finally an englishman who isn't a fucking moron, you will be spared.PrivateVendetta wrote:
BIDMAS gives 288
If the 2 was part of the bracket operation, it would be in more brackets. Saying that is just wrong.

288 | 43% | 43% - 40 | ||||
2 | 56% | 56% - 51 | ||||
Total: 91 |
finally an englishman who isn't a fucking moron, you will be spared.PrivateVendetta wrote:
BIDMAS gives 288
If the 2 was part of the bracket operation, it would be in more brackets. Saying that is just wrong.
Jebus wrote:
Always 288, everyone who says 2 is stupid, srs.
Would have to be 48/(2(9+3)) for it to be 2.
48/2(9+3) = 288
This is the correct answer and explanation, I dont understand why there is still an argumentTrotskygrad wrote:
he's doing 48/2 first, then multiplying it by 12
any sane person will tell you 2
this is all about order of operations (sounds like a military term iknorite) and PEMDAS (parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction)
you perform the operations IN THAT ORDER
multiplication BEFORE division
@ Jebus
2(9+3) is an implied multiplication... still multiplication.
hence the correct answer is 2
/thread
No, no NO.-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
This is the correct answer and explanation, I dont understand why there is still an argumentTrotskygrad wrote:
he's doing 48/2 first, then multiplying it by 12
any sane person will tell you 2
this is all about order of operations (sounds like a military term iknorite) and PEMDAS (parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction)
you perform the operations IN THAT ORDER
multiplication BEFORE division
@ Jebus
2(9+3) is an implied multiplication... still multiplication.
hence the correct answer is 2
/thread
Except that Multiplication and Division are interchangeable as are Addition and Subtraction. Could be PEDMSA and it would mean the same thing.-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
This is the correct answer and explanation, I dont understand why there is still an argumentTrotskygrad wrote:
he's doing 48/2 first, then multiplying it by 12
any sane person will tell you 2
this is all about order of operations (sounds like a military term iknorite) and PEMDAS (parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction)
you perform the operations IN THAT ORDER
multiplication BEFORE division
@ Jebus
2(9+3) is an implied multiplication... still multiplication.
hence the correct answer is 2
/thread
Last edited by Miggle (2011-04-09 11:10:50)
soak a toepresidentsheep wrote:
Slags
Often
Have
Crabs
And
Herpes
'Til
Old
Age
Ain't that the fucking truth...burnzz wrote:
fuck, you can post "the sky is blue" and this forum would argue it to death . . .Uzique wrote:
and i thought literature was ambiguous
This.BRiiNDED wrote:
Jebus wrote:
Always 2, everyone who says 288 is stupid, srs.
Would have to be 48/2*(9+3) for it to be 288.
48/2(9+3) = 2
says the film majormtb0minime wrote:
Is 2*3÷6*5 = 5 or 1/5 ???
This thread makes me go at the people who think they know math, its symbols, and order of operations.
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
says the film majormtb0minime wrote:
Is 2*3÷6*5 = 5 or 1/5 ???
This thread makes me go at the people who think they know math, its symbols, and order of operations.
Last edited by mtb0minime (2011-04-09 13:47:42)