i think they didn't want to loose time, so the US had to help

jesus christ wikipedia-Sh1fty- wrote:
Well, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was created to protect Europe from the communists in the cold war if I recall correctly. Why would NATO still be around?
To answer your question, the US has the best military, so since they're basically leading the whole "Defend Europe!" organisation it should be led by a US general no?
short answer? no-Sh1fty- wrote:
Well, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was created to protect Europe from the communists in the cold war if I recall correctly. Why would NATO still be around?
To answer your question, the US has the best military, so since they're basically leading the whole "Defend Europe!" organisation it should be led by a US general no?
just me being pedantic11 Bravo wrote:
jesus these last few posts explain why i dont want to be involved
Do you literally thing the EU can't defend itself? i mean really?-Sh1fty- wrote:
Well, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was created to protect Europe from the communists in the cold war if I recall correctly. Why would NATO still be around?
To answer your question, the US has the best military, so since they're basically leading the whole "Defend Europe!" organisation it should be led by a US general no?
Actually yea, on my phone.. I missed you correcting your mistake.Bertster7 wrote:
Did you read my whole post, or just reply after reading the first sentence?Kmar wrote:
You might want to check my link again.Bertster7 wrote:
Yeah (although that is still unconfirmed), but it wasn't Gaddafi's plane, as your link stated
*edit* Actually, it doesn't state that - I remembered it wrong (someone elses link said that). But the plane belonged to the rebels.
Honestly, I think it's because Bahrain et al are attempting to counter Iranian influence, which is fine with everyone but Iran...so no action against it, as hypocritical as it looks on the surface.Jay wrote:
Hypocrite.Bertster7 wrote:
Worse has been reported by embedded journalists in Libya compared with the others, but if you're pointing out the hypocrisy of not getting involved in places like Bahrain, then I would agree.11 Bravo wrote:
its a civil war and there is propaganda on both sides.
i havent seen anything any worse than whats going on in most of those countries right now.
It's really because no one likes Gaddafi and he's in Europes backyard. All these other places are far away.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast … index.htmlManama, Bahrain (CNN) -- Security forces in Bahrain stormed the main hospital, beating doctors, and attacked demonstrators in Manama's Pearl Roundabout on Wednesday, witnesses in the Bahraini capital said. Bahraini officials deny these accounts.
Demonstrators reported hearing steady rounds of ammunition being fired while thick smoke rose from the Pearl Roundabout area. At least five helicopters whirred above the historic landmark, which has been a rallying spot for anti-government demonstrators in recent weeks.
Think this is it.FEOS wrote:
Honestly, I think it's because Bahrain et al are attempting to counter Iranian influence, which is fine with everyone but Iran...so no action against it, as hypocritical as it looks on the surface.Jay wrote:
Hypocrite.Bertster7 wrote:
Worse has been reported by embedded journalists in Libya compared with the others, but if you're pointing out the hypocrisy of not getting involved in places like Bahrain, then I would agree.
It's really because no one likes Gaddafi and he's in Europes backyard. All these other places are far away.
yeah, "enemy of my enemy is my friend"-bullshit again. how many 9/11's should happen to you before you start learning already?Spark wrote:
Think this is it.FEOS wrote:
Honestly, I think it's because Bahrain et al are attempting to counter Iranian influence, which is fine with everyone but Iran...so no action against it, as hypocritical as it looks on the surface.Jay wrote:
Hypocrite.
Back when NATO was created? Fight by themselves against the Russians? Hell no they couldn't, that's the whole point of NATO.FatherTed wrote:
Do you literally thing the EU can't defend itself? i mean really?-Sh1fty- wrote:
Well, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was created to protect Europe from the communists in the cold war if I recall correctly. Why would NATO still be around?
To answer your question, the US has the best military, so since they're basically leading the whole "Defend Europe!" organisation it should be led by a US general no?
If I wanted updates from your twitter account I would sign up for twitter. Cease and desist.menzo wrote:
Beginning tomorrow Trapani airport will be closed to all civil traffic ENAC (Italian Civil Aviation Authority) announced #odysseydawn
This means absolutely nothing to me ... Just a bunch of TLA's (ish) and numbers.menzo wrote:
BREAKING: PSYOPS is running! USAF EC-130J tail nr 00-1934 callsign STEEL 74 transmitting messages to #Libya on HF freq #OdysseeDawn
Jay wrote:
If I wanted updates from your twitter account I would sign up for twitter. Cease and desist.menzo wrote:
Beginning tomorrow Trapani airport will be closed to all civil traffic ENAC (Italian Civil Aviation Authority) announced #odysseydawn
Still means nothing. What is the significance of high frequency? Psychological operations? Transmitting messages to the whole of Libya ... what?Mekstizzle wrote:
Just that some Jet is transmitting messages on HF in Libya as part of US Psychological Operations
they are broadcasting messages from mekbunnyliquidat0r wrote:
Still means nothing. What is the significance of high frequency? Psychological operations? Transmitting messages to the whole of Libya ... what?Mekstizzle wrote:
Just that some Jet is transmitting messages on HF in Libya as part of US Psychological Operations