There is no need for new airplanes or helos then if we follow your logic.TodErnst wrote:
there's no need for new infantry-weapons, cause we won't get any new army in AF.
i would really, REALLY like a new AT missile. but as you know usmarine, i am a vehicle whore, so i see both sides of this arguement rather well. i propose a hybrid idea, to satisfy both sides. put 2 AT in the little bird, and the driver as support... get near a tank, one fires, turn, the other fires. so its like ENHANCED ground pounding!
well, i tired
well, i tired
Not bad. We did that in Joint Ops Typhoon Rising, but with the javelin. Not sure how well it would work with the dragons the US uses in the game.stryyker wrote:
i would really, REALLY like a new AT missile. but as you know usmarine, i am a vehicle whore, so i see both sides of this arguement rather well. i propose a hybrid idea, to satisfy both sides. put 2 AT in the little bird, and the driver as support... get near a tank, one fires, turn, the other fires. so its like ENHANCED ground pounding!
well, i tired
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-05-27 09:52:51)
2nd option. everyone is Spec Ops, they place all of their charges on the front of the helo, and ram shit. repeat 20-30 timesusmarine2005 wrote:
Not bad. We did that in Joint Ops Typhoon Rising, but with the javelin. Not sure how well it would work with the dragons the US uses in the game.stryyker wrote:
i would really, REALLY like a new AT missile. but as you know usmarine, i am a vehicle whore, so i see both sides of this arguement rather well. i propose a hybrid idea, to satisfy both sides. put 2 AT in the little bird, and the driver as support... get near a tank, one fires, turn, the other fires. so its like ENHANCED ground pounding!
well, i tired
haha, uber jihad jeep. The jihad jeep from hellstryyker wrote:
2nd option. everyone is Spec Ops, they place all of their charges on the front of the helo, and ram shit. repeat 20-30 timesusmarine2005 wrote:
Not bad. We did that in Joint Ops Typhoon Rising, but with the javelin. Not sure how well it would work with the dragons the US uses in the game.stryyker wrote:
i would really, REALLY like a new AT missile. but as you know usmarine, i am a vehicle whore, so i see both sides of this arguement rather well. i propose a hybrid idea, to satisfy both sides. put 2 AT in the little bird, and the driver as support... get near a tank, one fires, turn, the other fires. so its like ENHANCED ground pounding!
well, i tired
How about tactical Nukes for the commander? just a thought
BF2: Nuclear holocaust available on EA downloader in August.gator45666 wrote:
How about tactical Nukes for the commander? just a thought
how about no one in there right minds uses nukes on American soil? o rly? ya rly.gator45666 wrote:
How about tactical Nukes for the commander? just a thought
lolstryyker wrote:
how about no one in there right minds uses nukes on American soil? o rly? ya rly.gator45666 wrote:
How about tactical Nukes for the commander? just a thought