i want battlefield sized maps. like it takes you an hour to walk across it
Theirs only so many wars that can be covered in a franchise.
So far, the only war they havent offically tried is WWI.
They have done WWII, Vietnam, Desert Storm/Iraq and now Futuristic.
Like i said, only so many wars can be covered before they cant make viable new games that are still interesting.
So far, the only war they havent offically tried is WWI.
They have done WWII, Vietnam, Desert Storm/Iraq and now Futuristic.
Like i said, only so many wars can be covered before they cant make viable new games that are still interesting.
LoLtheDude5B wrote:
http://www.xboxed360.net/xb/images/battlefield3.jpg
I can imagine the gameplay.
2 player maps only with bunkers that got a red button in it. First one to log in wins....
YOU GOT NUKED!!!
2142 is BF3. Its like Vietnam, hopefully they'll make it for BF3.
I think thats right, if i'm not, we're screwd
I think thats right, if i'm not, we're screwd
when they release 2142 u noobCohammer wrote:
What time period would u like to see Battlefield 3 in?
Id like to see it in modern just like BF2 but have some fake slighly futuristic weapons.
But on the eve of DX10 full destructable stuff we could have fully designed inside and walls being able to blow open, this would revoultionize the BF series
hey buddy, was Battlefield Vietnam considered Battlefield 2? Yeah, so shut up{A.K.A}LordBeefman wrote:
when they release 2142 u noobCohammer wrote:
What time period would u like to see Battlefield 3 in?
Id like to see it in modern just like BF2 but have some fake slighly futuristic weapons.
But on the eve of DX10 full destructable stuff we could have fully designed inside and walls being able to blow open, this would revoultionize the BF series
No widescreen support? Are you serious? How the heck do you explain how that can't be when I was at Circuit City a couple of months back and played on a computer which had Quake 4 and Bf2 installed, I played Bf2 and the computer had a widescreen monitor hooked up to it. I loved it, my peripheal vision worked so much better to see those guys lurking around the corners much easier.Impaqt wrote:
If you guys are counting BF:2142 as BF3 you need to check your math.
BF:V, BF:SW, and any other expansion EA realeased for 42 needs to be counted.....
I would assume by BF3 he means the 3rd BF ENGINE.
2142 is a MOD. It will run onthe same Engine as BF2. Which means no Widescreen support, Same Physics with no PhysX Support, Samne bugs, etc etc etc.....
OK, so here's the list I have now...
· Naval warfare
· Ability to cook grenades
· Greater vehicle selection
· Ability to throw back a grenade
· All buildings should be enterable
· More utility for unfavored classes
· Minimum arming distance for rifle nades
· Integrated, dynamic melee combat system
· Outfit/physical appearance customization
· You should be able to dig trenches for cover
· All buildings should be completely destructable
· Weapon customization/minor modification capability
· Larger number of combatants in an embattled environment
· Time shifts throughout playtime (dawn, morning, noon, dusk, night, etc)
· Tanks shouldn't be impeded on the minor hinge of a corner (corner should crumble)
· Realistic weather affects (that alter, say, your player's footing on a certain surface)
I say we rally for these in a new BF game at EA forums! lol.
· Naval warfare
· Ability to cook grenades
· Greater vehicle selection
· Ability to throw back a grenade
· All buildings should be enterable
· More utility for unfavored classes
· Minimum arming distance for rifle nades
· Integrated, dynamic melee combat system
· Outfit/physical appearance customization
· You should be able to dig trenches for cover
· All buildings should be completely destructable
· Weapon customization/minor modification capability
· Larger number of combatants in an embattled environment
· Time shifts throughout playtime (dawn, morning, noon, dusk, night, etc)
· Tanks shouldn't be impeded on the minor hinge of a corner (corner should crumble)
· Realistic weather affects (that alter, say, your player's footing on a certain surface)
I say we rally for these in a new BF game at EA forums! lol.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 04:50:03)
id like to see beach landings like a future omaha
no, no you dont, not after squad hopping was removed. just imagine, you literally walk 20 minuets to your next command post only to have a tank obliterate you. you just got yourself another 20 minuet walkstryyker wrote:
i want battlefield sized maps. like it takes you an hour to walk across it
I think he might be only saying that, were there to be more of a selection of vehicles and a larger number of combatants. Who knows...
hmmm i like ur idea, but can EA make such an engine with destrustable things? idk.....
but wow, i can imagine it right now, blowing up a wall so my tank can get threw........
Anyways i think the Cryengine2 engine is capable of what your talking about. So if EA buys Crytek, they got there engin(and they would destroy crysis : ( )...
but wow, i can imagine it right now, blowing up a wall so my tank can get threw........
Anyways i think the Cryengine2 engine is capable of what your talking about. So if EA buys Crytek, they got there engin(and they would destroy crysis : ( )...
Last edited by Maj.Do (2006-06-07 22:48:04)
speaking of tanks, i want them to make them able to go up hills that are steeper than 20 degrees and (as stated above) through corners and over light posts. i hate it when i get stuck on a builiding corner or light post
agreed!!11Impaqt wrote:
If you guys are counting BF:2142 as BF3 you need to check your math.
BF:V, BF:SW, and any other expansion EA realeased for 42 needs to be counted.....
I would assume by BF3 he means the 3rd BF ENGINE.
2142 is a MOD. It will run onthe same Engine as BF2. Which means no Widescreen support, Same Physics with no PhysX Support, Samne bugs, etc etc etc.....
2142 will be only a MOD, but EA will still sell it and get lots of $$ from n00bs!
Better stick to BF2!!
>>>BF3 Central<<<
id like to see 200 people on BF3, it would be fun, but of course larger maps and more vechs. and something to get rid of TKing for planes
well, i dont think you could stop people actually tking to get in it but they could stop the foce tks by not having roadkills count in a jet.Cohammer wrote:
id like to see 200 people on BF3, it would be fun, but of course larger maps and more vechs. and something to get rid of TKing for planes
i suppose this could be exploited, but i mean how many people are going to drive around the runway trying to kill people
its war. there are no boundariesBolvisOculus wrote:
no, no you dont, not after squad hopping was removed. just imagine, you literally walk 20 minuets to your next command post only to have a tank obliterate you. you just got yourself another 20 minuet walkstryyker wrote:
i want battlefield sized maps. like it takes you an hour to walk across it