Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857
i can't remember where i was getting half of them from, and besides it was spontaneous + was made good by the people that were online/on teamspeak at the same time.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
gurdeep
­
+812|5142|proll­y
What are one potato say other potato?
Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato?
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|7126|Toronto | Canada

Uzique wrote:

scandinavians > all when it comes to euro chicks. maybe tied with the central european 'exotic' chicks if that's your taste (e.g. serbians), alternatively. but when it comes to white western chicks, especially blonde ones, the scandinavians have that shit on lock.
all the serbians ive met at school are jaw-dropping.  met one and became pretty good friends with her, then went out to a club with her and her friends once, it was quite the night.

and to his tv comparison - how is that different from the thing people do to their 555 headphones to make them into 595s?
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857
ya that makes sense except nobody pays for the media equivalent of the 555's when they rip music or software. they pay for nothing. he was using his analogy as a way of justifying ripping off free trial software to full cracked versions. you don't get the 555's for nothing on a trial. you pay for them.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6887|so randum

Uzique wrote:

it was my thread
don't play down our dear departed bagg's involvement O:
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6887|so randum
he's not dead burnzz, he just doesn't post anymore
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6884

ah, ok. i guess prison life gets pretty involved . . .
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,820|6493|eXtreme to the maX

Macbeth wrote:

Uzique wrote:

you're a stupid little kid haibai and i really hope that as soon as you leave your yokel polack community and get a taste of the wider world that your perspectives are corrected in the most brutal and disillusioning way possible.
Polish girls are hot. Favorite breed of Euro. The blonde hair, lite eyes, cute accent gah I'll take two plox
Bullshit, Czech girls are hot, Hungarian girls are hot, Ukrainian girls are hot, Poles a long way back.
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5745|London, England
Poles are hot when young but age poorly.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6884

kinda like a potato in an oven, amirite?
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857

Dilbert_X wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Uzique wrote:

you're a stupid little kid haibai and i really hope that as soon as you leave your yokel polack community and get a taste of the wider world that your perspectives are corrected in the most brutal and disillusioning way possible.
Polish girls are hot. Favorite breed of Euro. The blonde hair, lite eyes, cute accent gah I'll take two plox
Bullshit, Czech girls are hot, Hungarian girls are hot, Ukrainian girls are hot, Poles a long way back.
yeah but the danes are the all-time tops, amirite?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5973

Uzique wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Macbeth wrote:


Polish girls are hot. Favorite breed of Euro. The blonde hair, lite eyes, cute accent gah I'll take two plox
Bullshit, Czech girls are hot, Hungarian girls are hot, Ukrainian girls are hot, Poles a long way back.
yeah but the danes are the all-time tops, amirite?
Whenever I hear Dane I think of Floppy.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,820|6493|eXtreme to the maX

Jenspm wrote:

It may be because I'm Norwegian myself, but Scandinavians are bland imo. All tall, blond and blue-eyed, they all look the same really, none of them are interesting.
Yes it must be, Scandinavians > All

Not sure if I count the Nordics as being really European, they're a race apart.
Fuck Israel
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857

Macbeth wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


Bullshit, Czech girls are hot, Hungarian girls are hot, Ukrainian girls are hot, Poles a long way back.
yeah but the danes are the all-time tops, amirite?
Whenever I hear Dane I think of Floppy.
you're missing out
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
baggs
Member
+732|6591
Latvian jokes were first introduced to bf2s by me, yet another bandwagon Uzique jumped on.

I'm not dead.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6887|so randum
rip baggs
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857

baggs wrote:

Latvian jokes were first introduced to bf2s by me, yet another bandwagon Uzique jumped on.

I'm not dead.
you're a liar! we were pm'ing one another about it and everything at the time. i'd throw you in jail you fuckin crony crook
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
baggs
Member
+732|6591

Uzique wrote:

baggs wrote:

Latvian jokes were first introduced to bf2s by me, yet another bandwagon Uzique jumped on.

I'm not dead.
you're a liar! we were pm'ing one another about it and everything at the time. i'd throw you in jail you fuckin crony crook
ok ok, if youre getting all sandy vagina'd about it, it was a joint venture.

throwing me in jail wouldnt make much difference seeing as ive spent what feels like this last week of my life in there, thank fuck 2moro is the last shift before i go skiing in the Alps.
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|7046|BC, Canada
rip mek, rip baggs, rip lowing.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857

baggs wrote:

Uzique wrote:

baggs wrote:

Latvian jokes were first introduced to bf2s by me, yet another bandwagon Uzique jumped on.

I'm not dead.
you're a liar! we were pm'ing one another about it and everything at the time. i'd throw you in jail you fuckin crony crook
ok ok, if youre getting all sandy vagina'd about it, it was a joint venture.

throwing me in jail wouldnt make much difference seeing as ive spent what feels like this last week of my life in there, thank fuck 2moro is the last shift before i go skiing in the Alps.
say hello to rose west for me
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
BVC
Member
+325|7082
It shouldn't be referred to as "piracy".  Piracy involves people on boats with guns robbing cruise liners, freighters etc.  It also shouldn't be referred to as "theft".  Theft involves non-consensual removal of a physical object.  Even referring to it as "deprivation of revenue" is dubious, as there is no guarantee that someone who copies a movie or song would have purchased whatever it is which was copied.

What this is, is copyright infringement.  It is immoral, yes, but to call it any of the terms listed above is to demonise it.  Morally, I would say that for the end user its about as bad as dropping an empty soft drink can, not putting a dollar into the parking meter, or going 3 or 4kms over the speed limit.

Punishments typically meted out by governments around the world to the end user are highly disproportional to the crime.  Would $20,000 and a three-month driving ban seem fair for a third parking ticket?  No.  So why should end-users be subject to this sort of bullshit?  Why do movie & recording companies get such "special protection" for their industry?

Note: I'm only talking about little Johnny here downloading the latest Rihanna song or whatever, not massive DVD-copying sweatshops.  Thats a completely different ballgame.

Last edited by Pubic (2011-12-28 01:19:26)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,820|6493|eXtreme to the maX
Punishments typically meted out by governments around the world to the end user are highly disproportional to the crime.  Would $20,000 and a three-month driving ban seem fair for a third parking ticket?  No.  So why should end-users be subject to this sort of bullshit?
Dunno, because someone parking somewhere for a short time doesn't typically defraud a company out of thousands of dollars and the state out of hundreds of dollars in tax revenue?

Little Johnny doesn't typically get hit by the Feds, unless he's downloaded thousands of songs or a lot of software - in which case its usually proportionate.

Why do movie & recording companies get such "special protection" for their industry?
Because thats the only way to protect them?

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-12-28 02:24:42)

Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5745|London, England

Pubic wrote:

It shouldn't be referred to as "piracy".  Piracy involves people on boats with guns robbing cruise liners, freighters etc.  It also shouldn't be referred to as "theft".  Theft involves non-consensual removal of a physical object.  Even referring to it as "deprivation of revenue" is dubious, as there is no guarantee that someone who copies a movie or song would have purchased whatever it is which was copied.

What this is, is copyright infringement.  It is immoral, yes, but to call it any of the terms listed above is to demonise it.  Morally, I would say that for the end user its about as bad as dropping an empty soft drink can, not putting a dollar into the parking meter, or going 3 or 4kms over the speed limit.

Punishments typically meted out by governments around the world to the end user are highly disproportional to the crime.  Would $20,000 and a three-month driving ban seem fair for a third parking ticket?  No.  So why should end-users be subject to this sort of bullshit?  Why do movie & recording companies get such "special protection" for their industry?

Note: I'm only talking about little Johnny here downloading the latest Rihanna song or whatever, not massive DVD-copying sweatshops.  Thats a completely different ballgame.
nice copypasta
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6857

Dilbert_X wrote:

Little Johnny doesn't typically get hit by the Feds, unless he's downloaded thousands of songs or a lot of software - in which case its usually proportionate.
?
little johnny represents at least 75% of cases that bodies like the RIAA bring to court. it is precisely young clueless teens downloading a small amount of songs that they throw scary, sensationalist $250,000 dollar lawsuits at. that has been their main strategy for the last decade - the one that hasn't worked at all. they went with the 'use our expensive lawyers to bring huge lawsuits against people to deter others by fear' and it didn't work (obviously). but saying "little johnny doesn't typically get hit by the feds..." is completely wrong. there are plenty of cases blown-up in the media (probably courtesy of the riaa's pr people) saying "this child is being sued to the extent of $26,000 per song - piracy, don't do it!"
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6887|so randum
rip baggs
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard