This is a bit strange... I wanted to finally test out Videora on my new X6 and see if there was a huge difference in converting videos into iPod format. I started with the H264 on the max setting with AviSynth and then with 2-pass and had problems since the videos that resulted would not be added to the iTunes library (tried everything and still didn't work). It was maxing out all 6 cores and chewed through the conversion real fast - 30 minutes for a 2 hour movie. Great stuff.
Now I'm trying it on the MPEG4 encoding to see if maybe there's a problem with the codec and now Videora doesn't max out any cores except one. The other five all sit idle, not doing a thing. Nice for multitasking, but even turning Videora up to HIGH power for CPU usage doesn't do a thing. Doing this would cripple my old Acer laptop but it doesn't faze this computer at all. Again, this is nice, but I want this thing to use all the raw power.
My question is this: Does anyone know if there is a fundamental difference between the h264 encoding and the MPEG4 in terms of CPU efficiency? I've not turned anything up in some quick Google searches so I thought I would enlist the help of BF2s in my search.
Now I'm trying it on the MPEG4 encoding to see if maybe there's a problem with the codec and now Videora doesn't max out any cores except one. The other five all sit idle, not doing a thing. Nice for multitasking, but even turning Videora up to HIGH power for CPU usage doesn't do a thing. Doing this would cripple my old Acer laptop but it doesn't faze this computer at all. Again, this is nice, but I want this thing to use all the raw power.
My question is this: Does anyone know if there is a fundamental difference between the h264 encoding and the MPEG4 in terms of CPU efficiency? I've not turned anything up in some quick Google searches so I thought I would enlist the help of BF2s in my search.