Poll

tank sights?

Usmc M1a245%45% - 40
Mec T-9024%24% - 21
Pla29%29% - 26
Total: 87
jkohlc
2142th Whore
+214|7127|Singapore
ok....what tank sights u like?

Last edited by jkohlc (2006-06-15 10:43:28)

l41e
Member
+677|7249

PLA, gives me a better idea of drop and where the MG will hit.
acEofspadEs6313
Shiny! Let's be bad guys.
+102|7293|NAS Jacksonville, Florida
1) Type 98
2) T-90
3) M1A2
bigp66
Member
+63|7149|memphfrica-memphis,TN
the T-90 sucks balls the PLA one is not bad and the Abrams is the best because of the setup of the horizontal lines to help aim shots and the circle with the dot is best for aiming the mg
Jussimies
Finnish commander whore
+76|7185|Finland
T-90 or M1A2. I just don't like about Type 98.
Squidward
Member
+3|7130|NC
I like the M1 as far as sights go.  But in my opinion, it's got the weakest armor.  Have you guys noticed that?  Or is it just me?
bigp66
Member
+63|7149|memphfrica-memphis,TN

Squidward wrote:

I like the M1 as far as sights go.  But in my opinion, it's got the weakest armor.  Have you guys noticed that?  Or is it just me?
it's just you all the tanks and apcs in the game have the same armor....if it were real then teh m1a2 would have the best everything
thanks to the fag who gave me negative karma one this posts you hurt me E feelings and thank you because i like negative karma
and no 2142 will not kick ass it will I repeat WILL suck ass....that is for whoever gave me neg saying that 2142 will kick ass

Last edited by bigp66 (2006-06-23 10:14:02)

Squidward
Member
+3|7130|NC
Really?  I must be terrible then.  So where is the best place to aim when going head to head against another tank?  Is it better to aim for the tracks?  Or the turret?
bigp66
Member
+63|7149|memphfrica-memphis,TN

Squidward wrote:

Really?  I must be terrible then.  So where is the best place to aim when going head to head against another tank?  Is it better to aim for the tracks?  Or the turret?
tracks that is where almost every good tanker aims for that and the rear
Squidward
Member
+3|7130|NC
That's what I've always thought and done.  But then I watched the video trailer to Armored Fury and it shows to Anti-Tank guys aiming for the turret.  Thought maybe there was something I didn't know.

Thanks for the info.
InviSniper
The first true Sniper.
+95|7245|Cumberland, MD, USA
I'm not a fan of the M1A1; it's sight are too bunched and it takes damage on large bumps.

I like the T-90; open sights, moves quickly, and doesn't take damage from bumps.
Deaths_hand
Member
+3|7128|Canada
what no Leopard II, come on... although out of the basic tanks, i do enjoy using the t-90 it feels like it has a lower profile, the A1 is great for aiming... the 98... well atleast its a tank
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7410|Marathon, Florida Keys
the one with the arrow going up, i can range my target better with it.
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
farmerfez
o wut?
+78|7131

I like the T-90 because its gun sounds coolest and it looks the coolest I also think i kill tanks and APC's A LOT easier with it. That's just me
genius_man16
Platinum Star whore
+365|7279|Middle of nowhere
Type 98 FTW!!!  It's sights just work best for me... although i seem to take less damage when i'm in an Abrams.... maybe i'm just hallucinating though....
The1_Knightmare
Alt+F4 For God-Mode
+14|7227
Type 98, though has best sight the turrent is sometimes in the way.

Chinese also has best AA. Chinese FTW (Cause im Chinese too ).
CrazeD
Member
+368|7274|Maine

bigp66 wrote:

Squidward wrote:

I like the M1 as far as sights go.  But in my opinion, it's got the weakest armor.  Have you guys noticed that?  Or is it just me?
it's just you all the tanks and apcs in the game have the same armor....if it were real then teh m1a2 would have the best everything
thanks to the fag who gave me negative karma one this posts you hurt me E feelings and thank you because i like negative karma
IRL the T-90 would pwn the Abrams.
bigp66
Member
+63|7149|memphfrica-memphis,TN

CrazeD wrote:

bigp66 wrote:

Squidward wrote:

I like the M1 as far as sights go.  But in my opinion, it's got the weakest armor.  Have you guys noticed that?  Or is it just me?
it's just you all the tanks and apcs in the game have the same armor....if it were real then teh m1a2 would have the best everything
thanks to the fag who gave me negative karma one this posts you hurt me E feelings and thank you because i like negative karma
IRL the T-90 would pwn the Abrams.
no it wouldn't
shadow18alpha
I attend BF2 Anonymous Meetings
+129|7276|Warlord/Bellevue,WA
the ones found in the USI mod
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7308|67.222.138.85
T-90, anyone notice it's almost exactly identical to the SVD sights?
OpsChief
Member
+101|7277|Southern California
the M1 sight is better for leading aircraft in flight but sucks because tanks are basically M4 Shermans when it comes to targetting. No laser rangefinders no computers no stab!!!
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|7150|Southeastern USA
i've always wondered if the vehicles have weak points like real ones, I tend to aim for the tracks just because that's basic tank SOP, but it doesn't seem to make a difference
OpsChief
Member
+101|7277|Southern California

kr@cker wrote:

i've always wondered if the vehicles have weak points like real ones, I tend to aim for the tracks just because that's basic tank SOP, but it doesn't seem to make a difference
Actual weak points on tanks are much more complicated than BF2. There are no "100% sure kills" unless you are using  something really heavy to hit it. To render a tank non-op you need to breach the turret or hull and incapacitate the crew. In BF2 tracks are the weakest part of the tank but outside the game losing a track rarely stops the tank from firing back and depending on the situation the crew may not bailout immediately upon the loss of a track.

The attack goes as follows. Firing a kinetic round that basically kills with speed and density, the projectile hits the armor near a mile per second. The armor composites begin to dissipate the energy laterally as it smashes through layer upon layer. Not enough layers? Penetration occurs so crew and vital internal componebts are damaged. Next firing Chemical Energy (H.E.A.T. = High Explosive Anti-tank) rounds or AT missiles which uses chemical heat to burn a hole through armor. The HEAT round has a need to focus its jet stream and having spaced layers away from the inner compartments can defeat the HEAT before it ignites ammo or fries people. You often see the armor added to brackets on the outside of APCs and tanks, that is why.

Turret ring (the rotating base section of the turret that connects to hull) a hit can:
-Jam the turret or, KO the tank, cause internal spalling (fragments) to injure/kill crewmen and/or cause secondary explosions. By the way its hard to hit for various reasons.

Grill Doors (Tanks rear)
-Thinest armor on the hull facings causes mobility kill, fire and may force crew bailout

Tracks
-Mobility kill. Hitting tracks from the front rarely KOs a tank because nothing gets inside the fighting compartment. Hitting the tracks from the side thru the skirt armor can be KO but more likely mobility maybe minor repairs to major damage, and crew injury. Hitting just beneath the skirt through the tracks into the hull side armor can KO, crew injury.

Top of tank
-Weaker armor . KO can be more frequent, spalling here too

Bottom of Hull
-Weakest armor of the tank in some parts. KOs often, damage to electrical sysem, controls, crew etc

I probably left something out but there is most of it anyway...

Last edited by OpsChief (2006-06-22 09:21:01)

elmo1337
Banned
+186|7160|The real world
niomosy
Member
+26|7290

k30dxedle wrote:

PLA, gives me a better idea of drop and where the MG will hit.
Yup!  PLA ftw!

I just wish their APC cannon shot a bit faster.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard