Why do we allow these rent-a-cops to molest airline passengers?

2011-06-05 17:41:36

#101

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

lowing wrote:
Jaekus wrote:
Can you not derail every thread in this forum with hair splitting? Pretty sure everyone here is over it.

I don't see it as suspect. She was clearly upset by it. People aren't generic creatures with the same impulses. Some people would just be creeped out, some would be traumatised and some would want to be proactive to take control of a situation that adversely affected them that was out of their control and in their opinion, out of line.

Did you even watch the video? Or are you happy with a guy touching your cock a few times when you go through the security check?
Now this I love, Ken Jennings goes off on the multiple definitions of molest, even though we were clearly discussing sexual assault, and you applaud him and claiming I was "schooled". Then I make sure we are talking about the same definition and you accuse of me derailing... no bias there that I can see. lol.

Been through plenty of screenings and no one ever grabbed my "cock a few times" while they did it. Sorry. Fact is, I don't need the money or attention this law suit is gunna try and bring.

You were the one arguing something you don't understand, got told, and continue to split hairs. I'm sure you love that.

Maybe you should have your cock grabbed by the security guys a few times to give you some perspective, since you don't understand.

Really though guys, how many terrorist plots have been foiled using this method of "screening" since 9/11?

2011-06-05 17:49:45

#102

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7038|USA

Jaekus wrote:
lowing wrote:
Jaekus wrote:
Can you not derail every thread in this forum with hair splitting? Pretty sure everyone here is over it.

I don't see it as suspect. She was clearly upset by it. People aren't generic creatures with the same impulses. Some people would just be creeped out, some would be traumatised and some would want to be proactive to take control of a situation that adversely affected them that was out of their control and in their opinion, out of line.

Did you even watch the video? Or are you happy with a guy touching your cock a few times when you go through the security check?
Now this I love, Ken Jennings goes off on the multiple definitions of molest, even though we were clearly discussing sexual assault, and you applaud him and claiming I was "schooled". Then I make sure we are talking about the same definition and you accuse of me derailing... no bias there that I can see. lol.

Been through plenty of screenings and no one ever grabbed my "cock a few times" while they did it. Sorry. Fact is, I don't need the money or attention this law suit is gunna try and bring.
You were the one arguing something you don't understand, got told, and continue to split hairs. I'm sure you love that.

Maybe you should have your cock grabbed by the security guys a few times to give you some perspective, since you don't understand.

Really though guys, how many terrorist plots have been foiled using this method of "screening" since 9/11?

No, this is what started it.. http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 4#p3550524 ...and it was not started by me...Others have pointed that out as well.

yeah because the second a security guard grabs my junk I am gunna run to youtube with it and that'll show'em!!!

Last edited by lowing (2011-06-05 17:58:34)

2011-06-05 18:04:29

#103

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

Right, so you're happy with security touching your cock a few times.... got it.

2011-06-05 18:06:31

#104

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7038|USA

Jaekus wrote:
Right, so you're happy with security touching your cock a few times.... got it.

yeah whatever you say Jaekus. Do me a favor, put me on ignore will ya?

2011-06-05 18:16:08

#105

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

But isn't disagreeing with everyone (ie. trolling) your "entertainment" on here? You've said so many times.

2011-06-05 18:18:34

#106

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7038|USA

Jaekus wrote:
But isn't disagreeing with everyone (ie. trolling) your "entertainment" on here? You've said so many times.

disagreeing isn't trolling, my opinions are genuine. You're just an asshole, and you are excelling at it. so go be an asshole somewhere else.

2011-06-05 18:19:20

#107

eleven bravo: Member; +1,399|5646|foggy bottom

whats up with the insults?

Tu Stultus Es

2011-06-05 18:31:29

#108

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

I dunno, must be another troll attempt.

Anyyyyyywayyyyy, I did ask a couple questions in this thread and I don't think they're all that hard to answer by folks in the US:

1) How many terrorist plots have been foiled using this method of "screening" since 9/11?

2) Does this happen in all airports, or just Texas?

2011-06-05 23:01:25

#109

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7103

Jaekus wrote:
I dunno, must be another troll attempt.

Anyyyyyywayyyyy, I did ask a couple questions in this thread and I don't think they're all that hard to answer by folks in the US:

1) How many terrorist plots have been foiled using this method of "screening" since 9/11?

2) Does this happen in all airports, or just Texas?

1) 0 because terrorists are scared of amerika
2) dont mess with texas

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2011-06-06 03:00:34

#110

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

Question 2 has a bit of self interest because I'm flying into LA in August and a mate said the security guy touched his crotch when he was going through customs

Kinda weird.

2011-06-06 04:26:36

#111

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7036

Jaekus wrote:
Right, so you're happy with security touching your cock a few times.... got it.

I've had my cock touched by security. It's a little awkward, but no big deal really. And as to your questions, I doubt it'll happen. I've flown through American airports 10 or more times since they've brought all this shit in, and the only time I've had one of these particularly rough friskings was at Heathrow. Everywhere else we've just walked through a metal detector. I've never even seen one of these backscatter things in use. The only people I've seen run into trouble are the ones that get arsey about taking their shoes off or something. Which frankly, I think makes you a fucking idiot.

TL;DR: Don't be a cunt and you'll be fine, but it's no big deal if it does happen to you.

2011-06-06 04:29:14

#112

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

Ok. I've had the random bomb check thing a few times and have taken off my shoes once or twice. I've heard I'll get my fingerprints electronically recorded along with facial recognition when I go through customs, but again I'm ok with that. Just the genitals are for my hands and/or female hands only!

2011-06-06 05:33:03

#113

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,820|6493|eXtreme to the maX

Jaekus wrote:
Ok. I've had the random bomb check thing a few times and have taken off my shoes once or twice. I've heard I'll get my fingerprints electronically recorded along with facial recognition when I go through customs, but again I'm ok with that. Just the genitals are for my hands and/or female hands only!

I think you can request a hot female TSA officer.

Just tell the male TSA officers you're not gay and the fugly female ones you don't do fugly chicks.

Fuck Israel

2011-06-06 07:50:58

#114

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6925|Long Island, New York

Meh. I don't really mind the pat down. And I've gotten the "random" security check plenty of times when my stepmom still had her original last name (she's a muslim from Albania). Not a big deal and barely an inconvenience.

2011-06-06 08:35:07

#115

Stimey: +786|6507|Ontario | Canada

ya its horseshit but its for the best really. i guess having your junk patted twice would be the preferable alternative to getting blown the fuck up.
if you don't like it buy your own plane.

2011-06-06 09:24:06

#116

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6884

Stimey wrote:
ya its horseshit but its for the best really. i guess having your junk patted twice would be the preferable alternative to getting blown the fuck up.
if you don't like it buy your own plane.

then, i'd have to hire someonr to pat me?

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/avatard/lowing.png

2011-06-06 12:25:28

#117

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

Professional Patter

2011-06-06 16:32:07

#118

fo0k: Member; +14|7134|London, England

If I could afford it, I'd employ a professional female molester.

www.bfmods.com

2011-06-06 16:46:16

#119

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

fo0k wrote:
If I could afford it, I'd hire a hooker.

2011-06-06 16:55:04

#120

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,990|7019|949

Stimey wrote:
ya its horseshit but its for the best really. i guess having your junk patted twice would be the preferable alternative to getting blown the fuck up.
if you don't like it buy your own plane.

but it's not really for the best. There's better options that are far less physically intrusive. Not everyone is patted down. Not everyone goes through the backscatter machines. So if by chance the $12/hour guard catches one of these terrorists, great. But the fact of the matter is pat downs don't do much if anything at all for security except make people complain. I've seen/read results from numerous tests the airlines and government have performed regarding airport security, and they all have dismal results.

2011-06-06 17:14:05

#121

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

If someone's really carrying something a pat down won't do much. Get a sniffer dog or some scanning device. Pat downs are just for show and are intrusive.

2011-06-06 17:21:38

#122

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7038|USA

Jaekus wrote:
If someone's really carrying something a pat down won't do much. Get a sniffer dog or some scanning device. Pat downs are just for show and are intrusive.

Anyone that bitches about a pat down before getting on s plane is probably the same guy that bitches "In GOd we trust" is on the money, or "One Nation Under God" is in the Pledge of Allegiance. Just something to bitch about and sue over.

Last edited by lowing (2011-06-06 17:25:08)

2011-06-06 19:02:15

#123

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,055|7010|Little Bentcock

lowing wrote:
Jaekus wrote:
If someone's really carrying something a pat down won't do much. Get a sniffer dog or some scanning device. Pat downs are just for show and are intrusive.
Anyone that bitches about a pat down before getting on s plane is probably the same guy that bitches "In GOd we trust" is on the money, or "One Nation Under God" is in the Pledge of Allegiance. Just something to bitch about and sue over.

You can't say god on the radio here now.

2011-06-06 19:04:47

#124

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5565|Sydney

Adams_BJ wrote:
lowing wrote:
Jaekus wrote:
If someone's really carrying something a pat down won't do much. Get a sniffer dog or some scanning device. Pat downs are just for show and are intrusive.
Anyone that bitches about a pat down before getting on s plane is probably the same guy that bitches "In GOd we trust" is on the money, or "One Nation Under God" is in the Pledge of Allegiance. Just something to bitch about and sue over.
You can't say god on the radio here now.

2011-06-06 20:39:03

#125

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7103

Jaekus wrote:
If someone's really carrying something a pat down won't do much. Get a sniffer dog or some scanning device. Pat downs are just for show and are intrusive.

thats what the full body scanners are for. miss usa declined to be full body scanned and then got a pat down.

BF2S Forums Why do we allow these rent-a-cops to molest airline passengers?

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Stimey wrote:

fo0k wrote:

Stimey wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:

lowing wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Board footer