Nuclear Bombz! Mortarz!

2006-05-21 14:34:24

#1

clbsiss: Member; +-3|7032|Iowa

I think BF2 should have nuclear bombs. Even though it would kill almost every one.

The Mecs arty should be mortatrs. Or have Anti- Tank guys should carry them. (AT WAKE ISLAND TO HIT the Chinese Airbase when arty is blown up or reloading.

2006-05-21 15:41:12

#2

tgust5: Member; +22|7108

Nukes!!!!!!!!!????????????? are you serious????
A nuke could destroy and vaporize like 3 wake islands. you know how many tks there will be!
Mortars are world war 2-ish. Arty. is the same thing, just bigger.

Im not gonna give you negative karma because im out of karma points today---BUT--if i could, i would

2006-05-21 16:27:10

#3

Darky: Hi..; +71|7043|Here.

tgust5 wrote:
Mortars are world war 2-ish.

Check this link. That's 3 mortar variants, currently in use.

2006-05-21 16:30:46

#4

King_County_Downy: shitfaced; +2,791|7078|Seattle

teh ghey

Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it

2006-05-21 16:32:12

#5

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|7125

tgust5 wrote:
Nukes!!!!!!!!!????????????? are you serious????
A nuke could destroy and vaporize like 3 wake islands. you know how many tks there will be!
Mortars are world war 2-ish. Arty. is the same thing, just bigger.

Im not gonna give you negative karma because im out of karma points today---BUT--if i could, i would

ww2ish....holy christ almighty take that back.

mortars are more extensively used in modern combat today than the big guns

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-05-21 16:33:40)

2006-05-21 16:37:58

#6

ssj3barua: Member; +55|7170|Indianapolis, IN, U.S.

clbsiss your an Idiot.

2006-05-22 06:49:25

#7

MurPHy: Member; +9|7053|West Deptford, NJ

This is HILARIOUS. Tactical nuclear weaponry. And how do you propose it be employed, and by who? Certainly the Commander doesn't have the rank or authority to do such a thing (at best he's leading 32 men, that's a good sized platoon, making him a 2nd Lieutenant).

This guy's thinking from the General's chair, while the rest of us are fighting in the ditches, in the mud and the blood.

2006-05-22 06:52:15

#8

Static-nl: Member; +14|7038

Having mortars would kill the game even more tbh.

As within days people will have figured out a way to pixel shoot them at spawn points.

2006-05-22 08:35:54

#9

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,081|7253|PNW

Mortars can only be brought in if EA were to reimplement the classic artillery "firing mode."

As for nukes? Hell no. All these maps are battles for critical strategic locations and resources. One side would hardly nuke it.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-05-22 08:37:05)

2006-05-23 03:20:18

#10

MorbidFetus: Member; +76|7032|Ohio

Ea Wherez My Azin Horez>?!???

2006-05-23 04:32:11

#11

Darky: Hi..; +71|7043|Here.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Mortars can only be brought in if EA were to reimplement the classic artillery "firing mode."

As for nukes? Hell no. All these maps are battles for critical strategic locations and resources. One side would hardly nuke it.

Imagine the TK's

2006-05-23 09:45:51

#12

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|7030|UK

I can just imagen tk'n for the nuke lmao.

Honestly though, karkand would be just started, the americans would be just coming down the hill then 'BOOM'

In actual fact, wouldnt there be 2 nukes? One for each commander, lol then that really would be something, both commanders racing to turn theres on first. Great idea, rounds that last for all of 9 seconds, some people reeeeeeeeally should learn to keep there strange ideas in there heads.

2006-05-24 14:40:12

#13

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7324|Reykjavík, Iceland.

There's a hack that allows you to nuke the map z0mg!!~~ w4ll-h4x0rz!

https://img463.imageshack.us/img463/7459/nukes2qz.th.jpg

(No, I'm being sarcastic you fool, it's photoshopped)
Make sure you read the chatter lol

2006-05-24 15:07:37

#14

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7099|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2006-05-24 15:10:57

#15

k1LLr_M: Prone to Own; +118|7074|Houston, TX

Am I the only one that detects sarcasm? You didn't really think he was serious...did you?

2006-05-25 06:33:58

#16

tvmissleman: The Cereal Killer; +201|7139| United States of America

tgust5 wrote:
Mortars are world war 2-ish. Arty. is the same thing, just bigger.

Mortars WWII-ish? i see mortars on the battlefield in Iraq

Last edited by tvmissleman (2006-05-25 06:34:18)

2006-05-28 04:29:11

#17

a fly: Member; +105|7125|The netherlands

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Mortars can only be brought in if EA were to reimplement the classic artillery "firing mode."

As for nukes? Hell no. All these maps are battles for critical strategic locations and resources. One side would hardly nuke it.

you got a point, but they would not put arty on a oil thing eighter

2006-05-28 04:30:55

#18

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7324|Reykjavík, Iceland.

Mortars are ingenious, that's the reason they are still used today.

Basicly it's artillery support that can be carrier around and used by 3 infantry from your squad!

2006-05-28 04:34:36

#19

oberst_enzian: Member; +234|7224|melb.au

tgust5 wrote:
A nuke could destroy and vaporize like 3 wake islands. you know how many tks there will be!

roflmao!!

BF2S Forums Nuclear Bombz! Mortarz!

tgust5 wrote:

tgust5 wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

tgust5 wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

tgust5 wrote:

Board footer