> means greater than.FloppY_ wrote:
You are an idiot...Miggle wrote:
No, as usual you were trying to sound smart and instead sounding miserably stupid.FloppY_ wrote:
My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated
"More Weapons > Less Weapons" Is just completely wrong.
Are you seriously trying to say that 2 > 1 is wrong?
Because > means more than... not better than... fucking idiot...
I hope you aren't serious with this?FloppY_ wrote:
You are an idiot...Miggle wrote:
No, as usual you were trying to sound smart and instead sounding miserably stupid.FloppY_ wrote:
My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated
"More Weapons > Less Weapons" Is just completely wrong.
Are you seriously trying to say that 2 > 1 is wrong?
Because > means more than... not better than... fucking idiot...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-07-25 11:35:16)
Why state the obvious?FloppY_ wrote:
In the context above it was clearly meant as a measure of quantity, not quality... so take your cuntbag bitching somewhere else plz.. kthx...
You're seriously trying to play that? There's no reason to make a quantitative observation like that. The only reason you could have had to post that is if it was qualitative.FloppY_ wrote:
In the context above it was clearly meant as a measure of quantity, not quality... so take your cuntbag bitching somewhere else plz.. kthx...
Because miggle misread it and started beeing a faggot about it...NooBesT wrote:
Why state the obvious?FloppY_ wrote:
In the context above it was clearly meant as a measure of quantity, not quality... so take your cuntbag bitching somewhere else plz.. kthx...
Well lets see, Jamesey thought you were making a qualitative assessment, you didn't point out how he had misread it.FloppY_ wrote:
Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concernedI'm Jamesey wrote:
Shit lesson, bad player.FloppY_ wrote:
More Weapons > Less Weapons
This concludes our lesson for today.. now go bother someone else
More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay
More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.
I most certainly am not...Miggle wrote:
Well lets see, Jamesey thought you were making a qualitative assessment, you didn't point out how he had misread it.FloppY_ wrote:
Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concernedI'm Jamesey wrote:
Shit lesson, bad player.
More weapons increases the chance of casual players being frustrated at the lack of time available to learn to play with more than one or two weapons which leads to the release of an overpowered 'all round' weapon that ruins gameplay
More weapons means competitive play is limited to a lot less weapons which results in less of a competitive scene in the game which hurts it in the long run.
You're trying to change the meaning because you know you're wrong, and you're making yourself look worse. Accept it and move on.
> means more than ????????????FloppY_ wrote:
I most certainly am not...Miggle wrote:
Well lets see, Jamesey thought you were making a qualitative assessment, you didn't point out how he had misread it.FloppY_ wrote:
Less of a competitive scene is a plus as far as I am concerned
You're trying to change the meaning because you know you're wrong, and you're making yourself look worse. Accept it and move on.
now stfu you cuntbag
quoted for hilarity.FloppY_ wrote:
You are an idiot...Miggle wrote:
No, as usual you were trying to sound smart and instead sounding miserably stupid.FloppY_ wrote:
My god you idiot miggle.. I was merely pointing out the faulty fact he stated
"More Weapons > Less Weapons" Is just completely wrong.
Are you seriously trying to say that 2 > 1 is wrong?
Because > means more than... not better than... fucking idiot...