New Booster (Naval Thunder)

2006-06-06 11:10:41

#1

Cohammer: Member; +61|7023

i think there needs to be ships just like in BF1942, a battle like midway would be so cool in BF2. and subs, long gone are the days of ship to ship combat from 1942. man that was fun

thats my rant

fixed

Last edited by Cohammer (2006-06-06 15:44:07)

2006-06-06 11:12:43

#2

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7247

Cohammer wrote:
i think there needs to be ships just like in BF2

huh?

2006-06-06 11:12:48

#3

0akleaves: Member; +183|7098|Newcastle UK

gd idea +1

You have to learn the rules of the game and then you have to play better than anyone else.

2006-06-06 11:13:17

#4

.:ronin:.|Patton: Respekct dad i love u always; +946|7294|Marathon, Florida Keys

that would sound cool. mabie throw some cruise missles in.

https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg

2006-06-06 11:14:35

#5

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7103|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

it does sound cool, i just wish you could swin a little faster...

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2006-06-06 11:34:58

#6

aggressor: Member; +0|7028

I like the idea of a new Iwo Jima for BF2 with a carrier and a Battleship (or upto date warship)
that would be cool imo

Midway was kind of boring on bf1942 - Wake/Iwo Jima were the best by far

I'm a n00b so what do I know

2006-06-06 11:37:31

#7

=|A mere Shadow|=: The Anarchist; +121|7111|Britain and Damn proud of it!

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
that would sound cool. mabie throw some cruise missles in.

2006-06-06 11:41:34

#8

Cursed You: Member; +64|7073|Idaho

If I had a choice to bring a battle back from the dead that is 1942, I would bring Berlin. I know theres a mod out already but I mean a ranked Berlin. I played Berlin for about... oh... 8... months...

Iwo Jima would be cool, the cruise missles just OHK'ing everything. Didnt like any of the desert maps. Too wide open. I loved Stalingrad though.

I dont know how they'd work that into being BF2'ish.

2006-06-06 11:42:59

#9

DomeH: Member; +1|7025|Germany

Sounds cool good Idea

Whats about two carriers against each other.

2006-06-06 11:43:12

#10

k1LLr_M: Prone to Own; +118|7078|Houston, TX

That would be cool...I wonder what the MEC carrier would look like, if they even have any at all...

2006-06-06 11:44:00

#11

Sgt.Davi: Touches Himself At Night.; +300|7128|England

WTF you stole mine and Talons ideas you bizzlenatch

2006-06-06 11:46:39

#12

crimson_grunt: Shitty Disposition (apparently); +214|7139|Teesside, UK

Lots of people have been talking about the epic ship and sub battles in 1942 and I'd love to see those. Can anyone point me to any sites with videos of them please?

2006-06-06 12:04:00

#13

aggressor: Member; +0|7028

Cursed You wrote:
I loved Stalingrad though.
.

me too

played Stalingrad in many Clan matches for [KsR]

Our home map - nades everywhere

2006-06-06 12:46:36

#14

killer21: Because f*ck you that's why.; +400|7076|Reisterstown, MD

I think he means like the carriers in 1942.

2006-06-06 12:48:04

#15

WilhelmSissener: Banned; +557|7218|Oslo, Norway

A mere Shadow|= wrote:
.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
that would sound cool. mabie throw some cruise missles in.

2006-06-06 12:53:41

#16

2ndLt.Tucker: If you can read this, your already dead; +33|7168|Stillwater, Ok

Not a bad idea...would be interesting as hell to have some naval battles.

2006-06-06 13:03:32

#17

Wasder: Resident Emo Hater; +139|7160|Moscow, Russia

LOL

2006-06-06 13:17:03

#18

spacebandit72: Dead Meat; +121|7216|Michigan

I think it would be fun. 1942 was very cool.

Naval Thunder sounds bad though. All I can see is a huge bellybutton and little army guys running on it trying to capture neutral lint flags!!!

2006-06-06 13:18:58

#19

{B-T}<babacanosh>: Member; +31|7087

I Think There Should Be Flame Throwers!!!!!!

2006-06-06 13:43:08

#20

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7247

I think there should be naked chicks ready to service your e-penis at the snap of a finger.

2006-06-06 13:58:21

#21

Turtle: Member; +7|7242|Boulder, CO

usmarine2005 wrote:
Cohammer wrote:
i think there needs to be ships just like in BF2
huh?

He meant 1942 obviously, not much in the way of naval battles, but you could control the carrier and it had artillery cannons so you could shell the beach.

2006-06-06 14:05:50

#22

Turtle: Member; +7|7242|Boulder, CO

{B-T}<babacanosh> wrote:
I Think There Should Be Flame Throwers!!!!!!

Oh man there would be sooo much whining. Wah flame whores just spam fire everywhere, NERF!
I loved them after they got patched in COD, lotsa fun clearing a room full of fools.

2006-06-06 14:08:25

#23

rustynutz: I am British!; +124|7168|England and damn proud

Wasder wrote:
LOL

yea i remember that, that was hilarious

2006-06-06 14:10:29

#24

Tushers: Noctwisaskfirtush; +224|7170|Some where huntin in Wisconsin

It Would Be Nice, But I Have Exams Tomarrow So I Yea. Tomarrow It Will Be A Good Idea! +1 For You!

2006-06-06 14:23:01

#25

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7247

Turtle wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
Cohammer wrote:
i think there needs to be ships just like in BF2
huh?
He meant 1942 obviously, not much in the way of naval battles, but you could control the carrier and it had artillery cannons so you could shell the beach.

Not obvious to me, I never played 1942.

BF2S Forums New Booster (Naval Thunder)

Cohammer wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

Cursed You wrote:

A mere Shadow|= wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Cohammer wrote:

{B-T}<babacanosh> wrote:

Wasder wrote:

Turtle wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Cohammer wrote:

Board footer