http://mobile.latimes.com/wap/news/text … tle=Nation
I guess you have to know what you're talking about if you want to criticize religion...
I guess you have to know what you're talking about if you want to criticize religion...
yup...JohnG@lt wrote:
This is true. I can't tell you how many believers I've had to correct over the years. The most common mistake is believing that Catholics are somehow a religion apart. If you ain't Catholic and you ain't Orthodox, you're Protestant. You all worship the same god and read out of the same book. This is most common among people who define themselves as Christian without a denomination attached. Southern style.
Laziness plays a role too, predictably.Spark wrote:
More likely they just don't bother, since they've had it from childhood.
Bacteria resisting antibiotics anyone?But I also find it ironic that atheists and agnostics score the highest in their knowledge of religion because their supposed education and thoughtful reflection, yet their beliefs are actually the most illogical of them all. At least the religions acknowledge the obvious that some kind God or Supreme Being had to place them and everything else here. That is they can't get here by themselves.
Atheists and agnostics however consider themselves enlightened and love to label their beliefs as scientific, when nothing could be further from the truth.
To consider briefly:
Something comes from nothing?
Order springs from chaos without an intelligent force to give it order?
Intelligence comes from unintelligence?
Random forces can do useful work without intelligent control?
Matter spontaneously improves upon itself?
Life comes from non-life?
Genetic mutation is the alleged primary engine which drives the evolutionary process in living beings when scientific evidence shows that virtually all mutations are harmful and dangerous?
The list of absurdities are endless.
So sorry, but atheists and agnostics have simply jumped from one circus into an even worst one, in spite of all their education and supposedly "careful reflection" on matters.
Whenever I read something like that it genuinely sounds silly to me. As if the author were doing it for shits and giggles.Trotskygrad wrote:
lol @ this postBacteria resisting antibiotics anyone?But I also find it ironic that atheists and agnostics score the highest in their knowledge of religion because their supposed education and thoughtful reflection, yet their beliefs are actually the most illogical of them all. At least the religions acknowledge the obvious that some kind God or Supreme Being had to place them and everything else here. That is they can't get here by themselves.
Atheists and agnostics however consider themselves enlightened and love to label their beliefs as scientific, when nothing could be further from the truth.
To consider briefly:
Something comes from nothing?
Order springs from chaos without an intelligent force to give it order?
Intelligence comes from unintelligence?
Random forces can do useful work without intelligent control?
Matter spontaneously improves upon itself?
Life comes from non-life?
Genetic mutation is the alleged primary engine which drives the evolutionary process in living beings when scientific evidence shows that virtually all mutations are harmful and dangerous?
The list of absurdities are endless.
So sorry, but atheists and agnostics have simply jumped from one circus into an even worst one, in spite of all their education and supposedly "careful reflection" on matters.
that's almost as bad as one guy who was talking about how "games in which crouching makes you more accurate is retarded.. How does bending your knee magically make your gun more accurate?"JohnG@lt wrote:
I'm surprised he didn't add "Being unable to describe what salt tastes like" to his list.
because they're both non-believers?jord wrote:
Why the guy has grouped atheists and agnostics together is beyond me. What a tool.h
Sss
Last edited by Trotskygrad (2010-09-28 06:39:20)
It's because it's on Fox News' frontpage. All the religious are trying to prove they are better than atheistsTrotskygrad wrote:
because they're both non-believers?jord wrote:
Why the guy has grouped atheists and agnostics together is beyond me. What a tool.h
Sss
EDIT: yeah the quiz is laggy as shit
Not necessarily, those examples he's given don't apply for many agnostics. Meh.Trotskygrad wrote:
because they're both non-believers?jord wrote:
Why the guy has grouped atheists and agnostics together is beyond me. What a tool.h
Sss
EDIT: yeah the quiz is laggy as shit
I can just imagine such people jamming chloroquine down a dying guy's throat yelling "DAMNIT WHY WON'T IT WORK"Trotskygrad wrote:
lol @ this postBacteria resisting antibiotics anyone?But I also find it ironic that atheists and agnostics score the highest in their knowledge of religion because their supposed education and thoughtful reflection, yet their beliefs are actually the most illogical of them all. At least the religions acknowledge the obvious that some kind God or Supreme Being had to place them and everything else here. That is they can't get here by themselves.
Atheists and agnostics however consider themselves enlightened and love to label their beliefs as scientific, when nothing could be further from the truth.
To consider briefly:
Something comes from nothing?
Order springs from chaos without an intelligent force to give it order?
Intelligence comes from unintelligence?
Random forces can do useful work without intelligent control?
Matter spontaneously improves upon itself?
Life comes from non-life?
Genetic mutation is the alleged primary engine which drives the evolutionary process in living beings when scientific evidence shows that virtually all mutations are harmful and dangerous?
The list of absurdities are endless.
So sorry, but atheists and agnostics have simply jumped from one circus into an even worst one, in spite of all their education and supposedly "careful reflection" on matters.
Last edited by Spark (2010-09-28 07:08:10)
It's definitely American-centric, yeah.jord wrote:
I know few of them, I put that down to some of the questions being aimed at Americans and never really reading up on religion anyway.
Turquoise wrote:
I got 12 out of 15.
I missed the Jewish Sabbath one, the blood and flesh one, and the last one.
I'm not sure if that makes me better or worse than believers on average.
looks like a fairly standard bell/gaussian curve tbh.JohnG@lt wrote:
http://features.pewforum.org/quiz/us-re … ram-15.gifTurquoise wrote:
I got 12 out of 15.
I missed the Jewish Sabbath one, the blood and flesh one, and the last one.
I'm not sure if that makes me better or worse than believers on average.
Here's the breakdown.
Filter blocked it.. what's the rub?JohnG@lt wrote:
http://features.pewforum.org/quiz/us-re … ram-15.gifTurquoise wrote:
I got 12 out of 15.
I missed the Jewish Sabbath one, the blood and flesh one, and the last one.
I'm not sure if that makes me better or worse than believers on average.
Here's the breakdown.