My friend drives an M5. That thing is NOT suited for city driving. The car shakes and jerks if you move too slowly.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6946
it is a hairdressers car
like the Z4, Audi TT, Posrche Boxter, etc. it's a car your wife drives, not you
like the Z4, Audi TT, Posrche Boxter, etc. it's a car your wife drives, not you
probably a decent one lolFinray wrote:
The fuck hairdresser are you going to, I thought paying £12 for mine was a bit steep.
♥
one that doesn't make me look like a faggot from a 30 seconds to mars cover-band
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
i shaved my head a couple months ago and now i have a mullet. think i need a trip to the barber
hax
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
TT RS isn't the same, its noiceToilet Sex wrote:
it's like the TT-RS, it's still very hairdresseryToilet Sex wrote:
M1 lol
the 1M is pretty gay
Have you not looked in the mirror?Uzique wrote:
one that doesn't make me look like a faggot
have you?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
I don't get the 1M hate, ITT. Sure, it's the entry level M and it can't compete with the higher M's but it's sure as hell better than a Camry or Civic.
Stimey wrote:
they dont actually mean hairdressers
basically all people who want to buy a sporty looking car but has no actual muscle behind it
just something flashy to impress their friends with
There was something about the way they drove that that made the car look like it's actually a really boring car and terrible at that type of driving.
Exactly what I was saying.ghettoperson wrote:
There was something about the way they drove that that made the car look like it's actually a really boring car and terrible at that type of driving.
Well you would be wrong.ghettoperson wrote:
There was something about the way they drove that that made the car look like it's actually a really boring car and terrible at that type of driving.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Judging by the video, Camm - if the stability control and everything is jumping in so much to where you can't even get a decent inertia drift going on then yea, it likely isn't the best track car.
Judging by the video is not the best way to judge the car.CapnNismo wrote:
Judging by the video, Camm - if the stability control and everything is jumping in so much to where you can't even get a decent inertia drift going on then yea, it likely isn't the best track car.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Uzique gets his hair cut?Uzique wrote:
eh? hairdressers can't afford it? if my hairdresser can charge £40-60 for a haircut... that takes him 20 minutes...Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
hairdressers generally cannot afford a bmw unless they top shelf
then i want to know WHO can afford it
You're right of course. I'll wait for the inevitable Top Gear test.Camm wrote:
Judging by the video is not the best way to judge the car.CapnNismo wrote:
Judging by the video, Camm - if the stability control and everything is jumping in so much to where you can't even get a decent inertia drift going on then yea, it likely isn't the best track car.
Last edited by CapnNismo (2011-06-16 12:38:42)
Someone get toiletsex in here, and grab some popcornCapnNismo wrote:
Look at the weight of the car - it's a fatty. It's over 1.5 tons and it's essentially the size of a 4th gen VW Golf. Sorry, but you can't have a small car that is that fat and consider it a good track car. Newer BMWs and Audis, while being very advanced technologically, are still shit.Camm wrote:
Judging by the video is not the best way to judge the car.CapnNismo wrote:
Judging by the video, Camm - if the stability control and everything is jumping in so much to where you can't even get a decent inertia drift going on then yea, it likely isn't the best track car.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
I changed my post and I'm agreeing with you. I did some thinking and took a look at other figures for similar cars. Foot removed from mouth.
But what I'll say is this: BMWs and Audis have no soul. They're overly luxurious, overly technological machines. They're also extremely heavy... I've never enjoyed driving large and heavy vehicles, though, so maybe there's too much personal opinion coming in here.
But what I'll say is this: BMWs and Audis have no soul. They're overly luxurious, overly technological machines. They're also extremely heavy... I've never enjoyed driving large and heavy vehicles, though, so maybe there's too much personal opinion coming in here.
Last edited by CapnNismo (2011-06-16 12:40:58)
heh, I read the review in last months Top Gear mag, they say it's brilliant fun to driveCapnNismo wrote:
I changed my post and I'm agreeing with you. I did some thinking and took a look at other figures for similar cars. Foot removed from mouth.
But what I'll say is this: BMWs and Audis have no soul. They're overly luxurious, overly technological machines. They're also extremely heavy... I've never enjoyed driving large and heavy vehicles, though, so maybe there's too much personal opinion coming in here.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
I'm sure it is a blast to drive. Hell, anything with more than 300hp and that kind of 0-60 is likely a great drive. But it's still a fatty and it's still a new-gen BMW. BMW is better than Audi, though. I loathe Audis and VWs with a passion... I can't stand automotive discussions with Austrians and Germans - they're all hung up on Audis and VWs. I want to kick them all in the teeth.
Last edited by CapnNismo (2011-06-16 12:44:47)
BTW Camm - I love how the two of us are playing tag between this thread and the "What tech did you buy" thread. XD