'purer'? with a MIDI backing track made on a $15 budget and to 'evade' copyright?
pure shlock, lmao.
i get the idea of acoustic or acapella covers being a 'reduced' interpretation, less instrumentation, less ornamentation; more focus on the lyrics or the solo performance. that's fine, and there's a very long tradition of such things. there's even a rich history of bootlegs, live recordings, demo tapes, and so on, for any fan to pick over (look at someone like dylan, there's 100s of these things in circulation).
but cover bands and karaoke are 'working men's hall' dreck. how anyone can prefer the version of the song with the 'casio keyboard demo 3' backing track as opposed to the version, you know, recorded and produced with a multi-million-dollar budget and some of the world's best mixing and mastering engineers ... yeah, i'll take the 'as intended' song over the 'pinoy wedding' version, thanks.
Last edited by uziq (2025-04-02 03:03:18)