conspiracy?Lotta_Drool wrote:
mods keep messing with my account and it glitches out. I think they are editing my posts.
No Lotta, there is a bug with gibson. Quoting large articles seems to cause posts to be stripped. Has happened to me a few times also.
A high school friend of Loughner, Caitie Parker, has given a detailed account of his personality and background on her Twitter page over the past few days. According to Parker, Loughner had "a lot of friends until he got alcohol poisoning in
wholly crap, meh, it is a conspiracy!!!!!
try this quote:
She described him as "left wing" and "quite liberal" and "oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy." Parker described him as a "pot head" who was into rock music, though she hadn't seen him since 2007.
"I think he slowly descended in a psychotic break. Something in him snapped. He wasn't always like this," she wrote.
try this quote:
She described him as "left wing" and "quite liberal" and "oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy." Parker described him as a "pot head" who was into rock music, though she hadn't seen him since 2007.
"I think he slowly descended in a psychotic break. Something in him snapped. He wasn't always like this," she wrote.
Any motives yet? I haven't looked into this much.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Given his mental instability, there is a chance that his habitual pot use caused him to experience schizophrenia. In the majority of pot users, this doesn't happen, but there are some people who experience schizophrenic symptoms from marijuana.
Either way, Jared also listed a Tea Party group on one of his website pages before it got taken down.
Again, Jared seems attracted more to radicalism than anything else.
Either way, Jared also listed a Tea Party group on one of his website pages before it got taken down.
Again, Jared seems attracted more to radicalism than anything else.
what is the gibson? But yeah, it kept excluding my post after about half way through my cut and paste quote. How frustrating.AussieReaper wrote:
No Lotta, there is a bug with gibson. Quoting large articles seems to cause posts to be stripped. Has happened to me a few times also.
Gibson is the server.
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
...
Radical Pot Head Liberal is what I describe 70% of this forum as. I long for the days when Jared was just some fat guy that ate at Subway.Turquoise wrote:
Given his mental instability, there is a chance that his habitual pot use caused him to experience schizophrenia. In the majority of pot users, this doesn't happen, but there are some people who experience schizophrenic symptoms from marijuana.
Either way, Jared also listed a Tea Party group on one of his website pages before it got taken down.
Again, Jared seems attracted more to radicalism than anything else.
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?tuckergustav wrote:
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
just saying.
lol... Well, I have to admit that I was thinking of the Subway guy too. Most people on this forum aren't radical though. Of those who are radical, we seem to have about an equal spread of left, right, and libertarian.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Radical Pot Head Liberal is what I describe 70% of this forum as. I long for the days when Jared was just some fat guy that ate at Subway.
Someone insane easily could. In fact, an insane person could simultaneously fit those descriptions.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?tuckergustav wrote:
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
just saying.
i enjoyed my first 314 days as a registered member here . . .Lotta_Drool wrote:
Radical Pot Head Liberal is what I describe 70% of this forum as. I long for the days when Jared was just some fat guy that ate at Subway.
That is IF that is really what he was to begin with. When somebody gains popularity, it seems that people come out of the woodwork to claim some close and personal friendship with them. Plus, to a dumb high school girl, the fact that he smoked pot and hated authority may have made her think he was "liberal".Lotta_Drool wrote:
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?tuckergustav wrote:
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
just saying.
...
Good point, but makes it harder to assign political blame.Turquoise wrote:
Someone insane easily could. In fact, an insane person could simultaneously fit those descriptions.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?tuckergustav wrote:
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
just saying.
To the Dems he was a Palin supporting Tea Party Gun Nut that listened to Beck.
To the Rupublicans he was a just a nutter.
To me I like the Idea of him being a Liberal Nutter reading Nazi Socialistic stuff because that would make the liberal machine eat crow.
I don't take sides in the dem vs repub thing, this is what I am seeing though.
This^tuckergustav wrote:
That is IF that is really what he was to begin with. When somebody gains popularity, it seems that people come out of the woodwork to claim some close and personal friendship with them. Plus, to a dumb high school girl, the fact that he smoked pot and hated authority may have made her think he was "liberal".Lotta_Drool wrote:
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?tuckergustav wrote:
People that I knew in high school that haven't seen me in 4 years would not be considered reliable in defining my political beliefs...just saying.
There is a lot of speculation surrounding this event. Nobody KNOWS anything about this for sure because the media is throwing out stories as soon as they get anything in order to possibly be the first to break a big and important story.
just saying.
Probably more reliable to go on what he had posted on his sites, that some girl that may or may not have been close to him as a teenager. But if he was a full on nutter, do you think he even knew what his beliefs were?
How about...Just being sad that some lunatic murdered a bunch of innocent people? Who cares why he did it?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Good point, but makes it harder to assign political blame.Turquoise wrote:
Someone insane easily could. In fact, an insane person could simultaneously fit those descriptions.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Can a person really change from a Radical Pothead Liberal to an Insane Gun Crazed Conservative in 4 years though?
just saying.
To the Dems he was a Palin supporting Tea Party Gun Nut that listened to Beck.
To the Rupublicans he was a just a nutter.
To me I like the Idea of him being a Liberal Nutter reading Nazi Socialistic stuff because that would make the liberal machine eat crow.
I don't take sides in the dem vs repub thing, this is what I am seeing though.
...
-So I guess he didn't need a bomb now did he -as everyone else was unarmed.Lotta_Drool wrote:
People didn't " Run and Pray ", a lady tried to stop him during a reload and then he was tackled when the gun wouldn't fire with a different clip.
Where is that clip from the school board meeting. Was the hand-bag chick a Republican or Democrat? Who gives a shit, it was some chick that maned up while trying to maintain bladder control.
And for the record, many " liberals " support gun rights just like the Congressman that died.
I would agree that perhaps more gun toters would be at a Republican Rally, I disagree with the " they don't carry guns and this is why they got shot up" stupidity. Hell, the guy could have parked a car bomb if he wanted, and blew lowing and your stupid asses up with your guns.
What the shit are you on about? People didn't run and pray?
I've been saying for years as doing fire drill shit that when it all boils down people will run mad. Some heroes will knock over that old lady to get away and some people you'd never expect will turn around and go back in. Good for the lady she had an opportunity and took advantage of it.
-Er no, liberals usually don't support gun rights.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Are you really sad? Would you not want to talk about it if he was a Republican with ties to Rush Limbaugh?tuckergustav wrote:
How about...Just being sad that some lunatic murdered a bunch of innocent people? Who cares why he did it?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Good point, but makes it harder to assign political blame.Turquoise wrote:
Someone insane easily could. In fact, an insane person could simultaneously fit those descriptions.
To the Dems he was a Palin supporting Tea Party Gun Nut that listened to Beck.
To the Rupublicans he was a just a nutter.
To me I like the Idea of him being a Liberal Nutter reading Nazi Socialistic stuff because that would make the liberal machine eat crow.
I don't take sides in the dem vs repub thing, this is what I am seeing though.
Personally I am not sad and the only compelling thing about this story is how the Democrats spun it right from the get go. Well, I was sad about people dying for about the first 45 seconds and then read about the 3rd story assigning blame to Republicans/Tea Party/Beck and I became fasinated by the liberal mindset and blame gameage.
Woah now.. Obama told us to not jump to any conclusions and condemn others when the FT. Hood dick wad went all jihad.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Are you really sad? Would you not want to talk about it if he was a Republican with ties to Rush Limbaugh?tuckergustav wrote:
How about...Just being sad that some lunatic murdered a bunch of innocent people? Who cares why he did it?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Good point, but makes it harder to assign political blame.
To the Dems he was a Palin supporting Tea Party Gun Nut that listened to Beck.
To the Rupublicans he was a just a nutter.
To me I like the Idea of him being a Liberal Nutter reading Nazi Socialistic stuff because that would make the liberal machine eat crow.
I don't take sides in the dem vs repub thing, this is what I am seeing though.
Personally I am not sad and the only compelling thing about this story is how the Democrats spun it right from the get go. Well, I was sad about people dying for about the first 45 seconds and then read about the 3rd story assigning blame to Republicans/Tea Party/Beck and I became fasinated by the liberal mindset and blame gameage.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
The "Run and Pray" was from the post you kudo'd Lowing on. You know, it is what Democrats do while waiting to be rescued by Republicans.DBBrinson1 wrote:
-So I guess he didn't need a bomb now did he -as everyone else was unarmed.Lotta_Drool wrote:
People didn't " Run and Pray ", a lady tried to stop him during a reload and then he was tackled when the gun wouldn't fire with a different clip.
Where is that clip from the school board meeting. Was the hand-bag chick a Republican or Democrat? Who gives a shit, it was some chick that maned up while trying to maintain bladder control.
And for the record, many " liberals " support gun rights just like the Congressman that died.
I would agree that perhaps more gun toters would be at a Republican Rally, I disagree with the " they don't carry guns and this is why they got shot up" stupidity. Hell, the guy could have parked a car bomb if he wanted, and blew lowing and your stupid asses up with your guns.
What the shit are you on about? People didn't run and pray?
I've been saying for years as doing fire drill shit that when it all boils down people will run mad. Some heroes will knock over that old lady to get away and some people you'd never expect will turn around and go back in. Good for the lady she had an opportunity and took advantage of it.
-Er no, liberals usually don't support gun rights.
Yes. I am sad. I think it is sad that people are more interested in using this for their own political gain. I don't jump on the right/left blame bandwagon, so you can't play that card with me. I think it is tragic that the human factor in these stories is lost to the highly controversial political issues just so some fat man in a suit can make a shitload of money by selling toothpaste ads on fox/cnn/msnbc.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Are you really sad? Would you not want to talk about it if he was a Republican with ties to Rush Limbaugh?tuckergustav wrote:
How about...Just being sad that some lunatic murdered a bunch of innocent people? Who cares why he did it?Lotta_Drool wrote:
Good point, but makes it harder to assign political blame.
To the Dems he was a Palin supporting Tea Party Gun Nut that listened to Beck.
To the Rupublicans he was a just a nutter.
To me I like the Idea of him being a Liberal Nutter reading Nazi Socialistic stuff because that would make the liberal machine eat crow.
I don't take sides in the dem vs repub thing, this is what I am seeing though.
Personally I am not sad and the only compelling thing about this story is how the Democrats spun it right from the get go. Well, I was sad about people dying for about the first 45 seconds and then read about the 3rd story assigning blame to Republicans/Tea Party/Beck and I became fasinated by the liberal mindset and blame gameage.
...
Funny shit right there. I like that.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Woah now.. Obama told us to not jump to any conclusions and condemn others when the FT. Hood dick wad went all jihad.
Well, if you get over the sadness you can become outraged like me at the people who started assigning the political blame and piss on the people for doing it. Especially when the people doing were the Victims supporters.tuckergustav wrote:
Yes. I am sad. I think it is sad that people are more interested in using this for their own political gain. I don't jump on the right/left blame bandwagon, so you can't play that card with me. I think it is tragic that the human factor in these stories is lost to the highly controversial political issues just so some fat man in a suit can make a shitload of money by selling toothpaste ads on fox/cnn/msnbc.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Are you really sad? Would you not want to talk about it if he was a Republican with ties to Rush Limbaugh?tuckergustav wrote:
How about...Just being sad that some lunatic murdered a bunch of innocent people? Who cares why he did it?
Personally I am not sad and the only compelling thing about this story is how the Democrats spun it right from the get go. Well, I was sad about people dying for about the first 45 seconds and then read about the 3rd story assigning blame to Republicans/Tea Party/Beck and I became fasinated by the liberal mindset and blame gameage.
Look back through this thread.
I am pretty sure a liberal was the one who started talking about blame instead of sadness.
Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2011-01-10 15:39:55)