| Vehicles exhibiting specific inoperative zone damage | 58% | 58% - 64 | 41% | 41% - 46 | ||
| Vehicles exhibiting less functionality when damage | 62% | 62% - 69 | 37% | 37% - 41 | ||
| Total: 110 | ||||||
Last edited by DoctorFruitloop (2006-07-18 09:17:10)
i was actually responding to your sarcasm which, in a debate, is annoying and helpless. i dont want them to nerf the tank to the point of uslessness, i want them to make it semi-realistic (yes i know its a game, but that doesnt mean SOME physics cant be included).Noop-Ni wrote:
If they're having to dodge, they're not really spawn camping that well, are they? I mean, I'm no expert, but I thought the point was that the tank killed people before they had a chance to do anything.
In any case, though, your idea is pretty stupid. One guy playing AT can basically kill any tank with one shot. I mean, sure, they may not be dead, but they'll be stuck in the middle of nowhere with no way to move. In fact, it's even better than that, 'cause your way the tank won't die, so it won't respawn. So no tank until it explodes by itself, at which point someone will drive one up, get hit once, and the tank will be out of the game again.
Sounds to me like you just can't handle tanks, so you want them nerfed to the point of uselessness, really.
Oh, and that's a great debating style you've got going there, insulting people who disagree with you. I mean, damn, real great.
Last edited by BolvisOculus (2006-07-18 09:42:34)
that's too much of an aimboter's dream. The only people that would benefit from that are those who can and those who aimbot.DoctorFruitloop wrote:
You want it to be real so that Karkand is more playable? How about when you get shot in the head, and you're lying on the floor, you stay there. No defib is gonna put your grey matter back in. Or how about, when you get take a major wound down to two bars, the medic comes up, stick a bandage on it and then shouts "I've put a bandage on it, you'll be out of action for the next three weeks!"
why cant we have a semi realistic game? i see no problem in making it. i see no logic in your last statment and that way of thinking is utter bullshit. though looking at your stats, i see why you dont want your precious tank *gasp* vulnerable to some infantryDoctorFruitloop wrote:
Alright then, lets just simplify it a bit. Let's make the armour a lot more real, and then lets make it way more difficult to spin in the air while you're going prone, and only make it possible to jump when you're actually next to something that needs jumping, not while you're running down the street bounding around like an idiot so that it's unrealistically difficult to get a shot at you. I mean, when was the last time you watched a news story about any conflict and the soldiers were bouncing down the street?
You want the game, then it stays as it is, you want realism, you get it all, not just the bits that suit you.
Last edited by BolvisOculus (2006-07-18 15:15:04)
Last edited by jonsimon (2006-07-18 15:04:58)
No...that is not what he means. Think about it. If it gets hit in the treads then it should be harder to drive and get away. If it gets hit under the turret to much then the turret won't turn as fast. Come on.Noop-Ni wrote:
So a tank that's been shot in the treads will magically reload shells slower? How exactly is that supposed to work?
Lame asses, cant deal with reality. Which was the bases for this game. If u want fake, go fucking play counter strike.stryyker wrote:
Kamikaze17 wrote:
spawnofthemist wrote:
Should Vehicles and Commander assets just be left the hell alone?
Quote for yes.
hell yes, QFT, i want vehichle damage just so it takes SOME skill to vehichle whoredankassasin42o wrote:
Lame asses, cant deal with reality. Which was the bases for this game. If u want fake, go fucking play counter strike.stryyker wrote:
Kamikaze17 wrote:
I say fuck up the vehicals just to piss off these lame asses ^^
Too late. As soon as quake wars is out, fuck bf2.d4rkph03n1x wrote:
No. Bad idea, look what they did to the blackhawk? If they underpower vehicles further, the game will lose player base to quake wars.
Last edited by Defiance (2006-07-18 16:26:35)
That's what he said.PFCStenzel wrote:
No...that is not what he means.Noop-Ni wrote:
So a tank that's been shot in the treads will magically reload shells slower? How exactly is that supposed to work?
It's not actually. Using sarcasm lets me illustrate just how foolish your idea was, so people can easily realise it. Calling me a smacktard serves no purpose other than to insult me.BolvisOculus wrote:
i was actually responding to your sarcasm which, in a debate, is annoying and helpless.
It's not, really. If you can come at it from the side, it's pretty simple. I mean, the tank isn't super maneuverable or anything. If you're playing Karkand, by the time you hear the missile tone it's far far to late to dodge.it usually is difficult to hit a tank in its tracks, IF the tank driver knows how to use it.
Because the people who are new to the game don't deserve to have fun, right?this would stop any lower ranked (you perhaps call them noob) from getting in, which solves a completly different problem if you are a tank whore.
Tanks can be killed easily enough as they are. The only time they get broken is when you've got an engineer convoy with their magic repair aura, and your idea won't fix that.And it would also make it take some SKILL to sucessfully leave the round 40 and 0 by spawn raping the hotel on karkand because you could much eaiser be brought down. (i use karkand because it is what most people thinhk of with tanks)
whats the difference between that and now, it takes (usally) 3 tank shots to kill a tank, whoever gets the threee of first wins, and if you get the first one off first, they cant catch up unless you happen to missBabySpinach13 wrote:
In the case of a tank battle.. Who ever shot first would win.
QFYstryyker wrote:
Kamikaze17 wrote:
spawnofthemist wrote:
Should Vehicles and Commander assets just be left the hell alone?
Quote for yes.
Last edited by Disodium (2006-07-18 20:25:15)
stryyker wrote:
Kamikaze17 wrote:
spawnofthemist wrote:
Should Vehicles and Commander assets just be left the hell alone?
Quote for yes.
If it becomes the automatic tank breaking point, then I daresay a few more people will start aiming there.BolvisOculus wrote:
also, i would say that 70% of shots hit on a tank are not on the tracks, it is not as easy as you make it sound.
In that case, one shot and he can't move at all. Someone may end up using the tank as a sort of static gun turret, but it's functionally crippled.usually the tank is facing horizontally to the cover, ill use the warehouse as an example, the tank is going to be facing toward the gatehouse and north of the factory giving you a shot at his side.
Well, the splash damage will certainly work, but he'd have to have some damn good reflexes to hit you if you stand, fire, and then prone immediately after. Like, inhumanly good.even with cover, it would be very hard to get 3 shots off. after the first shot, he knows where you are, and as soon as you pop up (or he may shoot the floor or behind to kill you with splash damage) he is going to put a tank shell/bullet in your face.
Slick.APC's & Mobile AA
When they are 50% damaged the fire rate should slow down to 1/3 the speed. Once damaged at 75% or more 1/2 its speed.
Last edited by haffeysucks (2006-07-18 21:46:34)