BF2S Forums " The Rape Tree " A reason for an Anti Illegal Immigration view.

Cybargs wrote:

source

Just how stupid are you, Can you actually read ?

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

God dammit you frigginn libs are so contrary cantankerous and argumentative you oppose just to oppose. Talk about KNEE JERK. Go argue with a stop sign if you have nothing worth while to say !

you say liberal like it's a bad thing. founding fathers were liberal oh noes.

Ugh, why are you reiterating fox oritentated drivel so much? If you want people to post on topic then stick to one topic in your original post and not a branch of seperate complaints and jabs. You repeatedly talking about fox doesn't mean anything whatsoever, it is still considered (and I'll put this in grammar you may understand) to be a Sub Par, massively bias, utterly piss poor media network that is Misinforming generations of Americans and should be shunned along with other shit attempts at journalism including those far left.

Comprende?

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

God dammit you frigginn libs are so contrary cantankerous and argumentative you oppose just to oppose. Talk about KNEE JERK. Go argue with a stop sign if you have nothing worth while to say !

you say liberal like it's a bad thing. founding fathers were liberal oh noes.

Time for you to crack a book or two on " The Founding Fathers ". The Dems have moved so far left J.F.K. would be a hard core Neo Con By today's standards.

See post 3

NYU lel

I don't really get the point of this thread even with an OP. it's one of those oh this shit is bad we should do something about it type.

The source is actually written all over the OP (Fox News). All that's missing is a link to the article, which is still needed. And the founding fathers did have liberal viewpoints by those days' standards, which for obvious [antiquated definition] reasons invalidates the "if you hate liberals, you hate a free America" argument I've seen pop up here and there on the net in relation to current politics.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

" The Rape Tree " Or - Another reason for a Anti Illegal Immigration point of view.

After all the " FOX omg ! " posts here. I figured I owed FOX a closer look. What I heard on FOX radio today was.

At illegal border crossing sites, It is expected that the younger atractive women are to give up sex with the men who organize the crossings. If they don't " give it up " they are Raped ! Their Underwear is removed and thrown up into the branches of the " Rape Tree ".

I have seen similar things at Ski Resorts were woman drop there lingerie into the branches of a tree from the Ski lift. I imagine the women who did this were young and attractive and more enthusiastic than the women trying to sneak across our southern border.

So just open up the border and let everyone across = no more rape.

also:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

I believe the word  - Rape -  deserves to be capitalized. If it hurts your eyes, you need toughen up some.
If you think my grammar is bad, read up and down a few posts.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

contrary cantankerous and argumentative you oppose just to oppose.

Can you actually structure a cohesive argument? Every post seems to just develop into rants, opinion and speculation. It's painful to read. How do you expect people to agree with you if you don't communicate your ideas?
The " FOX omg ! " posts are because half the stuff they come up with is scaremongering shite, all news is interpreted in different, biased, ways. Why don't you have a look for a source or two and get some different viewpoints?

jord wrote:

Ugh, why are you reiterating fox oritentated drivel so much? If you want people to post on topic then stick to one topic in your original post and not a branch of seperate complaints and jabs. You repeatedly talking about fox doesn't mean anything whatsoever, it is still considered (and I'll put this in grammar you may understand) to be a Sub Par, massively bias, utterly piss poor media network that is Misinforming generations of Americans and should be shunned along with other shit attempts at journalism including those far left.

Comprende?

I was right again. The thread has stayed in tune with your opening post, which rambles on about something different every other sentance.

One subject, quoted and sourced with a link and an ON TOPIC personal opinion or argument that doesn't descend into incohesive rants and speculation written in somewhat of a standardized format which isn't all over the place and filled with copious amounts of bb code... PLEASE.

Last edited by jord (2010-09-27 09:51:31)

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

Do we really need another " How is the media biased "  thread? The Left always gets its ass handed to it in those.

You sort of set the stage in your OP:

After all the " FOX omg ! " posts here. I figured I owed FOX a closer look. What I heard on FOX radio today was.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

So just open up the border and let everyone across = no more rape.

How did you ever jump to this conclusion ? Why not try harder to close it  to criminal trafficing.
Further, when it is just your opinion, state it so.

Do we really need another " How is the media biased "  thread? The Left always gets its ass handed to it in those.

ofc the media is biased to the left, except FOX, which is biased to the right...

nothing to see here, move along people.

anyways, this rape probably accounts for MUCH fewer numbers than rape in other situations........

so yeah righteousness fail moar.

jord wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

presidentsheep wrote:

So just open up the border and let everyone across = no more rape.

How did you ever jump to this conclusion ? Why not try harder to close it  to criminal trafficking.
Further, when it is just your opinion, state it so.

Do we really need another " How is the media biased "  thread? The Left always gets its ass handed to it in those.

You can't complain about something you've started. I'm not left but repeating "the left always loses" doesn't make it true. Indeed there are very low quality and very biased far left news sources but they aren't talked about, used or blindly defended as much as fox is. It's the Internet, it isn't hard to find a half decent source. And until you can quote a good source and provide a link to it as well as present a coherent and concise argument then your threads are always going to start downhill and continue in that direction.

That or I will be followed by a herd of trolling bleeting sheep, Who like to repeat anything they hear from their cronies. I don't think you could be serious.

I didn't " present an argument. " or for that matter try to. I brought a horrific crime and injustice to light that I had been unaware of.

It is a crime being perpetrated by Foreign Criminals and it is being done on U.S. soil. This makes it our responsibility* not Mexico's. I illustrated it ( to anyone who has ever been skiing at least. ) Argumentative and cantankerous antis used it as a forum to attack any point of view or observation I make. They are small minded and pitiful. If I said " colon cancer is bad news ! " they'd have something positive to say about Colon cancer and then check in with comments like - " fail "-" pwned lol " and other mindless thoughts that make timid people so comfortable in a group. I may be wrong but I believe you are a bit afraid to recognize this as the real problem for fear of drawing the attention of 25 nipping poodles.

* people from say ~ Australia are exempt of course.

Nuh, but I can close this thread.

If this had been started in Everything Else, you would have a valid point in it staying open.  But let's try to make DST a place where we provide a source(even if the source is debatable...debate it).