m3thod wrote:
Shocking wrote:
They don't. I just find it funny cause he called my uni 'shit' based on the QS ranking.
i have no idea where you go it's not something you've ever provided...being the secret firum member that you are all i know about you're dutch and you gave up on chem engineering....so maybe on that assumption i thought it would be humorous to poke fun at your phantom uni that is IF you're actually at one.
I have 4 degrees, one of them is 'dodgy' in the utlimate badass uni lists scraping in at 120. really, this is me caring what a bunch of academics or students think haha.
What does matter is when i present my CV to an potential employer....you get the 'thats some good shit' look.
what does it matter? you're using (spurious) academic rankings that are based primarily on research output, citations, academic prestige, and international outlook to boost your petty business career ego. it makes you look pathetic. you're relying on the rankings and esteem of academic research institutions to somehow help your ego when you have nothing to do with academia. you did a degree that serious academia considers 'easy' and not worthy of proper debate/research. you received your degrees because you wanted a high-flying finance/IT career: fair enough. but don't rely on academic rankings that measure research and prestige when none of your university qualifications ever had anything to do with that. you're trying to siphon off a bit of the glory when a) you didn't do any 'hard' academic subjects and b) your link therefore to those institutions' rankings is tenuous at best. "what should you care" what a bunch of academics and students think? evidently a lot, because you're using rankings generated by and aimed solely at academics/students in order to feel better about yourself. tragic.
really a grown adult who is comfortably into his career should not be checking the QS university rankings every year. are you insecure? you come across as a typical business-world mong who is overly concerned with his precious CV. you know that academia looks down upon you, and the institutions see business/management/MBA students as nothing but a reliable money train (most of which are foreign/asian students, simply because they have to pay more, the suckers, as i'm sure you're aware from your world-mix MBA class). so why humiliate yourself by trying to prove your 'superiority' over other uni students who are, by all accounts, doing much harder and more respected subjects than you? none of the academic surveys or research assessments have anything to do with you. if your degrees are there to impress white-collar mongs in offices, that's fine. but don't try and make someone like shocking feel inferior when he's doing something much more difficult and respected than you in the university. if you went to harvard/yale law school or a truly elite business school, maybe then you could gloat. instead you went to mong business departments attached to universities that are highly-ranked for their academic research. it doesn't quite work like that.
also, i hear shocking's complaints about anglocentric world rankings. but tbh the main universities that are losing out in that regard are the german ancients/classics, and the french grand philosophical ecoles, and possibly a few russian technical/scientific institutions. utrecht and amsterdam are already ranked handsomely enough. they're not really of a higher deserving class than their current rank. the criticism is most often levelled w/r/t the rise of chinese and asian academia, who are outputting mind-boggling numbers of scientists and engineers who barely get any ranking recognition. the netherlands is not a much maligned country by the anglocentric 'conspiracy'.
Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-09-13 11:10:19)