Sturgeon
Member
+488|5196|Flintshire
wtf why did that post again, I submitted the post at like midnight last night
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6701|Amsterdam‫
that
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5613|London, England

mikkel wrote:

Why do people think that it's a bad idea? It's much easier to prevent phishing when the TLD can be a source of trust.
I think the only people that would voice a complaint are those that were hoping to do a second round of domain squatting.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5957|College Park, MD
i'm pretty sure gmail now offers a function to verify that the sender is who they say they are, seems kinda moot
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6777|...

Jay wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Why do people think that it's a bad idea? It's much easier to prevent phishing when the TLD can be a source of trust.
I think the only people that would voice a complaint are those that were hoping to do a second round of domain squatting.
this
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6856|132 and Bush

Someone squatted on one of our business domains when we let it expire.. They wanted $250 to release it. Douchers.
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard