loubot
O' HAL naw!
+470|6970|Columbus, OH

Ilocano wrote:

loubot wrote:

for starters, lack of sammwich making skills.
That can be learned.  Prior to marrying her, my wife couldn't make squat.  Now, everything she cooks I love.  Even the steak courses I taught her, she makes better than me now.
practice makes perfect
=NHB=Shadow
hi
+322|6758|California
FAT
bucked teeth
unproportional face
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6863
*disproportionate
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Uzique wrote:

*disproportionate
Nah, Shadows' unproportional is better suited to physical attributes.  While disproportionate is quantitative.
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|7047

I want to say smoking is a turnoff for me, too. But there's a girl I know and like very much who happens to smoke. Everything else about her makes up for it though. Just a small hurdle to overcome. Totally worth it.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

mtb0minime wrote:

I want to say smoking is a turnoff for me, too. But there's a girl I know and like very much who happens to smoke. Everything else about her makes up for it though. Just a small hurdle to overcome. Totally worth it.
First off, do you smoke?  Second, have you kissed her after a smoke?
=NHB=Shadow
hi
+322|6758|California

Ilocano wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

I want to say smoking is a turnoff for me, too. But there's a girl I know and like very much who happens to smoke. Everything else about her makes up for it though. Just a small hurdle to overcome. Totally worth it.
First off, do you smoke?  Second, have you kissed her after a smoke?
toke it
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|7047

Ilocano wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

I want to say smoking is a turnoff for me, too. But there's a girl I know and like very much who happens to smoke. Everything else about her makes up for it though. Just a small hurdle to overcome. Totally worth it.
First off, do you smoke?  Second, have you kissed her after a smoke?
No, I don't.
And that's the one condition I will uphold. Do not want to make out with an ashtray, no thank you.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6846|The Twilight Zone

Ilocano wrote:

.Sup wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

Penis.
Apart from that, i'm not fussy.
some males have surgically removed theirs
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/11550 … f_Cebu.jpg
Thailand?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6863

Ilocano wrote:

Uzique wrote:

*disproportionate
Nah, Shadows' unproportional is better suited to physical attributes.  While disproportionate is quantitative.
what a load of bollocks.

unproportional isn't even a real word, it's just a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Uzique wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

Uzique wrote:

*disproportionate
Nah, Shadows' unproportional is better suited to physical attributes.  While disproportionate is quantitative.
what a load of bollocks.

unproportional isn't even a real word, it's just a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts
Works for us Americans.  You Englishmen are more picky.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

.Sup wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

.Sup wrote:

some males have surgically removed theirs
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/11550 … f_Cebu.jpg
Thailand?
Cebu, Philippines.  All you white boys wanting to come taste the women in Philippines have to really be careful.  Feel that Adams apple first before paying the bar fine.  Some of our gays are drop dead gorgeous, proven by our pageants.  BTW, same applies in Brazil.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6863

Ilocano wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Ilocano wrote:


Nah, Shadows' unproportional is better suited to physical attributes.  While disproportionate is quantitative.
what a load of bollocks.

unproportional isn't even a real word, it's just a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts
Works for us Americans.  You Englishmen are more picky.
we invented the language, ta.

anyway, appreciated if you don't tell us how to use our own language... especially when your instructs involve non-words and bullshittery
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|7125|St. Andrews / Oslo

- lack of intelligence
- lack of manners
- lack of class
- swearing
- interest i cars/guns/computer games
- lack of humour
- lack of ambition
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Uzique wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

Uzique wrote:


what a load of bollocks.

unproportional isn't even a real word, it's just a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts
Works for us Americans.  You Englishmen are more picky.
we invented the language, ta.

anyway, appreciated if you don't tell us how to use our own language... especially when your instructs involve non-words and bullshittery
What's this?
http://books.google.com/books?id=niMFAQ … mp;f=false
Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|6866|6 6 4 oh, I forget

Those goddamn long-johns they wear instead of pants.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_a-PHw7KbeZI/SKFXFcGBfGI/AAAAAAAAAqo/m97nuH0MHq0/s400/leggings.jpg
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6522|North Tonawanda, NY
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7042

Herpes.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

SenorToenails wrote:

define: unproportional
Hmmm...
Yeah.  Disproportional is the better word.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6863
ITT a clueless non-english fuck tries to argue with an englit undergraduate about an english word

finds to great success an internet search result that matches my first post exactly

"[...] a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts"
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Ultrafunkula wrote:

Those goddamn long-johns they wear instead of pants.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_a-PHw7KbeZI/S … ggings.jpg
Serious?  Must be a cultural thing for me.  But I prefer these leggings on women than pants.  Assuming they wear them well, of course.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7059

Uzique wrote:

ITT a clueless non-english fuck tries to argue with an englit undergraduate about an english word

finds to great success an internet search result that matches my first post exactly

"[...] a 'word' understood logically because of its constituent grammatical parts"
Pfft!!!

I'll take my flashlight to your torch, thank you very much.
liquidat0r
wtf.
+2,223|7020|UK
reading through the thread the main thing that sticks out is smoking
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,745|7129|Cinncinatti

liquidat0r wrote:

reading through the thread the main thing that sticks out is smoking
well ugly is a given
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6354|Places 'n such

liquidat0r wrote:

reading through the thread the main thing that sticks out is smoking
Dont get why it bothers people, never seen it as a factor myself.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard