Your definition of powerful must differ from others...I have a simple 3400+ with 1 gig of RAM and a midrange video card. No lag, no crashes, no delays, no bad graphics...JahManRed wrote:
The whole front end needs re done love. New shocks, fly wheel realignment..................
No seriously the front end of this game suxs, its so buggy and slow. I have a powerful PC, it must be worse on a mid range PC.
Poll
What would you like EA/Dice to put back into the game!
| The ability to jump and shoot! | 8% | 8% - 11 | ||||
| Zero delay in going prone and shooting! | 9% | 9% - 12 | ||||
| The ability to throw C4 and Medical packs! | 33% | 33% - 41 | ||||
| All of the above! | 14% | 14% - 18 | ||||
| None of the above! | 33% | 33% - 41 | ||||
| Total: 123 | ||||||
yupJimKong wrote:
The Blackhawk.
The ability to throw C4 and Medical packs!
it's an idiotic decision to take away shooting while jumping.
in real life, there's no 'magical' barrier that blocks your finger from the trigger when you jump. you might not hit anything, but you can shoot all you want. all the 'realism' morons who bitched and moaned wanted it taken away to slow down gameplay, because it's blatantly unrealistic to not be able to jump and shoot. they wanted to make the infantry combat into 'dive to the ground and hit the trigger,' and that's a personal preference of gaming style. it's NOT more realistic.
what's unrealistic is not the ability to fire while jumping, it's the jump height [no soldier fully loaded can jump that high]. but the jump height is a decision made on gameplay, not realism [because a realistic jump height of 10 inches would be next to useless in a videogame]
a realistic solution would be to add true recoil and non-random small arms ballistics, so that guns shoot where you point instead of randomly vectoring off to the side. when you jump, the gun sways wildly and thus any shooting becomes ineffective. but if i want to jump up and down spraying bullets and not hitting anything, that should be my choice.
'realism' nazis, wake up. you have no clue what you're talking about. stop trying to make this game into a simulation when it's obviously an arcade action game.
in real life, there's no 'magical' barrier that blocks your finger from the trigger when you jump. you might not hit anything, but you can shoot all you want. all the 'realism' morons who bitched and moaned wanted it taken away to slow down gameplay, because it's blatantly unrealistic to not be able to jump and shoot. they wanted to make the infantry combat into 'dive to the ground and hit the trigger,' and that's a personal preference of gaming style. it's NOT more realistic.
what's unrealistic is not the ability to fire while jumping, it's the jump height [no soldier fully loaded can jump that high]. but the jump height is a decision made on gameplay, not realism [because a realistic jump height of 10 inches would be next to useless in a videogame]
a realistic solution would be to add true recoil and non-random small arms ballistics, so that guns shoot where you point instead of randomly vectoring off to the side. when you jump, the gun sways wildly and thus any shooting becomes ineffective. but if i want to jump up and down spraying bullets and not hitting anything, that should be my choice.
'realism' nazis, wake up. you have no clue what you're talking about. stop trying to make this game into a simulation when it's obviously an arcade action game.
Last edited by Krappyappy (2006-05-04 08:59:50)
TRUE - it is NOT REAL LIFE; it's a 3D simulation; a stylized version of reality - it's kinda realistic. It's 3D-gameplay with limitations (many being arbitrary; or due to design choices that were not completely thought through).mcgregorslo wrote:
Finnaly some good fixes!
NOBODY jumps and throws things in RL (soldiers). I guess its possible but if u have MG, SAW, or other weapon plus all ammunitio and vest and more equipment...ur just too havy to jump once ... try jumping several times this way...
Try jumping and shooting in RL with SAW... my guess is u will brake a leg not make accurate headshot..
AA should be improved even more with some radar or sth
offcourse i dont agree that games should be real in every way (its boring that way, try americas army), but some things are stupid and one of them shure is bunnyhoping or only one weapon/vehicle whoring/farming.
peace
hf
BUT - in reality I would not need to jump and shoot the SRAW/ERYX, there would not be an invisible boundary (3D game mesh) that would prohibit my natural movement. I would be able to lean out a window a few inches or move the scope foward (pass the invisible 3D-mesh boundary of the roof railing).
In game you should be able to use a strategic posistion without the 3D mesh getting in the way, but subtle movements are to complicated for the game logic and might cause in-game-lag (due to more code and therefor more CPU usage). Jumping and firing the SRAW/ERYX solved this 3D-mesh problem crudely and efficiently (without any unnecessary, complicted or subtle game-code).
I think removing jumping and shooting was a stupid change. They should have made it like sprinting: requiring stamina/and that it (jumping) uses-up stamina even faster than the in-game semi-sprint.
I think also that when you click the "enemy armor spotted" or whatever, that rose should be able to see through a fence, since we're talking about 3d mesh
I laugh when people say this . Every FPS out there has the ability to jump and shoot . If you haven't learned over the years how to deal with it , then perhaps Pokemon pinball is more up your allydankassasin42o wrote:
only noobs jump an shoot...
it should really be the other way around.jonnykill wrote:
I laugh when people say this . Every FPS out there has the ability to jump and shoot . If you haven't learned over the years how to deal with it , then perhaps Pokemon pinball is more up your allydankassasin42o wrote:
only noobs jump an shoot...
'only noobs don't know how to deal with jumping and shooting.'
guys who have been playing FPS since quake/tribes have no problem jumping and shooting.