fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7009
Taken from: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3228

Without further ado: Intel Core 2 Duo

Intel is set to announce its long awaited Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors tonight, July 13th, at midnight. Initially shown at the Intel Developer Forum 2006, Intel’s Conroe was shown beating out AMD’s fastest processors from high end Athlon 64 X2’s to the gaming and enthusiast oriented Athlon 64 FX. Intel also previously launched the Core 2 architecture based Woodcrest Xeon 5110, 5120, 5130, 5140, 5150 and 5160 models. With the new Core 2 architecture Intel is moving away from the megahertz war and moving towards higher instructions-per-clock performance and improved power efficiency instead. 

New Core 2 processors are based upon a new micro architecture that shares its roots with Intel’s Core mobile architecture. Intel will launch Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme dual-core processors initially, though a single-core Conroe-L Core 2 Solo processor is expected in 2007. Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors have a plethora of new features including Intel Wide Dynamic Execution, Intel Smart Memory Access, Intel Advanced Smart Cache and Intel Advanced Digital Media Boost. Intel’s Wide Dynamic Execution technology allows the 14-stage pipeline to have a 33% wider execution over previous Netburst based processors. Each core also has deeper buffers, 4 wide-decode to execute, 4 wide-micro-op execute, micro and macro fusion and enhanced ALUs too.

Intel Smart Memory Access has an improved branch prediction unit with new pre-fetch algorithms that accelerate execution of out-of-order instructions and improve data movement between the L2 cache and system memory. With Intel Smart Memory Access the pipeline is always kept full for more efficient memory access that can mask the latency associated with a north bridge-equipped memory controller. Intel Advanced Smart Cache allows both processor cores to share the same L2 cache -- though bear in mind this has already been done for some time on Conroe's mobile predecessor, Yonah. Lower-end Core 2 Duo processors will have 2MB of shared L2 while Core 2 Extreme processors and higher end Core 2 Duo processors will have 4MB of share L2 cache. Intel claims a shared L2 cache reduces access latency and improves performance.

Intel Advanced Digital Media Boost is a performance enhancement for previous SSE, SSE2 and SSE3 instructions. While SSE, SSE2 and SSE3 instructions require two clock cycles to execute a single 128-bit instruction on previous architectures, the new Core 2 architecture can execute the same instructions in a single cycle. This improves performance and improves power efficiency as the processor can accomplish the same task in half the time.

Previous features such as Intel Virtualization Technology, Intel Extended Memory 64 Technology and Execute Disable Bit are available on new Core 2 processors as well.

While the performance NDA lifts later tonight availability isn’t expected until July 23rd, 2006.  On July 23rd, 2006 consumers should be able to purchase Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors from most online retailers and stores.  That being said, it's not unlikely that some merchants will start showing stock immediately to pre-empt shipments. Intel will officially announce availability on July 27, 2006.

Intel Desktop Performance Roadmap
Processor
Number
    Frequency     FSB
    L2
Cache     Price
July 23
C2D X6800     2.93GHz     1066MHz
    4MB
    $999
C2D E6700     2.67GHz     1066MHz     4MB     $530
C2D E6600
    2.4GHz     1066MHz     4MB     $316
C2D E6400
    2.13GHz     1066MHz     2MB     $224
C2D E6300
    1.86GHz     1066MHz     2MB     $183
P4D 945
    3.4GHz     800MHz
    2x2MB     $163
P4D 915
    2.8GHz     800MHz     2x2MB     $133
P4D 820
    2.8GHz     800MHz     2x1MB     $113
P4D 805
    2.66GHz     533MHz     2x1MB     $93

Intel has priced Core 2 Duo processors competitively with a traditional Pentium 4 processors on all price points. At the low end of the spectrum are the 2MB L2 cache equipped Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400 priced at $183 and $224 respectively. For an extra few bucks consumers can pickup the Core 2 E6600 with 4MB of L2 cache. Topping off the Core 2 Duo lineup is the E6700 for $530. Core 2 Duo processors will be available with 1.86, 2.13, 2.4 and 2.67 GHz respectively.

Gamers and enthusiasts looking for more performance can pickup the Core 2 Extreme X6800 for $999. Unlike previous Pentium Extreme Edition processors which only added a faster front-side bus and Hyper Threading technology, the Core 2 Extreme is clocked at 2.93 GHz, a 263 MHz clock frequency advantage over the Core 2 Duo E6700. Hyper-Threading will not be available on any initial Core 2 based processors.  Intel will launch a 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme processor later this year, and a quad-core Kentsfield Core 2 Extreme processor early next year.

With the launch of Core 2 Duo Intel will aggressively cut prices on current Pentium D 945, 915, 820 and 805 processors. The 2x2MB of L2 cache equipped 3.4 GHz dual-core Pentium D 945 will drop to $163 while the 2.8 GHz Pentium D 915 will drop to $133. Pentium D 820 and 805 processors will drop to $113 and $93 respectively.

Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme compatible motherboards are expected from Asus, Epox, Gigabyte, Intel and Universal abit with 975X, P965 and G965 chipsets.
fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7009
Some dealers in germany already list the conroe on their website. Unfortunately the price on the website's already increased by app. 10%. I'm looking forward to get one of them, i think late August i'm going to buy the E6600.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7157
dammmit! they tricked us! only extreme comes out first... lol the rest is out on 27th, that sucks for me rofl
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Timelord_
Member
+25|6978
Crap, I was excited for a sec!
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7158|Riva, MD
I hope Newegg start selling them earlier, not that i'll even be able to buy one.  What will the bus speeds and number of pins be on the Conroe?
Timelord_
Member
+25|6978
damn newegg doesnt ship to canuckland....
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7157

_j5689_ wrote:

I hope Newegg start selling them earlier, not that i'll even be able to buy one.  What will the bus speeds and number of pins be on the Conroe?
fsb at 266 and 775 pin
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
kilroy0097
Kilroy Is Here!
+81|7285|Bryan/College Station, TX
Remember it's not the speed that counts with the Conroe Core Duos. It's the higher instructions-per-clock performance and improved power efficiency.  More processes per second and a lower core temp is absolutely a step in the right direction. I'm highly anticipating the first quad core processor (Clovertown) for the mainstream public.

Last edited by kilroy0097 (2006-07-13 18:46:27)

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
AveryHawk
Member
+6|7135|Sacramento,CA

kilroy0097 wrote:

Remember it's not the speed that counts with the Conroe Core Duos. It's the higher instructions-per-clock performance and improved power efficiency.  More processes per second and a lower core temp is absolutely a step in the right direction. I'm highly anticipating the first quad core processor (Clovertown) for the mainstream public.
Clovertown Quadcore is the Xeon family socket 771 you are thinking about the Kentfield series quadcore on the socket 775.
Mr.Clifford
Member
+2|6941|In teh cupboard
Wow, I can't wait to see Intel pwn Amd in the gaming front with its procs. I hate to say it, but if Intel gets better I might make the switch back. Hopefully Amd can pull something out of their sleeves.
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7161|California

Mr.Clifford wrote:

Wow, I can't wait to see Intel pwn Amd in the gaming front with its procs. I hate to say it, but if Intel gets better I might make the switch back. Hopefully Amd can pull something out of their sleeves.
trust me they are scrambling to. Conroe hit them like a bombshell
kilroy0097
Kilroy Is Here!
+81|7285|Bryan/College Station, TX

AveryHawk wrote:

kilroy0097 wrote:

Remember it's not the speed that counts with the Conroe Core Duos. It's the higher instructions-per-clock performance and improved power efficiency.  More processes per second and a lower core temp is absolutely a step in the right direction. I'm highly anticipating the first quad core processor (Clovertown) for the mainstream public.
Clovertown Quadcore is the Xeon family socket 771 you are thinking about the Kentfield series quadcore on the socket 775.
I stand corrected. Thank you sir. 

Also btw another great review that actually shows some good comparisons with top current Pentiums and Athlons. Here:  http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=6184
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
kilroy0097
Kilroy Is Here!
+81|7285|Bryan/College Station, TX

stryyker wrote:

Mr.Clifford wrote:

Wow, I can't wait to see Intel pwn Amd in the gaming front with its procs. I hate to say it, but if Intel gets better I might make the switch back. Hopefully Amd can pull something out of their sleeves.
trust me they are scrambling to. Conroe hit them like a bombshell
Oh yes they are. Now I hope they can release something that is honestly better without screwing it up because of a rush job in answer. Honestly if they come out with something within 6 months I would be very wary of it and I would hold off on getting it until TH or AT or a reputable hardware site really puts it through all the hoops and tests to prove it's on par.

For the first time in a very long time AMD has to prove itself again. This match is going to be awesome for the consumer and should make good CPUs affordable again. At $250, which is $750 cheaper than AMD's top chip ($999), Core 2 Duo is kicking ass.

Edit: An addition. Check out this /. article about AMD's immediate answer.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl … 14/1710236

Last edited by kilroy0097 (2006-07-15 04:46:38)

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
Capt_Flapjack
Member
+12|7196|Kansas City, MO, USA
AMD got whooped on this one.  Intel sweeped the floor with them.  But thats what competition is about.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7157
AMD nearly has no chance... intel said theyre gonna put a new architecture every 2 years.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Snipedya14
Dont tread on me
+77|7136|Mountains of West Virginia

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

AMD nearly has no chance... intel said theyre gonna put a new architecture every 2 years.
Well the Prescott was new architecture right? Nothing good came to intel from that.

New things can fail just as bad.

Last edited by Snipedya14 (2006-07-16 07:36:20)

fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7009

Snipedya14 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

AMD nearly has no chance... intel said theyre gonna put a new architecture every 2 years.
Well the Prescott was new architecture right? Nothing good came to intel from that.
No it wasn't. Prescott cores = Netburst architecture.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7157

fierce wrote:

Snipedya14 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

AMD nearly has no chance... intel said theyre gonna put a new architecture every 2 years.
Well the Prescott was new architecture right? Nothing good came to intel from that.
No it wasn't. Prescott cores = Netburst architecture.
damn straight, intel used netbursts for like what 5 years already?
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Snipedya14
Dont tread on me
+77|7136|Mountains of West Virginia

fierce wrote:

Snipedya14 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

AMD nearly has no chance... intel said theyre gonna put a new architecture every 2 years.
Well the Prescott was new architecture right? Nothing good came to intel from that.
No it wasn't. Prescott cores = Netburst architecture.
Ahh but it still was a new p7 design released in 2000 ish right? So I should of said Willematte sorry. Either was is had a terrible IPC, and was overall IMO a huge step backwards from the non Netburst p6 design.
fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7009
They used the NetBurst architecture for 5 years, the first Pentium 4 has been released in 2001 with the Wilamette core. An Overview about all Intel mikroarchitectures.

https://images.thgweb.de/2006/07/14/intel_core_duo_prozessor/architektur.gif

Last edited by fierce (2006-07-16 10:36:57)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7023|SE London

Wahey no more pipelines with a supid number of stages!

Nice to see Intel back in the picture - and wiping the floor with AMD. The Duo Extreme (or was it the new Xeon, I forget) racking up almost double the FX60s score in many benchmarks.
The question is, if Intel have been capable of producing CPUs like these all this time hasn't the decision to stick with netburst for so long been very very stupid - Intel must think consumers are all idiots who just look for clock speed on their processors.

AMD are fucked now really aren't they, after just realeasing the new AM2 chips (which look a bit shit to me, the DDR2 controller on them doesn't really help much and I've heard many reports of people getting better speeds on their 939 counterparts). So they're commited to sticking with the AM2 chips for a while at least. Intel couldn't have picked a better time to strike back.
Snipedya14
Dont tread on me
+77|7136|Mountains of West Virginia

fierce wrote:

They used the NetBurst architecture for 5 years, the first Pentium 4 has been released in 2001 with the Wilamette core. An Overview about all Intel mikroarchitectures.

http://images.thgweb.de/2006/07/14/inte … tektur.gif
Read my post above...I caught my mistake.

Although Intel did tout the Prescott as a big revampment over the older low clock p4s. But it reall was not up to the hype.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard