what are you listening to right now?

2021-01-11 01:48:42

#6826

uziq: Member; +545|3979

Dilbert_X wrote:
uziq wrote:
oh look, a 10-minute tutorial from 2011.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67SVYuxooBg

it's almost like i know exactly what i'm talking about, and you have no FUCKING clue.

so if it takes '10-15 minutes' to do, as i said to pochsy in a post about 13 laborious, unnecessary posts ago, one would think they better be doing something strikingly bold and interesting with it, at least. there better be some pay-off, right? some point to it? oh, wait, pochsy's example mixed together the best-selling rap artist of last year with one of the most well-known electronic tunes of all time? wow, amazing. revelatory. i'm so glad this producer decided to click+drag two incredibly obvious, overplayed tunes together into a DAW. thank you sir, 10/10!
And how hard is it to produce your, um,music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5TGWtK70-E

you have literally no clue whatsoever what you’re talking about.

i honestly don’t know why you even pursue these conversations. you sound like a child.

have you ever opened music software in your life? ever used a synthesiser or a drum machine? ever even multi-tracked a recording on a 4-track? ever summed a mix? ever mastered a song?

did you even play any instruments in your childhood or growing up into the sad sack man you are?

why do you keep going on about ‘how difficult are things to make’ when you don’t know ANYTHING about these processes? lmao.

i just showed you how easy it is to ‘mash’ two songs together in software using a tool that literally does 95% of the work. i explained historically why mash-ups became popular, their proliferation with easy technology. and your answer? an old man making a fool of himself, yet again.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-11 02:00:26)

2021-01-11 01:53:23

#6827

uziq: Member; +545|3979

RTHKI wrote:
I like the last one. Forgot about Instra:mental.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjuBUzyyuJo

new dBridge album soon! first one in years

2021-01-11 05:01:36

#6828

uziq: Member; +545|3979

i actually really miss that era in UK music, instra:mental and the club autonomic broadcasts. london felt like it was taking off into another dimension then. sort of 2009 onwards for me, but think it started a few years earlier. totally new sounds and so much mystery and buzz about it.

so so nostalgic for me!

2021-01-11 16:33:17

#6829

SuperJail Warden: Gone Forever; +671|4246

Thanks Trump for bringing back this banger

Still was part of the Metal Gear Solid V soundtrack so this song reminds me of Phantom Pain.

2021-01-11 20:42:24

#6830

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,091|7298|PNW

Could they not get permission from a live artist, or was it not an official function.

2021-01-12 01:00:09

#6831

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,835|6632|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:
Dilbert_X wrote:
uziq wrote:
oh look, a 10-minute tutorial from 2011.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67SVYuxooBg

it's almost like i know exactly what i'm talking about, and you have no FUCKING clue.

so if it takes '10-15 minutes' to do, as i said to pochsy in a post about 13 laborious, unnecessary posts ago, one would think they better be doing something strikingly bold and interesting with it, at least. there better be some pay-off, right? some point to it? oh, wait, pochsy's example mixed together the best-selling rap artist of last year with one of the most well-known electronic tunes of all time? wow, amazing. revelatory. i'm so glad this producer decided to click+drag two incredibly obvious, overplayed tunes together into a DAW. thank you sir, 10/10!
And how hard is it to produce your, um,music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5TGWtK70-E
you have literally no clue whatsoever what you’re talking about.

i honestly don’t know why you even pursue these conversations. you sound like a child.

have you ever opened music software in your life? ever used a synthesiser or a drum machine? ever even multi-tracked a recording on a 4-track? ever summed a mix? ever mastered a song?

did you even play any instruments in your childhood or growing up into the sad sack man you are?

why do you keep going on about ‘how difficult are things to make’ when you don’t know ANYTHING about these processes? lmao.

i just showed you how easy it is to ‘mash’ two songs together in software using a tool that literally does 95% of the work. i explained historically why mash-ups became popular, their proliferation with easy technology. and your answer? an old man making a fool of himself, yet again.

https://vimeo.com/223378825

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYrQC-jWMFM

So we're agreed? Making a mashup is just as easy as producing the musical brain cancer you listen to?

Fuck Israel

2021-01-12 01:09:47

#6832

uziq: Member; +545|3979

that’s nice. move along.

2021-01-12 01:13:53

#6833

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,835|6632|eXtreme to the maX

And I was trying to be conciliatory.

Fuck Israel

2021-01-12 01:25:47

#6834

uziq: Member; +545|3979

that brain cancer won a grammy. so if the judges and fine folks on their board, who i’m sure are as ginger and liver-spotted as you are by this point, like it, i’m sure you can apply yourself.

i think it’s obvious that composing and producing just about any original song is an order of magnitude more creative, difficult, imaginative and all-round interesting to listen to than someone dragging two existing songs into a mash-up algorithm.

2021-01-12 02:32:15

#6835

uziq: Member; +545|3979

2021-01-12 16:23:14

#6836

SuperJail Warden: Gone Forever; +671|4246

This song was corny even back in 2004 but it is fun thinking back on what it was like to be 14

this is still fun

2021-01-12 22:50:46

#6837

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,835|6632|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:
that brain cancer won a grammy. so if the judges and fine folks on their board, who i’m sure are as ginger and liver-spotted as you are by this point, like it, i’m sure you can apply yourself.

Is this what winning a grammy looks like?

https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/1562161/lady-gaga-grammy-awards.jpg

LMAO

Fuck Israel

2021-01-13 00:21:26

#6838

uziq: Member; +545|3979

i was appealing to your own criteria of ‘success’, dipshit. clearly i do not give a fuck about grammy’s or the charts or the spotify 100 or anything.

did the 'ginger and liver-spotted judges' part of the post not make it obvious that i don't regard them as the most relevant arbiters of taste? jesus christ, you are lamentable.

Last edited by uziq (2021-01-13 01:20:50)

2021-01-13 02:18:35

#6839

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,835|6632|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:
i do not give a fuck about grammy’s or the charts or the spotify 100 or anything.

I thought for a minute there you were excited that the sort of stuff ambulance-chasing neurosurgeons would put on the market to drive up business got a bit of mainstream attention for a brief moment.

Fuck Israel

2021-01-13 02:37:16

#6840

uziq: Member; +545|3979

where have i mentioned, even in passing, in 15+ years on this forum, that 'oh this one is extra good because it won an award' or 'this one hit no. 1!'.

i am deeply invested in music, in 'scenes', from the ground-level up. what a gaggle of octogenarians in los angeles or wherever deem to be 'the best' is hardly a matter of interest to me.

it's funny though that lady gaga shares company with my 'modem music'. that's something for you to work out in your weird little value system, not me.

what's an ambulance-chasing neurosurgeon? a slightly confusing concept. are there many private neurosurgery clinics offering elective surgeries? you might need to sharpen your act a little, there's audible boos and hisses emanating from the crowd.

2021-01-13 02:43:16