Pages: 1 2 3

 

Poll

Do you agree that AF be free for enduring the all the problems in BF2?

Yes, AF should be free I have been patient long enough46%46% - 117
Yes, AF should be free anyway28%28% - 73
No, we must pay for AF regardless of the game problems24%24% - 63
Total: 253
2006-06-03 13:38:21
mKmalfunction
Infamous meleeKings cult. Est. 2003 B.C.
+82|7025|The Lost Highway

CommieChipmunk wrote:

ya, theres no way in hell we would every get anything free out of EA games... except maybe a free gun unlock...
Nah, they'd probally just add a couple of maps with the unlock, and charge you 10 bucks for it.

EA are greedier than hell. Example, The Sims 2. They realease the game with bare bone minimums for 50 bucks. Then every other month they release an expansion with the stuff people actually want to do.

And must I mention the mockery they made of The Godfather?

FUCK EA. I'll play BF2 'till I find something else, but I ain't giving 'em anymore of my money, ever. I thought Valve was bad, but they ain't got shit on EA.
2006-06-03 13:40:49
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7247

TheMurf wrote:

Patches are free. Free samples are free (Those are but two things in life that are free!).
*sigh*  samples are not free, they are built into the cost of the product.  Patches are there to keep you addicted to the game and make you spend money on expansion and booster packs.

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-06-03 13:43:13)

2006-06-03 13:46:02
coreinflames
Member
+12|7130
I am sure ea is very nervous right now, lol...

That Patch was 2 cents Short of everyones Bf2 icon blowing off there desktop screen.

Question to Ea,

I didnt buy Euro Force but i am thinking of buying  Armored Fury,  is that going to effect my patching???  (i hope you address that question when you release armored fury)

Last edited by coreinflames (2006-06-03 13:46:30)

2006-06-03 13:46:55
BallisticallyYours
Member
+23|7116|Chicago, IL
How about they recommit to upgrade, repair, and support the original BF2.... and more urban combat maps.
2006-06-03 22:08:42
Sarrk
O-O-O A-O A
+788|7141|Brisbane, Australia

Talon wrote:

£6 isnt free? It costs £6 to see a film at a cinema, eat lunch at a cafe... and you think its too much for tons of hours on a computer game?
Those are some pretty frickin expensive movies!
2006-06-03 22:14:10
THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|7256|AUS, Canberra
why do people always forget that ea is not a charity?

why the fuck would they bother going to any effort to make it to give it away?

i know alot of people have troubles with this game. but think about how many play it. its a minority i assure you that actually give a second thought to problems with it.
2006-06-03 22:25:23
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,401|7260|Noizyland

It was pretty effing ghey that they decided to charge us for stuff that would have normally be included in a patch. I reckon that they should wake up and realise that they didn't bluff us. If they refuse to let us off with a freebie I think that's reasonable, but if they still want to release a legitimate addon and get people to pay for it, they should at leat have the integrity to release a hard copy so we don't have to rely on some fucking buggy downloader.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
2006-06-03 22:30:06
Answeller
Usual Suspect
+16|7184|İstanbul,Türkiye
10 bucks isnt that much but im not gonna buy the AF, besides SF and EF are more than enough for me anyway.
2006-06-03 22:32:37
DeadboyUSMC
Member
+65|7185|NCFSU2
Cheese.
2006-06-03 22:32:44
TrollmeaT
Aspiring Objectivist
+492|7158|Colorado
It should be free but then we could forget about anymore boosters...which might not be a bad thing.
2006-06-03 22:37:41
Xietsu
Banned
+50|7042

mKmalfunction wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

ya, theres no way in hell we would every get anything free out of EA games... except maybe a free gun unlock...
Nah, they'd probally just add a couple of maps with the unlock, and charge you 10 bucks for it.

EA are greedier than hell. Example, The Sims 2. They realease the game with bare bone minimums for 50 bucks. Then every other month they release an expansion with the stuff people actually want to do.

And must I mention the mockery they made of The Godfather?

FUCK EA. I'll play BF2 'till I find something else, but I ain't giving 'em anymore of my money, ever. I thought Valve was bad, but they ain't got shit on EA.
Quake Wars: Enemy Territory dude. It's gonna' be the next best FPS, if not the MMORPG Huxley.
2006-06-04 02:43:13
Avarice
Member
+41|7058|London, UK
Yes I would, I think we should be given a free mod (a DECENT [WORKING] mod) made by themselves. But I doubt this will happen.

What they can do though, and is equally as good for me, is make a 3rd tier unlock system available for everyone consisting of EF and AF weapons. They can replace the L96A1 with something else from SF. I think that is a more logical and fair response to the trouble they've been giving us. Not only would it be free to make, but it would restore people's faith within EA and their products, I know that I may be persuaded into buying 2142 if they show us in bf2 that they acknowledge the issues and give us something in return, as a show of goodwill.
2006-06-04 03:11:08
beerface702
Member
+65|7179|las vegas
Shit in one hand.....

you know how it goes.


wont happen bud.
2006-06-04 06:50:46
BallisticallyYours
Member
+23|7116|Chicago, IL

Answeller wrote:

10 bucks isnt that much but im not gonna buy the AF, besides SF and EF are more than enough for me anyway.
I agree, I stopeed at SF because the servers running the maps are too few (Ranked) compared to BF2, I merely wanted more guns... It doesn't matter, its only $10.
2006-06-04 06:53:33
[LdB:MaxX]
Noobs: For Dummies
+2|7034
Although i would love a free expansion, its not happening jan. They wouldnt put all those man hours into an expansion just for free.
2006-06-04 06:58:30
ECH
Member
+50|7129|Some where near you
Can I ask a question?
Why should we pay for a booster pack when it's rumored that BF2 will die once 2142 comes out this fall?
Making AF only useful for a few months if it's in fact a popular game to play.  From what I have seen more people play SF then they do EF (at least from my end).  This made SF one of the most popular add ons to date.

If bugs are fixed and AF is just as popular it will lasts longer then just a few weeks. Cutting it short  to make room for 2142 will anger a lot of users.

Last edited by ECH (2006-06-04 07:00:10)

2006-06-04 07:02:27
[LdB:MaxX]
Noobs: For Dummies
+2|7034
Put it this way

Well you spend money on an expansion for a game thats a year old, and already had 2 expansions that kind of failed. OR spend That money (Plus a bit more) on a completley new game, with new features etc?
2006-06-04 07:09:46
ECH
Member
+50|7129|Some where near you

[LdB:MaxX] wrote:

Put it this way

Well you spend money on an expansion for a game thats a year old, and already had 2 expansions that kind of failed. OR spend That money (Plus a bit more) on a completley new game, with new features etc?
Word got out a long time ago that SF is a good game to play.  It can be purchased in the store and you have a visible, tangible product that you don't have to download.  I believe this is one of the reasons why it's more popular then EF. 

As a matter of fact SF still remains problem free to date.  I have read no reports of CTD, lost connections nor high pings with SF, PERIOD!  However, the same cannot be said with BF2/EF.  A few others as well as myself have yet experienced a problem while playing SF.  All I can say is that having it's own interface was better trade off then anyone would have ever thought.

So will I buy a possble buggy AF over a bug free SF...nope!

The question is simple, why is SF (just an expansion) have less problems then BF2?  More and more people are reinstalling SF because word of mouth is getting out that SF has yet to fail them.  So, I ask you a simple question will you play a BF2 that is littered with bugs (CTD, High Ping, Lost connection, messed up browser, etc) or play SF which doesn't have these problems?  The answer is simple.

Last edited by ECH (2006-06-04 08:02:09)

2006-06-04 07:49:19
BabySpinach
Phone Spammer
+207|7077|Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
This thread shows that noobs will do anything to get something free.
2006-06-04 11:19:46
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7176|Tampa Bay Florida
it's TEN bucks! 

If you're willing to spend 50 bucks on a game when it comes out, then you should have no problem buying something for 10.
2006-06-04 11:24:05
-Solv3r-
Heia den som vinner!
+115|7043|Oslo, Norway
It's should be free! They've destroyed the game with the new patch. I can barley connect to a server without BF2 crashing to desktop.:S We should get something back for standing out with THEIR mastakes!
2006-06-04 12:57:16
Wasder
Resident Emo Hater
+139|7161|Moscow, Russia
I want my 1.22 back. Better yet, 1.12 back! And I don't need any fucking AF or WTF, I want by BF2 to work properly! I don't want those frickin cars dropping from the sky, I want my verifying client data times to be 30 secs max, as they were before, not 5 fuckin minutes!
2006-06-04 14:23:58
Avarice
Member
+41|7058|London, UK

BabySpinach13 wrote:

This thread shows that noobs will do anything to get something free.
This post shows that trolls will do anything to get an argument started.
2006-06-07 16:35:01
BallisticallyYours
Member
+23|7116|Chicago, IL

-Solv3r- wrote:

It's should be free! They've destroyed the game with the new patch. I can barley connect to a server without BF2 crashing to desktop.:S We should get something back for standing out with THEIR mastakes!
Dude, youve played 331 hrs... the game was 50 bucks, thats .15 an hour.... go update your computer, Ram or something, 10 percent of all players experience problems. Usually driver problems.
2006-06-07 17:27:51
blackcracka
Member
+18|7256
I remember when patches which included a new map were obviously free.  Now, we get an inferior product (crashy, glitchy, and not well tested) and they expect us to fork out more money every time they patch it. 


It would have been nice if EA was honest upfront and told us how much it is going to cost if we continue to play the game. 

I would have respected EA a lot more if they just said BF2 was going to cost 100 dollars and you are going to get lots of new maps/weapons/vehicles in each patch.  Even if they TOLD us there are going to be 3,4,..10 "expansions" that we are going to have to pay for, that would have been respectable also.



EA seems to be acting very sly about getting money out of our pockets. I am definately going to think twice about investing in EA's products in the future.


blah. my 2cents

 

Pages: 1 2 3

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard