Fair enough. Are most active members being watched?
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7135
Stalked more like it.
...
Lies and slander. Take that back.tuckergustav wrote:
each member has their very own personal mod these days. We have all been secretly assigned someone to harassmonitor.
Overruled; need-to-know. Will leak title:Macbeth wrote:
The U.S. constitution says a man has a right to confront his accusers and see the evidence against him. A deleted thread can not be presented as evidence against me due to this obvious violation of the 6th amendment of the United States of America. The United States is of course the legal residence of the bf2s server, the site founder, and majority of site administrators.
Most evil idea I have ever had; using the flu to kill people with Aids
Rather than PMing that and allowing me to answer in a fair manner, you instead leaked the title to the rest of the forum and have inflamed forum opinion. That "evidence" can not be used now and throws your motives into question considering you have not offered any other evidence against me nor have you made a definite statement of support or opposition.
The evidence in question is null and void. If there is no other "evidence" against my nomination, I would like to have a straight vote or to receive my the confirmation of my appointment in the form of my full mod powers.
The evidence in question is null and void. If there is no other "evidence" against my nomination, I would like to have a straight vote or to receive my the confirmation of my appointment in the form of my full mod powers.
The entire thread holds the arbitrary mod selection process in contempt. We only accept those most likely to corrupt.
The notion of evidence presumes this is a fair and balanced judicial process.
Ah, the Fox defense.
I would like to take this opportunity to point out the unethical nature or actions of the moderator known as 'unnamednewbie13'. Said moderator has either:
A. Admitted his own true nature as a corrupt, unethical man, who views the mod selection process as well as the moderator position as a corrupt institution to be used for his own satisfaction.
B. Is attempting to make the nominee, me, admit to being corruptible in a effort to disqualify me from the post of moderator. That is a clear violation of the fifth amendment of the United States.
I will ask that the other moderators please ignore his testimony.
A. Admitted his own true nature as a corrupt, unethical man, who views the mod selection process as well as the moderator position as a corrupt institution to be used for his own satisfaction.
B. Is attempting to make the nominee, me, admit to being corruptible in a effort to disqualify me from the post of moderator. That is a clear violation of the fifth amendment of the United States.
I will ask that the other moderators please ignore his testimony.
You've only got half the story. I use cheat codes in video games.
gasp
...
Macbeth for not mod.
Bigmak4lyf
Why is he still mod. I cover all the criteria. Why arent i also mod. And kustard and jaekus too. But not reaps though.
Adams_BJ wrote:
Why is he still mod. I cover all the criteria. Why arent i also mod. And kustard and jaekus too. But not reaps though.
I believe Aussie Reaper should be a mod.
This thread has me in the lulz. Ps my phone is retyping shit so im not just repeating myself.
Apart from not raeps
Apart from not raeps
Are you monitoring me, babe?tuckergustav wrote:
each member has their very own personal mod these days. We have all been secretly assigned someone to harassmonitor.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Seriously?
1. I post well.
2. I haven't been in trouble at all in well over a year and a half.
3. I'm nice to everyone and everyone likes me. From lowing to 13/f/taiwan.
4. I'm insightful, and sincere.
5. I don't hold grudges. I'm a ball of happiness.
So why am I not a mod yet when I obviously have all the attributes for being a successful moderator?
1. I post well.
2. I haven't been in trouble at all in well over a year and a half.
3. I'm nice to everyone and everyone likes me. From lowing to 13/f/taiwan.
4. I'm insightful, and sincere.
5. I don't hold grudges. I'm a ball of happiness.
So why am I not a mod yet when I obviously have all the attributes for being a successful moderator?
^ Too sexy
'Cause we have idiots in power that won't let ya.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
@fin
probably and that would be a valid excuse that I would accept
probably and that would be a valid excuse that I would accept
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2011-06-13 09:13:18)
Did you really just call me babe? really?War Man wrote:
Are you monitoring me, babe?tuckergustav wrote:
each member has their very own personal mod these days. We have all been secretly assigned someone to harassmonitor.
...
he sleeps with one mod and now he can be ultra casual with the rest of themtuckergustav wrote:
Did you really just call me babe? really?War Man wrote:
Are you monitoring me, babe?tuckergustav wrote:
each member has their very own personal mod these days. We have all been secretly assigned someone to harassmonitor.
supreme ruler of the internets checking in
hey, and liquidat0r's here too!liquidat0r wrote:
supreme ruler of the internets checking in