forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3333333#p3333333Turquoise wrote:
Isn't Danish similar to German?
Nice get.
Last edited by Finray (2010-09-29 12:39:16)

forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3333333#p3333333Turquoise wrote:
Isn't Danish similar to German?
Last edited by Finray (2010-09-29 12:39:16)
Danish and norwegian are very similar, so much so that we can talk to eachother using our seperate languages and still understand most of it...Turquoise wrote:
Isn't Danish similar to German?FloppY_ wrote:
I live in Denmark and if it wasn't for the language I'd consider germany..Hunter/Jumper wrote:
What would be your number one choice and where do you live ? Don't worry I wont move there.
I'm kinda leaning towards Sweden atm tho'... I need to do more thorough research however...
I like cars :p
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-09-29 12:54:22)
Fucken FOB's.Cybargs wrote:
um no. They would prefer to LIVE in canada. Immigrate doesn't mean grab a plane and fuck off to another country.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
I thought it was because they can then cross the border into the USA. Is this not the case. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Could be my chauvinism. As for Australia New Zealand. I am thoroughly uninformed as to there immigration laws and policies or stats.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if we're comparing countries by immigrants per capita, Canada is actually at the top of the list.
Australia has a huge immigration population recently after they removed teh white australia policy.
Immigration IIRC is about half our population growth. Good thing too or we would be struggling to not be sub-replacement and we would be facing the mother of all aging population/skill shortage crises (although we still have those issues anyway).Turquoise wrote:
Interesting... I didn't realize our total was quite that large. That first chart isn't representative of annual immigration (otherwise, we'd be growing at a ridiculous rate), but it is interesting to see what the total is among the population cumulatively.RDMC wrote:
Indeed you have the most immigrants and by far too.Turquoise wrote:
Pretty much. We do attract a lot of people, but so do many other prosperous countries. Plus, restrictions on immigration within each country muddle the measure of desire to immigrate.
Part of why America has so many immigrants is because we allow more of them in than many other countries. If I'm not mistaken, we actually allow more immigrants in on an annual basis than any other country. However, as Canada shows, there are some countries that allow more immigrants in than us as compared to their total populations.
It's hard to say exactly how immigration per capita would look worldwide if every country was completely open to all immigration. I think America would still be in the top 10 or top 5, but I don't know if we'd be at the very top. We probably would still be at the top in terms of total immigration though.
However, you do not rank first in terms of percentage.
The second chart isn't annual in percentage either, but again, seeing the cumulative percentage is interesting as well. I guess when I was thinking of Canada, I was recollecting a chart showing annual immigration for OECD countries.
I had totally forgotten just how much immigration is happening in the UAE. Granted, some of that just involves migrant labor that is temporary. I didn't realize Switzerland and Australia had so many immigrants too.
Last edited by Spark (2010-09-29 20:58:50)
Your sir are correct. As long as there is a demand for the shit they make they'll continue to make it and profit from it. When you go to Wal-mart or Target and buy shit products from China then you're supporting the shit Products from China and perpetuating all of this.Dilbert_X wrote:
And do you have any idea how well educated, ingenious and industrious their hard core of engineers is?
That they are shipping rubbish to the US and you're buying it in preference to your own products is by the by.
ftw means what, ( for the win ) ?Harmor wrote:
Your sir are correct. As long as there is a demand for the shit they make they'll continue to make it and profit from it. When you go to Wal-mart or Target and buy shit products from China then you're supporting the shit Products from China and perpetuating all of this.Dilbert_X wrote:
And do you have any idea how well educated, ingenious and industrious their hard core of engineers is?
That they are shipping rubbish to the US and you're buying it in preference to your own products is by the by.
They couldn't make shit products from China is no one bought them now could they?
Last edited by jord (2010-09-30 05:02:23)
I wont buy any chinese product, sorry I have been burned to many times. They are even recalling children's products made with lead paint. This would have lead to another generation of democrats, perhaps that was their plan ? If youjord wrote:
The quality isn't that bad that anyone is going to boycott all Chinese products. I don't look where a product is made before I buy it, there's not really any reason to.
and feel" don't look where a product is made before I buy it,"
that's your prerogative. have at it. I would avoid chinese smoke detectors and life jackets !" there's not really any reason to. "
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-30 06:01:04)
It depends on the product. I don't care if my alarm clock is made in China.jord wrote:
The quality isn't that bad that anyone is going to boycott all Chinese products. I don't look where a product is made before I buy it, there's not really any reason to.
Just because something isn't dangerous still doesn't imply reliability.jord wrote:
I should add, I think the majority of the "checking" should be, and is, done by import authorities and the retailer itself. They may have low standards, but there are few dangerously low standards that get through here.
Last edited by Turquoise (2010-09-30 07:00:00)
Well there's thousands of examples both for and against that generalization, as a general rule to try to adhear to I suppose i'd agree. I wouldn't go out of my way or inconveniance myself just to not buy from China/India/Taiwan/Pakistan/etc. I guess electronics is an example of a "product that you can depend on in the long term" not from America/Europe/etc. Again there are examples against this like there are every sweeping statment.Turquoise wrote:
Just because something isn't dangerous still doesn't imply reliability.jord wrote:
I should add, I think the majority of the "checking" should be, and is, done by import authorities and the retailer itself. They may have low standards, but there are few dangerously low standards that get through here.
I would agree that most Chinese goods are safe for consumption, but any product that you depend on for the long term for important purposes should probably be made in America, Canada, Europe, Australia, or Japan.
disclaimer; not including genocidal regimes.FatherTed wrote:
basically if you want something to work FOREVER make sure a German made it.
Yeah, but an alarm clock doesn't have an important purpose...jord wrote:
Well there's thousands of examples both for and against that generalization, as a general rule to try to adhear to I suppose i'd agree. I wouldn't go out of my way or inconveniance myself just to not buy from China/India/Taiwan/Pakistan/etc. I guess electronics is an example of a "product that you can depend on in the long term" not from America/Europe/etc. Again there are examples against this like there are every sweeping statment.Turquoise wrote:
Just because something isn't dangerous still doesn't imply reliability.jord wrote:
I should add, I think the majority of the "checking" should be, and is, done by import authorities and the retailer itself. They may have low standards, but there are few dangerously low standards that get through here.
I would agree that most Chinese goods are safe for consumption, but any product that you depend on for the long term for important purposes should probably be made in America, Canada, Europe, Australia, or Japan.
Using a word like everyone in the context of people trying to get into America is stretching it a bit ...Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Really, I think I heard this before. We will see. My bet is that ten years from now we will still be the country every one is trying to get into.Dilbert_X wrote:
Socialism wasn't 'foisted' by anyone, Americans voted for it after capitalism failed.
yes, and..Varegg wrote:
Using a word like everyone in the context of people trying to get into America is stretching it a bit ...Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Really, I think I heard this before. We will see. My bet is that ten years from now we will still be the country every one is trying to get into.Dilbert_X wrote:
Socialism wasn't 'foisted' by anyone, Americans voted for it after capitalism failed.
yes, why dont they want to go anywhere else I wonder ?Dilbert_X wrote:
By everyone he means south americans and asians.
A lot of Chinese move to Vancouver and stay there. Mississauga seems to attract a lot of South Asians. A lot of Middle Easterners move to Europe.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
yes, why dont they want to go anywhere else I wonder ?Dilbert_X wrote:
By everyone he means south americans and asians.
Who says they don't?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
yes, why dont they want to go anywhere else I wonder ?Dilbert_X wrote:
By everyone he means south americans and asians.
Not anymore IMOCybargs wrote:
white australia m8Spark wrote:
They do anyway...