And yet Fortune ranks them as one of the best places to work for. /facepalm.Dilbert_X wrote:
Goldman Sachs did fuck their bonds though.Kmar wrote:
I just find it sickening that they, the Greeks, are blaming everyone but themselves. Looking through the headlines it would seem blame is all they do now.
Well if you don't want to I'm not stopping you.Ilocano wrote:
So, what's the difference if Iowing and I are applying the same princiiples in our own country. Why should we support those individuals who choose not to better themselves? Who have not payed a dime into our society or provide anything of value?
My society however functions with these values at it's core. That is within my own society, you could define it as a sense of unity of sorts, I don't have such a thing in regards to Greece. Greece is a seperate entity to my society, it functions differently and, although maybe not to you - is very different from mine. An individual in my society is part of it. As long as he or she is part of the society the person in question will benefit from these values. The point of it all is to have the individual in question benefit from them and pay back into society at some point. We're not going to deprive people of medical care because they may have acted like idiots in the past.
There is still a lot that needs to be done in regards to the EU if I were to consider Greece an actual part of my society and be willing to do anything for them. Even if, it doesn't stop me from being disgusted at the way the greek government has gone through the past 3 or so decades.
Ofcourse it would be great if we could provide the same set of values for everyone on the entire planet but that is simply just not realistic nor practical. As I said, you're not spreading your constitutional values across the globe for exactly the same reason. There is nothing that binds you to people on the other side of the globe in that way.
Last edited by dayarath (2011-01-24 19:41:59)
inane little opines
Must be a very old story because hospitals have been forbidden to refuse any patient regardless of their ability to pay since the 80s.dayarath wrote:
Well if you don't want to I'm not stopping you.Ilocano wrote:
So, what's the difference if Iowing and I are applying the same princiiples in our own country. Why should we support those individuals who choose not to better themselves? Who have not payed a dime into our society or provide anything of value?
My society however functions with these values at it's core. That is within my own society, you could define it as a sense of unity of sorts, I don't have such a thing in regards to Greece. Greece is a seperate entity to my society, it functions differently and, although maybe not to you - is very different from mine. An individual in my society is part of it. As long as he or she is part of the society the person in question will benefit from these values. The point of it all is to have the individual in question benefit from them and pay back into society at some point. We're not going to deprive people of medical care because they may have acted like idiots in the past.
If memory serves me right there was a story some time ago about a homeless guy dying in front of a hospital in the US because he couldn't afford treatment, now I don't know how that makes you feel but I'd consider my society pretty fucking worthless if it couldn't provide something as basic as medical care to a citizen.
There is still a lot that needs to be done in regards to the EU if I were to consider Greece an actual part of my society and be willing to do anything for them. Even if, it doesn't stop me from being disgusted at the way the greek government has gone through the past 3 or so decades.
Ofcourse it would be great if we could provide the same set of values for everyone on the entire planet but that is simply just not realistic nor practical. As I said, you're not spreading your constitutional values across the globe for exactly the same reason. There is nothing that binds you to people on the other side of the globe in that way.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Let me just go ahead and delete that part if thats the case
inane little opines
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_ … _Labor_Actdayarath wrote:
Let me just go ahead and delete that part if thats the case
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
They blame Berlin for much of their economic ills.Ilocano wrote:
And yet Fortune ranks them as one of the best places to work for. /facepalm.Dilbert_X wrote:
Goldman Sachs did fuck their bonds though.Kmar wrote:
I just find it sickening that they, the Greeks, are blaming everyone but themselves. Looking through the headlines it would seem blame is all they do now.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
By the way, how are your hospitals not going bankrupt by the bushes if they're not allowed to refuse a patient?
inane little opines
Most people are honest. And the cost of care for those that aren't get passed on to the rest of us, hence our high insurance premiums.dayarath wrote:
By the way, how are your hospitals not going bankrupt by the bushes if they're not allowed to refuse a patient?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
so basically the same 'leechers and moochers' that would be living off of our socialized healthcare are doing so in pretty much the same manner in the US, except via your insurance?
inane little opines
Yes.dayarath wrote:
so basically the same 'leechers and moochers' that would be living off of our socialized healthcare are doing so in pretty much the same manner in the US, except via your insurance?
Edit - I used to get phone calls on a near weekly basis to collect a debt owed by a woman that had given the local hospital false information.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-01-24 19:53:31)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Why did I just have this entire discussion if that's the case... were doing the exact same thingJohnG@lt wrote:
Yes.
she mustve hated youJohnG@lt wrote:
Edit - I used to get phone calls on a near weekly basis to collect a debt owed by a woman that had given the local hospital false information.
inane little opines
... and this is the insanity of this argument.. no matter how you look at it.dayarath wrote:
By the way, how are your hospitals not going bankrupt by the bushes if they're not allowed to refuse a patient?
"America, did you know that even if you don't have health insurance, you can go to the hospital and they'll still treat you. You don't need health insurance, America! That's how good our system is! But NOW, they want to Federalize the health care system so that when you get sick you can just go to a hospital and they'l...l treat you. Where are we going to get money for that, America?"
Xbone Stormsurgezz
what kind of incompetent moron would break a system that works fine, you might aswell rename health insurance to "socialized healthcare" with the same result
that is like change for the sake of change.
hahahaha
that is like change for the sake of change.
hahahaha
inane little opines
You're NHS is only superficially different from our current insurance based system. You pay it via taxes, we pay it via premiums (and taxes ). We simply have the illusion of choice when it comes to health care providers. Insurance is a commodity and you essentially buy the same product no matter who you deal with. Some insurance companies have larger networks, some have better customer service, but they all provide the same basic coverage. Now, where our system differs from yours is that people have the option to pay for only what they want. If someone here doesn't want dental or optometry coverage they don't have to pay for it. If someone wants to pay more to have access to the top cutting edge oncology departments they can do that as well. We simply have more options when it comes to customizing our coverage rather than your one-size-fits-all approach. Insurance here is not that expensive. It is if you want top notch care, yes, but basically anyone who can't afford it qualifies for 'free' healthcare via medicaid anyway. If they say they can't afford care it's because their priorities are out of whack and they've misallocated their resources.dayarath wrote:
Why did I just have this entire discussion if that's the case... were doing the exact same thingJohnG@lt wrote:
Yes.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-01-24 20:04:11)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
that's basically it. obama's original plan was actually quite interesting but it quickly got mutated and mutilated to the comedy of errors that it is now.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
John i think the most European plans have the option to add coverage as well. I remember campoe once saying that he pays for a premiums service.JohnG@lt wrote:
You're NHS is only superficially different from our current insurance based system. You pay it via taxes, we pay it via premiums (and taxes ). We simply have the illusion of choice when it comes to health care providers. Insurance is a commodity and you essentially buy the same product no matter who you deal with. Some insurance companies have larger networks, some have better customer service, but they all provide the same basic coverage. Now, where our system differs from yours is that people have the option to pay for only what they want. If someone here doesn't want dental or optometry coverage they don't have to pay for it. If someone wants to pay more to have access to the top cutting edge oncology departments they can do that as well. We simply have more options when it comes to customizing our coverage rather than your one-size-fits-all approach. Insurance here is not that expensive. It is if you want top notch care, yes, but basically anyone who can't afford it qualifies for 'free' healthcare via medicaid anyway. If they say they can't afford care it's because their priorities are out of whack and they've misallocated their resources.dayarath wrote:
Why did I just have this entire discussion if that's the case... were doing the exact same thingJohnG@lt wrote:
Yes.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
assuming that the european medicare/NHSs are similar to ours, then yes it should only cover fairly basic medical stuff. other stuff you need to get private insurance.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
That is what i thought. We are comparing safety nets I think.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Dayarath what you're probably thinking of was a story where a homeless/destitute person, I think it was a woman, died on the ER floor. Hospital was overcrowded I think, she probably came in with weaker symptoms so she was at the bottom of the triage list, and when she started dying they didn't do jack shit. Digusting.

Well, I don't know what all the fuss is about then. I see the current arguments as nothing more than a philosophical resist against government takeover. There would be no net benefit over our current system if the feds were to try to implement a NHS type system. It would just mean more political influence and corruption spreading into the private sector.Kmar wrote:
John i think the most European plans have the option to add coverage as well. I remember campoe once saying that he pays for a premiums service.
Edit - Ahh, yes I do. The system would radically change because our progressive tax system would mean everyone pays different amounts for the same services whereas everyone pays (about) the same amount now. Yeah, I can't agree with that at all.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-01-24 20:31:45)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I also don't think most people know just how much is out there in the way of *free healthcare right now in the states. A lot of counties offer *free minimal health care service via *free clinics and such. Once I posted a whole bunch of links to get healthcare for *free or extremely discounted .. there were many.JohnG@lt wrote:
Well, I don't know what all the fuss is about then. I see the current arguments as nothing more than a philosophical resist against government takeover. There would be no net benefit over our current system if the feds were to try to implement a NHS type system. It would just mean more political influence and corruption spreading into the private sector.Kmar wrote:
John i think the most European plans have the option to add coverage as well. I remember campoe once saying that he pays for a premiums service.
Edit - Ahh, yes I do. The system would radically change because our progressive tax system would mean everyone pays different amounts for the same services whereas everyone pays (about) the same amount now. Yeah, I can't agree with that at all.
People do not pay about the same now John. Not even close. I shopped health insurance a year ago, and only because I shopped I brought my rate down from >$200 to <$100 a month. I found some little known about plans within major companies. My parents pay about 4 times as much as I do. That's a hell of a premium for being one generation older.
* there is no such thing as free
Xbone Stormsurgezz
So you don't think people that are more likely to use health care should pay a commensurate amount in premiums? As a smoker I pay higher premiums. I accept this and think it's warranted. I expect the same when I'm older and I reach the age of regular prostate exams and heart attacks etc.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Of course I do. But added risk and pre-existing conditions aren't always the reason for the inconsistency. As I said before it's a scam. My rate more than doubled over the course of a year for no reason. Literally. That is what prompted me to shop for a lower rate. There is no excuse for this type of behavior. Yes, thank god for a free market that allowed me to find a better RATE. The insurance companies get their money one way or another. If your rate is lower they just jack up the premium you must pay before they start paying out in benefits. I've done the math up and down the board with every major carrier. In that respect it is the same. Which pretty much adds up to price fixing.
btw, i advise staying away from insurance brokers. If you have any kind of math and reasoning skills you can do the job just as well, or in my situation, better.
btw, i advise staying away from insurance brokers. If you have any kind of math and reasoning skills you can do the job just as well, or in my situation, better.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar wrote:
Of course I do. But added risk and pre-existing conditions aren't always the reason for the inconsistency. As I said before it's a scam. My rate more than doubled over the course of a year for no reason. Literally. That is what prompted me to shop for a lower rate. There is no excuse for this type of behavior. Yes, thank god for a free market that allowed me to find a better RATE. The insurance companies get their money one way or another. If your rate is lower they just jack up the premium you must pay before they start paying out in benefits. I've done the math up and down the board with every major carrier. In that respect it is the same. Which pretty much adds up to price fixing.
btw, i advise staying away from insurance brokers. If you have any kind of math and reasoning skills you can do the job just as well, or in my situation, better.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/155858- … ns-rank-86
Just an FYI, their profit margin is lower than most other industries... It's not the health insurance companies fault your rates go up. Blame the hospitals, the nurses unions and everything else that goes into health care. All that shit gets passed on to you.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
They aren't the same, they cover everything. The only factor is the wait, if you want instant treatment you pay, usually to see exactly the same person you would have seen anyway.Spark wrote:
assuming that the european medicare/NHSs are similar to ours, then yes it should only cover fairly basic medical stuff. other stuff you need to get private insurance.
Fuck Israel