Did they edit the M16 in this patch?

2006-06-09 17:39:39

#1

Vintageologist: Tankbuster; +31|7115|Vienna, Austria

Wow... I just had one of this... "You die! And you die! And you! And you die too!"-Moments after picking up what always was the least desireble kit for me before... the Medic/M16 one... I have to ask, has the M16 been changed or have I been using it wrong before as I was just mowing trough everything with ease?! (no this is not a thread to promote how 1337 I am, rather how cool I find the M16 kit now)

2006-06-09 17:40:28

#2

k1LLr_M: Prone to Own; +118|6951|Houston, TX

I've pwned with it like that before long before the patch. It's a great weapon if you use it right.

2006-06-09 17:45:53

#3

Vintageologist: Tankbuster; +31|7115|Vienna, Austria

Yeah I somehow always thought it lacked something... but due to the high ROF of the bursts you can easily put quite a lot of bullets into the enemy within a short time, which is especially useful in CQB...

2006-06-09 17:48:09

#4

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7201|Reykjavík, Iceland.

Meh, it's still crap to me, I just hate burst mode, if it was the M16A3 with full auto I would be digging it.

2006-06-09 17:49:22

#5

[killer]manxs: Member; +148|7006|San Diego C.A.

To me i love the m16, reminds me of a real battle ground

2006-06-09 17:50:56

#6

Viper38: Member; +118|7028

I'm not sure its been changed but the M-16 is my favourite assault weapon

2006-06-09 17:51:32

#7

Freakpookie: Member; +0|6897

I have always found that The medic gun...IS the best when you want to go out on a killing spree....lol...
I mean i find it to be extremely accurate...regardless of whether you stand...crouch...or prone...
Medic...i think is that easiest kit to use when you want combat points...

[url=http://www.bf2player.com/index.php?page=stats&account=52232278][img]http://www.bf2player.com/sig/52232278-3959.png[/img][/url]
IM A PRO MED.... Arn't you proud of me

2006-06-09 18:12:06

#8

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7201|Reykjavík, Iceland.

To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard

2006-06-09 19:11:56

#9

Rumfuddle: Member; +14|7075

Your skills have probably improved since the last time you picked up the gun. I revisited the medic/m16 kit after swearing off it 15,000 points ago and now it works like a charm.

2006-06-09 19:25:05

#10

JohnnyBlanco: Member; +44|6928|England

PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard

Jesus, some people. +1 in the post.

2006-06-09 19:53:27

#11

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7032|Canberra, AUS

I pwned with it before the patch. Seems the same.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-06-09 20:27:41

#12

DirtyMexican: I knife Generals; +278|6895|Search Whore killing fields

PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard

I evend it out for ya

2006-06-09 20:55:24

#13

Phrozenbot: Member; +632|6973|do not disturb

PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard

While you are correct, I didn't know the M16A3 was full auto. I thought right after the M16A2, it was just from burst.

And EA is just plain stupid. The Marines are using the M16A4, not the M16A2, which doesn't have those nice add-on capabilities like the M203.

Fixed, and thanks for the neg ya jerk. It will come ten fold on you, I promise.

Last edited by Hellogoodsir (2006-06-10 11:22:57)

2006-06-09 21:05:11

#14

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|7047|Tampa Bay Florida

PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard

ROFL, what a tard. He doesn't even realize that soldiers over in Iraq are using the A4 version, too? lol

2006-06-09 21:19:21

#15

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7032|Canberra, AUS

Spearhead wrote:
PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard
ROFL, what a tard. He doesn't even realize that soldiers over in Iraq are using the A4 version, too? lol

Shouldn't we be using that (A4) instead of the A2?

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-06-09 21:28:34

#16

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6980|Little Bentcock

I would like to have seen the (A4) as a new unlock for AF

2006-06-09 21:37:21

#17

DirtyMexican: I knife Generals; +278|6895|Search Whore killing fields

wow, I got a negative now? Thats funny. Leave you name. I hate these damn kids

2006-06-10 00:08:41

#18

Coolbeano: Level 13.5 BF2S Ninja Penguin Sensei; +378|7121

Spark wrote:
Spearhead wrote:
PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard
ROFL, what a tard. He doesn't even realize that soldiers over in Iraq are using the A4 version, too? lol
Shouldn't we be using that (A4) instead of the A2?

I guess DICE didn't really think about that. Otherwise they would've put in the HK 416 or (i wish) an M8 for the Specops.

2006-06-10 00:39:15

#19

Erwin_Rommel188: Member; +59|7042|Seattle

Hellogoodsir wrote:
PBAsydney wrote:
To whoever gave me -1 stating there is no such things M16A3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_%28rifle%29#M16A3

Do your research first smacktard
While you are correct, I didn't know the M16A3 was full auto. I thought right after the M1A2, it was just from burst.

And EA is just plain stupid. The Marines are using the M1A4, not the M1A2, which doesn't have those nice add-on capabilities like the M203.

M1A2 = Tank

M16A2 = assault rifle

etc.

Boy that's funny to read

2006-06-10 04:10:28

#20

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7201|Reykjavík, Iceland.

USMC should have the M16A4 true.

And the USN in SF should have the M16A3, the auto version instead of the M16A2 (Medic)

2006-06-10 04:19:46

#21

{BMF}*Frank_The_Tank: U.S. > Iran; +497|6935|Florida

I think the M16 is the same. It works the same for me.

2006-06-10 06:34:18

#22

DirtyMexican: I knife Generals; +278|6895|Search Whore killing fields

I think the M4 should have a nade launcher

2006-06-10 09:43:32

#23

Vintageologist: Tankbuster; +31|7115|Vienna, Austria

Coolbeano wrote:
Spark wrote:
Spearhead wrote:

ROFL, what a tard. He doesn't even realize that soldiers over in Iraq are using the A4 version, too? lol
Shouldn't we be using that (A4) instead of the A2?
I guess DICE didn't really think about that. Otherwise they would've put in the HK 416 or (i wish) an M8 for the Specops.

The M8... or better XM8 is actually on hold because it was just being evaluated and now they have made another competition AFAIK.

2006-06-10 09:50:02

#24

Vintageologist: Tankbuster; +31|7115|Vienna, Austria

PBAsydney wrote:
USMC should have the M16A4 true.

And the USN in SF should have the M16A3, the auto version instead of the M16A2 (Medic)

Or the M4A1 cause they are SEALs...

Last edited by Vintageologist (2006-06-10 09:53:44)

2006-06-10 09:54:58

#25

C.Schaffer: Member; +19|6956|Sweden

gaaaah.....funny weapon talk

BF2S Forums Did they edit the M16 in this patch?

PBAsydney wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Spark wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Hellogoodsir wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Coolbeano wrote:

Spark wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Board footer