25 07:00:41

#22

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6716

i miss the days of weapon-design circa: vCod/CoD2. every gun was its own beast and took a lot of practice, mastery and skill to use properly. you'd get recruited to a mid-high level team just to fulfill the role of using 1, maybe 2 weapons. nowadays in cod4-> onwards era it's all about people using the exact same gun(s) or there being literally no difference between them, anyway. even the STG/MP44 and BAR - technically the same weapon class - were entirely different weapons to use in vCoD/CoD2. weep!

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-25 07:42:09

#23

FloppY_: +1,010|6532|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Miggle wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:

don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK
More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else

Acreta wrote:
With first aid, more weapons, skills, and features.

So no, not really.
CSS has more weapons than FAS atm
more weapons doesn't mean jack shit you ignorant moron.

lets take call of duty as an example of this. VCoD has very few weapons, but they are all varied. MW2 has lots of weapons. They're all the same gun with minor differences in ROF, Ammo, and model.

My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2010-07-25 11:22:29

#24

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6988|FUCK UBISOFT

FloppY_ wrote:
Miggle wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
I'm Jamesey wrote:
don't care about the following:

first aid
skills
features

oh shit an fps game with WEAPONS, HOLD ME BACK
More Weapons > Less Weapons

This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else

CSS has more weapons than FAS atm
more weapons doesn't mean jack shit you ignorant moron.

lets take call of duty as an example of this. VCoD has very few weapons, but they are all varied. MW2 has lots of weapons. They're all the same gun with minor differences in ROF, Ammo, and model.
My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated

No, as usual you were trying to sound smart and instead sounding miserably stupid.

"More Weapons > Less Weapons" Is just completely wrong.

2010-07-25 11:24:42

#25

FloppY_: +1,010|6532|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Miggle wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
Miggle wrote:

more weapons doesn't mean jack shit you ignorant moron.

lets take call of duty as an example of this. VCoD has very few weapons, but they are all varied. MW2 has lots of weapons. They're all the same gun with minor differences in ROF, Ammo, and model.
My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated
No, as usual you were trying to sound smart and instead sounding miserably stupid.

"More Weapons > Less Weapons" Is just completely wrong.

You are an idiot...

Are you seriously trying to say that 2 > 1 is wrong?

Because > means more than... not better than... fucking idiot...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

BF2S Forums [FireArms:Source] 1.0 out now!

Finray wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Finray wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Finray wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Finray wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

Acreta wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

War Man wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Finray wrote:

Miggle wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

Acreta wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Miggle wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

I'm Jamesey wrote:

Miggle wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Board footer