It's not a perfectly random sample, no. A perfectly random sample would require calling people at random out of the phone book and having them come in for testing. Even then you have some bias because not everyone will agree to it. This is a fairly decent way to do it. Not perfect, but adequate for obtaining rough numbers.SuperJail Warden wrote:
I mean its not random sample. Is that the prefer science term? I majored in history.
It's the same idea as election polling. You call X% of houses representing the population at large. You don't call every single person and ask their opinion.
Last edited by Jay (4 years, 11 months ago)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat