It's not so surprising. The only experience I have with Star Wars is playing the Lego games. Never really interested me that much tbh.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
o.O-Sh1fty- wrote:
Finally saw Star Wars for the first time.

It's not so surprising. The only experience I have with Star Wars is playing the Lego games. Never really interested me that much tbh.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
o.O-Sh1fty- wrote:
Finally saw Star Wars for the first time.
30's not that old, and I'm still 29.Finray wrote:
yr getting old, newbie, me and phil, the fresh generation, ready to take over.
friday friday, gotta get down on friday
Fantastic isn't itCC-Marley wrote:
Just watched Restrepo. 10/10 Wished it was longer.
Agreed. I found Armadillo better. Restrepo was lacking something.Sisco wrote:
Somehow Restrepo didn´t move me. I thought it wasn´t all that great
It was the way it was filmed.KuSTaV wrote:
Agreed. I found Armadillo better. Restrepo was lacking something.Sisco wrote:
Somehow Restrepo didn´t move me. I thought it wasn´t all that great
I think that was part of the concept. It portraied the impact the fighting had on the inter- and intraindividual behaviour of the unit. Yet I felt it lacked especially in that regard. Part of that comes from the limitations of the chosen technique, using no voice over or commentary. And more than once I thought what a bunch of ignorant meatheads the guys are, which according to interviews with the author I read wasn´t the goal.Kampframmer wrote:
It was the way it was filmed.KuSTaV wrote:
Agreed. I found Armadillo better. Restrepo was lacking something.Sisco wrote:
Somehow Restrepo didn´t move me. I thought it wasn´t all that great
They were too close on the soldiers and all you could see when they made contact was them shooting. In armadillo (I also found it better) you actually saw the enemy they fought.
I often have that idea with American soldiers. it works for movies, but to see them be, what almost looks as unprofessional, in a real war in a documentary just doesn't make it work.Sisco wrote:
I think that was part of the concept. It portraied the impact the fighting had on the inter- and intraindividual behaviour of the unit. Yet I felt it lacked especially in that regard. Part of that comes from the limitations of the chosen technique, using no voice over or commentary. And more than once I thought what a bunch of ignorant meatheads the guys are, which according to interviews with the author I read wasn´t the goal.Kampframmer wrote:
It was the way it was filmed.KuSTaV wrote:
Agreed. I found Armadillo better. Restrepo was lacking something.
They were too close on the soldiers and all you could see when they made contact was them shooting. In armadillo (I also found it better) you actually saw the enemy they fought.
my best friend met the evil guy that shouts YOU REBEL SCUM! in, uuh, empire strikes back?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Generational shift, I guess. Just don't knock it because of Jar Jar Binks. 4, 5 and 6 are still great.
That stuff is becoming so common nowadays. I've listend to more than one unmarried consultant talk about how they like to go to Bangkok to 'relax' and that they try to go at least a few times per year.Uzique wrote:
there were loads of him with thai lady-boys
your friend*s a rent boy?Uzique wrote:
my best friend met the evil guy that shouts YOU REBEL SCUM! in, uuh, empire strikes back?
spent the afternoon with him at his house having tea and looking through photo albums
there were loads of him with thai lady-boys
says it all