You can't read, can you?

Macbeth wrote:
AnywayYeah theseMacbeth wrote:
Rome, Medieval Total war
Rainbow 6
Empire/ Napoleon total war
kampf what the hellKampframmer wrote:
Absolutely nothing. A FPS is best suited for teams of at least 3 or 4 (which might be a fun idea as well).KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I was asking what makes an FPS game good for 1v1, not why battlefield 3 is bad.
For 1v1 you can best use an RTS, problem is, were not all experienced RTS players and i thought this was supposed to be a very open tournament. The learning curve is simply to high on those games.
Honestly, if you want to host a tournament on BF2s, let people make teams of 4 and pick a FPS like BF2 (or 3...), CoD1 (or 4...) or TF2.
1v1's in a FPS are just not entertaining or a real display of skill
Hope they're all trekkies. I've played this randomly at a LAN party where most people were, but only myself and another dude knew how to play it decently. But we didn't know that, so the teams were heavily stacked in Borg favor. After losing a ton of ships to assimilation then seeing multiple killing-blow fusion cubes, the Feds threw in the towel and we launched Serious Sam instead.CC-Marley wrote:
armada2
Last edited by NooBesT (2012-02-15 01:08:07)
I like how you skipped the "drunk as fuck" for Scot, cause it's kinda our default state.NooBesT wrote:
Nothing, it's a Scot and a drunk as fuck Finn, what did you honestly expect?
Last edited by Adams_BJ (2012-02-15 03:44:59)
thatd be pretty shit broAdams_BJ wrote:
should do some sik eve pvping.
nvm me im drunk
e: should probably include the game, LOL!