No, it was not OK, it was shit in every departement. Gunhandling was decent maybe, but very unimpressive. AI, mission & campaign design, graphics, controls were subpar at the very best. Don´t even get me started on MP.

That looks fun? What are you 5?globefish23 wrote:
Penguin's Arena: Sedna's World
An arcade shooter with penguins and snowballs. Looked fun at first, but apparently, the initial release was beyond alpha quality with barely a handful of players online.
Agree.Sisco wrote:
No, it was not OK, it was shit in every departement. Gunhandling was decent maybe, but very unimpressive. AI, mission & campaign design, graphics, controls were subpar at the very best. Don´t even get me started on MP.
Plus, you couldnt turn your head while in a vehicle. Felt like i was in a goddamn neckbrace.AussieReaper wrote:
Agree.Sisco wrote:
No, it was not OK, it was shit in every departement. Gunhandling was decent maybe, but very unimpressive. AI, mission & campaign design, graphics, controls were subpar at the very best. Don´t even get me started on MP.
Adding AI to multiplayer was the dumbest move possible.
I too have a very high tolerance towards shit games. Usually, if I get a few good hours outta it (like with TDU2) I don´t mind that much, but DR was like getting spit in the face. I played OFP religiously despite its flaws and even though I bought DR at a reduced release day price of 25£, it´s the single purchase I regret the most ever.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Granted. I suppose my disdain for DR has been tempered by 25+ years of playing the worst video games ever made.
That would be correctfirebolt5 wrote:
lol, I thought that too, but I think it was assumed he didn't bother buying the second one.Vilham wrote:
Wait so let me get this right. You liked clear sky, the worst stalker game. It was literally dog shit._j5689_ wrote:
Definitely the first and third S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games, the first one was unplayably unstable and the third one felt like just an uninteresting, unstable, empty shell of a game that was way too hard to get into
Supreme Commander 2 was shit also, I liked the new upgrades system and the amazing graphics but it felt too much like all the factions lost their individuality aside from the experimentals, even the first game never felt that tactical to me to begin with but this one definitely felt like it was more of a numbers vs numbers game than anything tactical. I think I got it for like $10 on sale on Steam though.
C&C: Red Alert 3 sucked too, it feels nothing like Red Alert 2 did which tbh is what I was probably looking for with better graphics in this game(can you blame me though, it's probably one of the best RTS games of all time), I do feel like giving it another try though right now but I think there was something new about its mechanics that I saw that I don't remember now that just made me drop the game immediately. I already know that I definitely hate those catapult things that I remember from one of the gameplay trailers, it seems like that's the new "ME TOO" feature in RTS games these days. I don't like the ability for everybody to built everything on water either, it becomes impossible to take the game any bit seriously and just defeats the point of there being water other than that you can build ships on it.
Every now and then I wonder about that game, but you're kinda convincing me not to ever bother. What was so bad about it?Ultrafunkula wrote:
Bully. Teaches me to go clicky-clicky in steam after a night at the bar. 5€ badly spent. Or whatever peanuts it cost me