BF2S Forums Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

\o/

Spearhead wrote:

UnkleRukus wrote:

I'm willing to bet my left nut, that DICE makes zero decisions on any of their titles.

Yep.  I can just picture in my head all of their drawings of giant Zatar Wetlands style maps and then some EA schmuck comes through the door and says "nope, we're doing tunnels"

zatar was shit though.

Have fun Teds

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

-Whiteroom- wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

Yep.  I can just picture in my head all of their drawings of giant Zatar Wetlands style maps and then some EA schmuck comes through the door and says "nope, we're doing tunnels"

zatar was shit though.

It was one of the least played maps. I think only Clean Sweep got less time.

Larger maps usually require more time to make and ended up getting played much less. DICE is trying to sell games and not jack-off a small group of people who enjoy waiting for vehicles to respawn only to get killed by a TV missile before they come anywhere close to doing anything that normal people would consider fun.

which was entirely weird because OCS was an awesome map. really good dynamics

zatar was utter shit though, and was held up as a 'well bf2 did big maps aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' example

m3thod wrote:

its has been removed

did it look good?

mtb0minime wrote:

DSL, you are irrationally defensive of this game. All that hooah'ing has gotten to you! Snap out of it, man!

Hooah!

Fuck off you bunch of bellends zatar was a great map,

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Fuck guys. Before BF3 came out I went back to BF2 for a week and got more pissed off at it than I thought I could at a game. Then I look back and remember that BF2 got me more pissed off than I'd ever been at anything. I've never been anywhere close to that pissed off at BF3, so I'm going to conclude that BF3 is better based on that.

I think you were the one earlier who made the comment that they shifted the focus of the game to be more favorable to a wider audience, basically meaning they were going to try to put a damper on players who are so good they will dominate. And that's very true...just see the suppression effect.

I guess I'm the complete opposite as you, because BF3 makes me rage like no FPS in memory. I can hardly finish a round at this point, so this patch needs to right some wrongs, and Armored Kill needs to deliver.

Last edited by -CARNIFEX-[LOC] (2012-06-03 21:20:29)

mtb0minime wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Fuck guys. Before BF3 came out I went back to BF2 for a week and got more pissed off at it than I thought I could at a game. Then I look back and remember that BF2 got me more pissed off than I'd ever been at anything. I've never been anywhere close to that pissed off at BF3, so I'm going to conclude that BF3 is better based on that.

This is why I think BF3 is a worse game. I've never been angrier at a game than BF3. Maybe God of War 3, but I didn't play it as long, so the rage wasn't as long-lasting.

bf3 is more noobfriendly than bf2, conclusion: noob in bf2 =rage, noob in bf3= less rage and the other way around for "better/avrage" -players

http://blogs.battlefield.com/2012/05/bf … -announce/

> Fixed an issue where footsteps couldn’t be heard behind you.

thank god

"own"