it's a terrible analogy and makes no sense. protip: if you have to untie a mental knot and get out the history textbooks to even parse an analogy, it has NO function. they're supposed to shed insight and widen understanding of an issue, not give you facepalm or stroke.
where are BLM people intimidating anyone? protesting is NOT intimidation.
terrifying! thugs!
i can think of an example of an intimidating protest tactic:
where is anyone asking for SPECIAL privileges?
your rhetoric is lazy and disingenuous. people are asking to be treated equally. they are exercising their legal, enshrined right to protest. 99% of them are non-violent and non-intimidating. riots, burning, looting, etc, have accounted for a tiny, fringe, explosive minority of the protest movement, concentrated heavily in the days following george flloyd's murder. it is NOT the modus operandi of the movement; rioting and burning down property is NOT a BLM strategy. people have distanced themselves from and disclaimed that behaviour. what more do you want? how many more peaceful protest and assemblies do there have to be before you get the message? it's totally pointless because you simply don't pay attention to the vast majority of peaceful protests that go off without creating a sensational news headline: you aren't interested in their cause.
you are already isolated and paranoid. don't project quite so much. there are 'various ethnic groups' turning up in SUPPORT of BLM, dipshit. remember when you tried to make out that the native americans and latinx community were smarting at BLM's recent rise? then i showed you that they have all made public proclamations of support and solidarity with the movement? wooops! you look very, very silly.
where are BLM people intimidating anyone? protesting is NOT intimidation.
terrifying! thugs!
i can think of an example of an intimidating protest tactic:
where is anyone asking for SPECIAL privileges?
your rhetoric is lazy and disingenuous. people are asking to be treated equally. they are exercising their legal, enshrined right to protest. 99% of them are non-violent and non-intimidating. riots, burning, looting, etc, have accounted for a tiny, fringe, explosive minority of the protest movement, concentrated heavily in the days following george flloyd's murder. it is NOT the modus operandi of the movement; rioting and burning down property is NOT a BLM strategy. people have distanced themselves from and disclaimed that behaviour. what more do you want? how many more peaceful protest and assemblies do there have to be before you get the message? it's totally pointless because you simply don't pay attention to the vast majority of peaceful protests that go off without creating a sensational news headline: you aren't interested in their cause.
you are already isolated and paranoid. don't project quite so much. there are 'various ethnic groups' turning up in SUPPORT of BLM, dipshit. remember when you tried to make out that the native americans and latinx community were smarting at BLM's recent rise? then i showed you that they have all made public proclamations of support and solidarity with the movement? wooops! you look very, very silly.
Last edited by uziq (2020-08-05 02:53:13)
