bf2 was good for its time but it got old for me rather quick.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Poll
will there evr b a bfgame that tops the numbers and experience of bf2?
| yes | 13% | 13% - 15 | ||||
| no | 32% | 32% - 37 | ||||
| REALLY , really hope so , but not so sure | 52% | 52% - 59 | ||||
| fuck bf2 , I don't belong here | 1% | 1% - 2 | ||||
| Total: 113 | ||||||
but you also like bc2War Man wrote:
bf2 was good for its time but it got old for me rather quick.
Yes, 'cause it's fun and it has customization like 2142. I like the way they did the classes like Assault is the ammoman, Medic is the machine gunner, Engineer is anti tank and smger.thepilot91 wrote:
but you also like bc2War Man wrote:
bf2 was good for its time but it got old for me rather quick.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
and you love stargate aswell?War Man wrote:
Yes, 'cause it's fun and it has customization like 2142. I like the way they did the classes like Assault is the ammoman, Medic is the machine gunner, Engineer is anti tank and smger.thepilot91 wrote:
but you also like bc2War Man wrote:
bf2 was good for its time but it got old for me rather quick.
Sorry Wa'man smg is not a verb.
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
wait, what does stargate have to do with this?thepilot91 wrote:
and you love stargate aswell?War Man wrote:
Yes, 'cause it's fun and it has customization like 2142. I like the way they did the classes like Assault is the ammoman, Medic is the machine gunner, Engineer is anti tank and smger.thepilot91 wrote:
but you also like bc2
SMGer=SubMachine Gunner. Not a verb a noun.Blade4509 wrote:
Sorry Wa'man smg is not a verb.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
unreal and fkin awful!RTHKI wrote:
wait, what does stargate have to do with this?thepilot91 wrote:
and you love stargate aswell?War Man wrote:
Yes, 'cause it's fun and it has customization like 2142. I like the way they did the classes like Assault is the ammoman, Medic is the machine gunner, Engineer is anti tank and smger.
I like atlantis and sg 1 for the humor in it.thepilot91 wrote:
unreal and fkin awful!RTHKI wrote:
wait, what does stargate have to do with this?thepilot91 wrote:
and you love stargate aswell?
Last edited by War Man (2010-08-08 10:31:37)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
there we go , I've made my pointWar Man wrote:
I like atlantis and sg 1 for the humor in it.thepilot91 wrote:
unreal and fkin awful!RTHKI wrote:
wait, what does stargate have to do with this?
Gotta admit it was funny, now the stargate series is lame because stargate universe replaced the humor of its predecessors with drama which made me stop watching it after 4-6 episodesthepilot91 wrote:
there we go , I've made my pointWar Man wrote:
I like atlantis and sg 1 for the humor in it.thepilot91 wrote:
unreal and fkin awful!
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
SG-1 was actually fun to watch, excellent suspense.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
Last edited by pace51 (2010-08-08 19:42:41)
So the hit reg was ok to you?
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
whatever , I've always hated it... 11classes and fu she maps would be awsome , but as long as it's on console aswell there isn't gonna be any planes ...= suxx hardpace51 wrote:
SG-1 was actually fun to watch, excellent suspense.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
Well i really hope BF3 will be the ramake of BF2!
Right now im playing MW2 and i didnt knew im gonna play that one. After i played BC2 at my friend that was official a FAIL game for me. I dont bought it and nor i bought MW2. I play on cracked servers for FREE
Right now im playing MW2 and i didnt knew im gonna play that one. After i played BC2 at my friend that was official a FAIL game for me. I dont bought it and nor i bought MW2. I play on cracked servers for FREE
Related fact: BF1943 was on console, and had planes.thepilot91 wrote:
whatever , I've always hated it... 11classes and fu she maps would be awsome , but as long as it's on console aswell there isn't gonna be any planes ...= suxx hardpace51 wrote:
SG-1 was actually fun to watch, excellent suspense.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
oh...oh well then , dunno if you've played 1942 , but I did and thought the planes where quite good , and if they are just as well or better in -43 there might be a slight chance for a decent bf3GullyFoyle wrote:
Related fact: BF1943 was on console, and had planes.thepilot91 wrote:
whatever , I've always hated it... 11classes and fu she maps would be awsome , but as long as it's on console aswell there isn't gonna be any planes ...= suxx hardpace51 wrote:
SG-1 was actually fun to watch, excellent suspense.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
now the question stands : 1943 plane comparisment to 1942 ? anyone?
Yes, but seeing as jets are faster than prop planes and have guided bombs and missiles they probly might decide to forget about jets as they're either overpowered or shit or just difficult to implement for consoles. 1943 planes were fun by the way, but bombing is meh compared to 1942.GullyFoyle wrote:
Related fact: BF1943 was on console, and had planes.thepilot91 wrote:
whatever , I've always hated it... 11classes and fu she maps would be awsome , but as long as it's on console aswell there isn't gonna be any planes ...= suxx hardpace51 wrote:
SG-1 was actually fun to watch, excellent suspense.
So far, bf3's best hope is replacing bf2's graphics with beter ones, more maps, and leaving it otherwise the same.
Imagine if bf3 only had 3 classes and every map was like zatar? That'd suck. Actually, I didn;t hate zatar too much, it was pretty fun. Nice conflicts, though if you were stranded, it sucked.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Like BC2, but with GTA-sized maps.
What I want in BF3 (not going to fucking happen though)
*Destructable environment
*good hitreg
*Vehicles that don't suck
*more than 5 classes
*dedi servers
*Destructable environment
*good hitreg
*Vehicles that don't suck
*more than 5 classes
*dedi servers
I say 4 or 5 classes for next bf game.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
I don't get it why so few classes? , I mean do people actually want only 4 classes ?! I haven't heard anyone promote 4(BC2) classes over 6 (bf2) altho I know that when bf2 came out they promoted the oppertuneties with having many choices :S
No, because they probably wont allow another BF game to be modded or have LAN. So that its shelf life is limited and we go out and buy the next installment of the game. Its the way games are going unfortunately.
I think BF3 would be cool if they included civilians in multiplayer games, and if anyone kills you they get neg points, but you can still kill people with stones and punches.
Basically like a normal Battlefield version of PR civilians. Maybe I don't know if that would work out or not lol
Basically like a normal Battlefield version of PR civilians. Maybe I don't know if that would work out or not lol
lol....then you have servers full of civilians running around and nothing but neg points...how fun.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
I think BF3 would be cool if they included civilians in multiplayer games, and if anyone kills you they get neg points, but you can still kill people with stones and punches.
Basically like a normal Battlefield version of PR civilians. Maybe I don't know if that would work out or not lol
...