How should our global rank be interpreted?

Pages: 1

Index »
Games »
Battlefield Series »
Battlefield 2 »
How should our global rank be interpreted?

Poll

By our rank or buy our points

Rank	69%	69% - 59
Points (Global Score)	30%	30% - 26
Total: 85

2006-06-12 10:53:34

Samtheman53: Banned; +346|6965|UK

We all know at the moment your global rank is decided up on the amout of points (Global Score) you have.
Do any of you think it would be better if it was decided depending on our rank?

eg. a General with 200,000 would be higher on the leader board than a Colonel with 250,000 because of his rank.

Obviously there is no way EA will change this but the majority of the top 10 are Medics/Karkand/Tank whores with hardly any variety of medals and ribbons where as there are Generals who have tried all aspects of the game and got many ribbons and medals but none of them are near the top 3 players of the game.

2006-06-12 10:54:31

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|6897|UK

There should be a different leaderboard done by ranks in BFHQ

2006-06-12 10:55:15

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|6888|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Rank. Because of the "whores" that fill the top ten.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2006-06-12 10:56:39

Samtheman53: Banned; +346|6965|UK

Kmal1 wrote:
Rank. Because of the "whores" that fill the top ten.

Thats what i thought and the reason why i created this poll

2006-06-12 10:58:35

fierce: I love [fiSh]; +167|6838

Rank and inside by score.

2006-06-12 11:00:09

masterofflama: Member; +19|6854|European Battlefield Command

i don't want to buy my points Samtheman53

2006-06-12 11:02:46

Chillin&killin: Member; +27|6945|Manchester,England

rank as that is what its about so a colonel beats a general for commander if he has more points?

2006-06-12 11:18:22

Cbass: Kick His Ass!; +371|6964|Howell, Mi USA

Kmal1 wrote:
Rank. Because of the "whores" that fill the top ten.

Exactly right. Whats the point of earning General rank if the medic/ammo point farmers will pwn u for the top spot anyway.

https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png

2006-06-13 12:33:57

Samtheman53: Banned; +346|6965|UK

EDIT: I dealeted the post because I replied to the wronf topic

Last edited by Samtheman53 (2006-06-13 12:35:09)

2006-06-13 12:45:32

My_pet_squirrel: Have you seen my nutz?; +126|6890

masterofflama wrote:
i don't want to buy my points Samtheman53

lol +1 exactly what i was thinking commming into this poll

2007-03-05 14:17:12

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|6888|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

revived.... hey look, i searched, zomg im a necro!!11 stfu all of u people like that. i have something to say and i cant make all of u happy so i decided to follow the rules.

anyway, i restate what i said earlier ^^ it should have been rank, and rank -- > then points. so #1 would be the 4 star general with the most points.

any thing else?

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-03-05 15:59:03

Sgt. Sergio Bennet 3rd: Member; +169|7016|Mexico City

i think EA/DICE should have left the requirement that to be a 4 * general you had to be expert at all AND also, a certain amount of points.
You can see Weed´vehic stats, you can call that "the #1 player in the world?

2007-03-05 16:00:56

ig: This topic seems to have no actual posts; +1,199|6792

you should all die for caring

2007-03-05 16:04:26

im_in_heaven: Member; +27|6858

I think that to be a general you should have to have every medal and every award.

2007-03-05 21:19:08

InjectionNZ: Member; +1|6559|New Zealand

im_in_heaven wrote:
I think that to be a general you should have to have every medal and every award.

you have to have all veteran + and be in the top 50 to get the full rank

2007-03-05 23:02:58

Mouse315: Bash.org Junkie; +105|6790

im_in_heaven wrote:
I think that to be a general you should have to have every medal and every award.

You practically used to, back when gold badges were worth something.

Medals were always just for the shiny factor though.

2007-03-05 23:16:18

[pt] KEIOS: srs bsns; +231|6922|pimelteror.de

Des.Kmal wrote:
Rank. Because of the "whores" that fill the top ten.

2007-03-06 01:29:10

Nikola Bathory: Karkand T-90 0wnage; +163|7056|Bulgaria

Points, rank - it's the same. A rank means you have a certain number of points, right?
So, what's the problem???? I don't get it
oh noes

>>>BF3 Central<<<

2007-03-06 01:33:06

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6660

I pay people to waste time on my account so, in a way, I buy my points.

J/K. I think the first thing to look at is the time, then the KDR, then the Teamkills/Damage.

2007-03-06 13:00:06

im_in_heaven: Member; +27|6858

InjectionNZ wrote:
im_in_heaven wrote:
I think that to be a general you should have to have every medal and every award.
you have to have all veteran + and be in the top 50 to get the full rank

Yes i know but its nto enough to have all veterans. Veterans are pretty basic.

Pages: 1

Index »
Games »
Battlefield Series »
Battlefield 2 »
How should our global rank be interpreted?

Board footer

Jump to

BF2S Forums How should our global rank be interpreted?

Poll

Kmal1 wrote:

Kmal1 wrote:

masterofflama wrote:

im_in_heaven wrote:

im_in_heaven wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

InjectionNZ wrote:

im_in_heaven wrote:

Board footer