That would have been more acceptable .. I'm just tired of half ass reporting
Xbone Stormsurgezz
A guy I know from school sent the BBC his footage from it and it's his footage they have been using. Apparently ABC wanted to use it and were gonna pay him for it too.
That's probably why people moan about using Fox News as a source. I agree, having read back through the article again it does use some very tabloid-y language.Kmar wrote:
That would have been more acceptable .. I'm just tired of half ass reporting
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7081
Protesting to save art?
what are you on about?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
It's a syndicated AP article. You don't even want to see how Fox or MSNBC does with world news. I'm not just talking about a slant. .. it is just really.ffing.bad.journalism.ghettoperson wrote:
That's probably why people moan about using Fox News as a source. I agree, having read back through the article again it does use some very tabloid-y language.Kmar wrote:
That would have been more acceptable .. I'm just tired of half ass reporting
Xbone Stormsurgezz
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7081
Not like the government can really stop someone from creating art.Uzique wrote:
what are you on about?
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
meh, I think we're talking about 2 different things here. I'm looking that the Boston Globe's photoblog, and you're talking about some different source...ghettoperson wrote:
Oh I see what you mean. Well I've seen other photos of shit being thrown at the car and a window being broken so I guess whilst I have seen dramatic(ish) photos of it, they didn't bother to include any in the article, which seems slightly dumb of them.Kmar wrote:
I'm talking about saving the prince. I thought that was obvious.
ghetto and company, they lead in with an article "protesters attack the princes is car" and then transition to other photos related to the event, but not the actual scene. It's really disheartening that you guys are apparently oblivious to it. How are the "dramatic" pictures specifically related to this topic, or the article headline?
Just to be clearThe article should only include images related to the specific topic they are reporting on. It might seem petty to you, but the subtle inclusion of more violent images is done for one reason .. to create another story. That is not journalism.These are the dramatic images captured by an Associated Press photographer ->as student protesters<- vented their anger on the most elite, and supposedly well-protected, of targets -- a car containing the heir to the British throne and his consort, the Duchess of Cornwall.
fail.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7081
Uzique wrote:
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
They have money to get facial surgery but not pay for college? pfffSuperior Mind wrote:
http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/i … tests3.jpgUzique wrote:
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
niceSuperior Mind wrote:
http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/i … tests3.jpgUzique wrote:
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
they're clearly talking about funding for the arts (and the humanities, sciences, and all other departments, generally)Superior Mind wrote:
http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/i … tests3.jpgUzique wrote:
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
they're clearly just arts students bothered by the fact that a banking crisis is affecting their department, financially
nobody is saying you can't make art anymore because of the financial crisis / budget / tuition fee changes, rofl
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Jug Ears can go die as far as I'm concerned.
Fuck Israel
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7081
No, you're wrong. They are protesting that banks are burning paintings and crippling musicians.Uzique wrote:
they're clearly talking about funding for the arts (and the humanities, sciences, and all other departments, generally)Superior Mind wrote:
http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/i … tests3.jpgUzique wrote:
what are you talking about art for? what the fuck?
they're clearly just arts students bothered by the fact that a banking crisis is affecting their department, financially
nobody is saying you can't make art anymore because of the financial crisis / budget / tuition fee changes, rofl