yes, well, the flipside of this is that there's a tacit assumption that independent adults are capable of reviewing just about any material. that we shouldn't ban or censor things or limit expression. we read historical fiction and fantasy that talks about rape and incest and mass killings. isn't game of thrones deleterious for the imagination? a corrupting influence? who seriously entertains these beliefs? we as a society accept that, in terms of expression and imagination, the law should not interfere and the state should not choose.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I think the point I'm driving at, and I think Macbeth as well, is that there is reason to be concerned about young children's exposure to violent media. That's probably the simplest way of putting it.
You're right, people should probably pay attention to (sensible) ratings and use their brains when it comes to choosing games and movies for their kids to play and see. And also not let them munch an entire family sized bag of Ruffles.
I wouldn't even want a high schooler playing Air Port Massacre Simulator, regardless of whether MW2 was rated 17+ or teen.
i've seen plenty of things in art exhibitions and installations that are far more shocking than any videogame. the tacit assumption is that able-minded, of-age adults can freely contemplate these things. maybe it's voyeurism, maybe it's edifying and educational. but that's a different debate.
Last edited by uziq (2020-05-26 07:51:48)