Today I was looking at the top 10 players in the world(-=RD=-Volx,{TA}FireStorm,BlaZiN.uk,Inc|LoKi,ect.) and I came to the conclusion that Inc|LoKi is not only a higher rank than -=RD=-Volx, {TA}FireStorm ,BlaZiN.uk but he has more awards. Why shouldn't people with the highest rank and most awards be #1 on the charts. who cares about points? http://bf2s.com/player/43457727/ -=RD=-Volx has no were near the same amount of awards and he is a lower rank than http://bf2s.com/player/44914749/ Inc|LoKi.
anyone feel that Inc|LoKi or people like him should be #1 instead of -=RD=-Volx
http://bf2s.com/compare/43457727,44914749 look at the comparison
anyone feel that Inc|LoKi or people like him should be #1 instead of -=RD=-Volx
http://bf2s.com/compare/43457727,44914749 look at the comparison
Last edited by STAPES87 (2006-06-11 08:48:26)