Dilbert_X wrote:
RAIMIUS wrote:
Dilbert_X wrote:
If it means crazies can get hold of high capacity magazines then it makes a difference to me.
Really, most people don't really need a self-defence weapon except in circumstances they could probably avoid. Even then they don't need a full-size pistol with a 15 round mag - unless they know 15 people who don't like them.
Which arbitrary limit would you like?
You do realize that pistol ammunition has a relatively low rate of instant/near-instant incapacitation, don't you? It can take several rounds to stop an attacker. Now, factor in the possibility of missing while under immense stress and the possibility of multiple attackers. How many rounds to you think it would take?
Every missed shot is a stray bullet which could kill a bystander, if you need more than five or six shots you need to learn to shoot, not get into that kind of situation in the first place, and if 2-3 guys are gunning for you you've probably had it before you've even drawn.
Does everyone who carries concealed have or need a full size pistol with a 15 round magazine? I doubt it.
Large cap magazines just encourage people to spray bullets around in the hope of hitting something.
No, not everyone carries double-stack pistols. Single-stack pistols are easier to carry (width and weight).
I'm thinking of getting something like a Kahr PM9 (6+1 in 9mm). I'd probably carry an extra mag due to the fact that most malfunctions in semi-auto pistols are mag related. In the risk management department, I'm comfortable with being able to stop 1-2 attackers. That covers most scenarios involving lethal force, which occur rarely anyway.
I don't really believe the "I'm in a safe place" argument, having lost a friend to an active shooter at a university. Sure, some places are safer than others, but bad things can happen anywhere. CCW just offers another layer of insurance.