BFROE|IndianScout
Member
+41|6959

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

Oh well. It's a game. What satisfaction do you get in playing the role of Officer Battlefield? Just play the game instead of worrying about other people's stats and awards.
the satisfaction I get is a level playing field for ALL players no matter their skill level and a ranking system that player gain rank and award that they actually earn...

btw the chink spic comment in your ROE would only get you sued..


as you see it's a little harder to write an ROE than complain about it...

I do however applaud your attempt tho..

Indian
=Robin-Hood=
A stranger in the dark
+213|7267|Belgium

In great appreciation of the task at hand... I'll be cleaning the spam.
Be constructive or don't respond;

R
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7077|Washington, DC

No stat padding rules will be difficult. As you are aware, it's a cause for problems in the community. Accusations everywhere of padding, people caring more about other's stats. Indeed, this is mostly from the player itself, but if there is no punishment for having stats, then there would be less "OMFG PADDER" and more "omg i hate ur high scores bitch".

Another thing that would be REQUIRED if there were to be rules regarding padding would be that EACS needs to be WAY more cooperative in reset appeals. Having seen mele and Ins4n3's email exchanges with EA, it's disgusting. EA needs to:

1) Provide evidence if possible

2) Provide the real reason for the reset so the player knows not to do it again

Third, resets should be done depending on the severity. If they padded a few hundred points, reset those points. If they padded for some awards, reset those awards. If they continue the behavior, THEN reset the entire stats of the player. It may be more time consuming for EA but it would be much better and less Draconian than the current system.

EDIT: The 'chink spic' wouldn't be in the real ROE, i just put it there as an example of why that thing in the ROE would be far better than 'no infantry only'

Last edited by ExecutionerStyle (2006-07-20 14:15:06)

timeinfinite
gõt ðæmôñ?
+14|7172
I will pass this on to my clan, we will reply soon .. ....
JaM3z
Banned
+311|7157
Here would be my ROE, who on these forums agree's with this:


§1.1 You may not arrange for the exchange or transfer of any pirated software or other contraband while you are on any Ranked Servers.

    * § This would include the copy and distribution of copyrighted software or cd-keys

Well that rule is pretty damn obvious

§1.2 You may not change (hack) any core games files, load into memory or employ external programs or cheats for the purposes of giving yourself an unfair advantage over other players.

This would include but not limited to:

    * § MSX and other 3rd party software.
    * § Modification of weapons code, aka Tank turrets exploit.
    * § CVAR hacks which would make players appear Neon
    * § CVAR hacks that let players see thru walls or buildings
    * § Mini-Map hack so all players are visible
    * § Modification of Player Names which would alter their size or colors.
    * § Items not included in this list would be up to EA & DICE to interpret.

Well this is another obvious rule.

§1.3 Server administrators may not change any game settings defined as standard for ranked servers (ticket ratios, server password, round time, etc.)

This is pretty obvious already as server admins (like me) do not get FTP access to change this stuff.

§1.4 Server administrators may not enforce restrictions on roles or kits that players can use while on your server.

This would include but not limited to:

    * § Spec Ops
    * § Squad Leader
    * § Note.. Commander class can not be enforced

Pretty obvious again.....

§1.5 Players may not use or exploit game mechanisms to artificially boost their score ("stats padding") and Server administrators may not knowingly allow or encourage this activity on their servers.

This would include but not limited to:

    * § Knife-Pistol-Revive
    * § Knife-Pistol only Servers
    * § Knife only Servers
    * § High Points Servers
    * § Turning boats upside down and repairing
    * § Glitching inside buildings.
    * § Modifying game files for vehicles and weapons.

These are the only ones that need to be classed as stats padding.

This my friends is a simple ROE and if you break it down it goes like this.

No statspadding
No knife pistol servers
No high points servers
No hacking
No glitching buildings

5 simple rules.......................
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|7100
in my opinion, the anti-ROE craze going on at bf2s has been started by a few (populair) members *cough*TOP*cough* and now the entire forum is against it. although I don't entirely agree with the ROE i think that was it is supposed to do, keep stats-enabled servers fair, has been achieved.
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
Home
Section.80
+447|7294|Seattle, Washington, USA

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

No stat padding rules will be difficult. As you are aware, it's a cause for problems in the community. Accusations everywhere of padding, people caring more about other's stats. Indeed, this is mostly from the player itself, but if there is no punishment for having stats, then there would be less "OMFG PADDER" and more "omg i hate ur high scores bitch".

Another thing that would be REQUIRED if there were to be rules regarding padding would be that EACS needs to be WAY more cooperative in reset appeals. Having seen mele and Ins4n3's email exchanges with EA, it's disgusting. EA needs to:

1) Provide evidence if possible

2) Provide the real reason for the reset so the player knows not to do it again

Third, resets should be done depending on the severity. If they padded a few hundred points, reset those points. If they padded for some awards, reset those awards. If they continue the behavior, THEN reset the entire stats of the player. It may be more time consuming for EA but it would be much better and less Draconian than the current system.

EDIT: The 'chink spic' wouldn't be in the real ROE, i just put it there as an example of why that thing in the ROE would be far better than 'no infantry only'
Agreed, it will be difficult, and you ideas on resseting are great, and the community would be WAY more pleased with EA, but considering their performance so far, I doubt it will happen.
BFROE|IndianScout
Member
+41|6959

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

No stat padding rules will be difficult. As you are aware, it's a cause for problems in the community. Accusations everywhere of padding, people caring more about other's stats. Indeed, this is mostly from the player itself, but if there is no punishment for having stats, then there would be less "OMFG PADDER" and more "omg i hate ur high scores bitch".

Another thing that would be REQUIRED if there were to be rules regarding padding would be that EACS needs to be WAY more cooperative in reset appeals. Having seen mele and Ins4n3's email exchanges with EA, it's disgusting. EA needs to:

1) Provide evidence if possible

2) Provide the real reason for the reset so the player knows not to do it again

Third, resets should be done depending on the severity. If they padded a few hundred points, reset those points. If they padded for some awards, reset those awards. If they continue the behavior, THEN reset the entire stats of the player. It may be more time consuming for EA but it would be much better and less Draconian than the current system.

EDIT: The 'chink spic' wouldn't be in the real ROE, i just put it there as an example of why that thing in the ROE would be far better than 'no infantry only'
as you see the BF2RS/BFROE programs were started from scratch, and had to deal with the many different aspects of BF2 and the community at large,

the reason I started this thread was to give a little insight on just how hard our job is, not only do we have to keep the community happy dealing with not only the exploiters and cheaters but the padders and EA as a whole..

so if you think it's hard to try and write an ROE, then the next logical step is to define and code a reporting system that ensures that innocent players do not fall thru the cracks and get reset by accident,  we are only human and a few mistakes have been made, but as a whole I believe we do a great job..  both programs..

so you guys have just touched the tip of the iceburg..  keep going...

Indian
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7077|Washington, DC

I'm assuming that BFROE will continue its work with 2142 as there's already an option for player and server reports to say they're a 2142 player/server. Even if a new ROE comes into effect near the end of BF2, it can still be beneficial to 2142.
BFROE|IndianScout
Member
+41|6959
yes we will, along with alot of other new games that are coming out..
jord
Member
+2,382|7125|The North, beyond the wall.

JaM3z wrote:

§1.1 You may not arrange for the exchange or transfer of any pirated software or other contraband while you are on any Ranked Servers.
Why?
PFCStenzel
Check your AA alarm...
+82|7241|Idaho, USA / Age 30
In real life the enemy doesn't have rules.  So, why do these server like to make them.   Stupid servers with no uncappable base raping allowed.   I was following a guy in a jet and just as he got into his airspace I fired my missiles and killed him and they said I wasn't following the rules.   How gay is that.  I say none of this stay out of enemy airspace.  The enemy doesn't follow rules like that.
De_Jappe
Triarii
+432|6974|Belgium

With all respect to indian, I have nothing against you but as we learn at the uni here:

"Don't write crappy code and then write in a manual what is not allowed, but write the code that way that exploits cannot happen."

The problem lies not in the roe, of course you need to punish cheaters. And I agree on some rules like: that many players needed before starting a (ranked) game, no mods on ranked, BUT why is this a rule, this can be forced by coding, like: an admin cannot change minimum players to start game. If this is the case now, I don't think it belongs in the ROE as you cannot change it. Either way something is wrong with these rules.
The problem is that people can glitch into buildings, this shouldn't be possible. If people cannot use exploits, there is no need to put those silly rules in a manual. So basicly, fix this by writing decent coding and decent testing. If an exploit shows up, fix it.

The next problem: Wrong solutions, example: resetting stats from people who play on KP servers, 80% of those don't know it's not allowed as they didn't read the ROE. If you unrank the KP servers, people can't play on ranked KP servers anymore and the problem is gone. Take the problems out at the source.

And could somone please change the background of the main page of www.bf2roe.com as 50% is hardly readable, must have been the worst choice of background in history except for that pain-in-the-eyes-yellow one I once saw.

Besides from that I have nothing against the ROE, you need rules to make it playable for everyone, I just think it could use some tweaking (basicly the code and how to 'punish') If those problems are solved, much of the roe would be useless and then it could focus on some basic rules. Good luck, and this are of course only my 2 cents.
BFROE|IndianScout
Member
+41|6959
while I agree with you,

here is the challenge tho,  you have to deal with the code and players that are handed to you..

it's not our job to rewrite the game, but to enforce what is handed to us...

so as you see this gets harder

Last edited by BFROE|IndianScout (2006-07-20 14:28:50)

xstax981
Community Modder
+93|7123
Don't pad (Stab & Revive, KP servers are ok)
Don't glitch/hack
Don't TK
Go crazy

Last edited by xstax981 (2006-07-20 14:31:34)

Sgt.Davi
Touches Himself At Night.
+300|7090|England
All I can say is how can you claim that you are shutting down against ROE servers when searching the word knife in the search....thing you get a list of around 40 strong.....
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7077|Washington, DC

Just a few more cents:

In regards to my idea for handling resets, some other things could be done too. The player could be reset and if they appeal and the cause for reset was not too grave and they are restored, they could be placed under watch. If they are reset again they will not be able to get back their stats if there was sufficient evidence and a valid reason.

I realize that my ideas for handling resets take more manpower than what's there now, and more manpower=more cost. But I know a lot of people have many reasons for not getting 2142, one of them being that they don't want a game that has a police force running it. A more forgiving and player-focused stats handling system would possibly turn a new leaf for EA, bring back old customers, and secure customers. It may cost more but in the end would even out as more people would be pleased that EA would actually handle the cases rather than reset, send an e-mail, then reject any possibility of a appeal or restoration.

PS: Indian check your PM's
spawnofthemist
Banned
+1,128|7088|Burmecia, Land of the Rain

usmarine2005 wrote:

Gee, when I say that it gets deleted.
i'm sure it'll go soon enough..

but seriously.. if there were no ROE.. there would be no "OMFG WIPED!!LOLZ!" or I CAUGHT A STAZPADDR!! CUM SEE!!"

and people would be able to have fun once more.. my theory.. if you dont like what someones doing on a server.. then dont go on that server..

if someone statpads you? who cares? its their way of fun.. just like playing the game YOUR way is YOUR way of having fun..

fair enough glitching should be enforced.. but theres only two real invincible spots in the whole of vanilla bf2.. and they were introduced with the "revolutionary car drop" feature.. which has caused more trouble than benefit to the community as far as the amounts of complaints go..


i'm up for debating this as long as we get change that benefits people other than those who cant help getting owned by someone "baseraping"


p.s. who the fuck made that term up? its one of the lamest things i've ever heard..
DecJW
Webhoster
+38|7031
Infantry only is allowed. The rules set on a server which is paid for by admins - should be able to run it how they want
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7208

DecJW wrote:

Infantry only is allowed. The rules set on a server which is paid for by admins - should be able to run it how they want
Very true.  Servers are expensive, so leave it up to the people who paid for it.  Unless you paid for it, who are you to tell them how to run it?

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-07-20 14:40:16)

M1-Lightning
Jeepers Creepers
+136|7178|Peoria, Illinois
There should be concrete stupid-friendly ROE. Create seperate ROEs for players for server admins. There should be a clearly defined ROE list for players the if broken, will get their stats wiped. This should make it clear to the players out there that not every rule applies to them and which ones do. Too many people complain about parts of the ROE that at most will only get them kicked from a server because they only apply to clan server admins if they wish to apply them to their server.
Todd_Angelo
Leukocyte
+336|7074|Warlord

BFROE|IndianScout wrote:

guys PWING the TK NOOB doesnt make an ROE
Hear hear. Given all the stick you get personally and the ROE gets, actually having the opportunity to provide some input shouldn't be wasted on juvenile one-liners.

BFROE|IndianScout wrote:

it has to be written so that the 2 million people who purchased BF2 can understand and abide by it,  there are more rules and such that have to be followed...
I'm actually for rules since we sign an agreement that we agree to abide by when we join up but "there are more rules and such that have to be followed" is only true if there are actually more rules. If you don't start with the prior assumption of the many rules we have now but from a clean slate it might be better.

BFROE|IndianScout wrote:

Admins who make their own ROE and dont abide by the official one will get delisted or shut down, that is already stated in the new ROE...
Like when? Is this like the 'rules' on eBay which, for all practical purposes, apply to the sellers and not the buyers?

In all seriousness pick a day and I could find you a half-dozen servers I bet that have at least one rule that's against the letter of the ROE, and maybe a couple more with rules that are against the spirit of them (assuming I've understood them correctly, some are a little vaguely worded). I can give you three of four examples right here if you want them.

Okay, on the suggestions.

FWIW I think that having something coded is the best idea going... if EA don't want X or Y to be done simply make it physically impossible. With the exception of cheating obviously, in every FPS I've ever played if you can do it it's fair game and that's the way it should be.

Example: they changed the way vehicles work so that only the driver counted for the flag-capturing speed (so you had to bail out to capture at the speed of a whole squad). Personally I think that was a good thing for a couple of reasons, but anyway, then we get a rule about not being allowed to heal, resupply or repair from within a transport helicopter... okay, then why not code it?! Then, instead of a system where you have the potential temptation to 'cheat' you simply can't do it, end of story.

Failing hardcoding it I think ExecutionerStyle's rules (post #12) are a good start from what I can think of now. That last one:
4) Servers must clearly show server rules.
Emphasis on the must. That way if you don't like their rules (no baserape for example) you can cancel the loading and find another server that's more to your liking. BF2 is slow enough to start, log in to and load each server/map without having to waste additional time because you're finally in but then realise that some rule or setting isn't to your liking.
SteikeTa
Member
+153|7194|Norway/Norwegen/ Norge/Noruega
A rule: everyone can be attacked now matter where they are on the map. No "safe areas" as someone wrote earlier
Ben>You
Member
+90|6973
ROE:
1 GLOBALLY ENFORCED SERVER RULES

§1.1 A player may market or advertise anything they wish unless specifically told by an admin not to do so.

§1.2 Server admins can customize standard Ranked game settings, such as round time, tickets, ect, but cannot password a Ranked server.

§1.3 Server admins can choose to enforce what vehicles and weapons are used in-game. This includes but is not limited to:
     §Knife-Pistol Server
     §Infantry-Only servers
     §Limiting the types of vehicles used in-game

§1.4 Server admins can enforce what kits are used so long as they are enforced fairly.

§1.5 Server administrators may not use non-standard (custom map packs) maps or modified versions of standard maps.

§1.6 Players can feel free to harass or impersonate BF2RS admins, but by doing so acknowledge that they will be perma banned or wiped if caught.

§1.7 TK Punish can be set to off, and is the default option in Ranked servers.

2 EA OFFICIAL PUBLIC SERVER RULES

§2.1 You may not use any rascist language in the All, or Team chat.

3 LOCAL (PRIVATELY RENTED) RANKED SERVER RULES MODIFICATIONS

§3.1 Rules that a private Server administrator may think he has the ability to enforce, but does not include, but are not limited to:

§ Artillery fire or bombing runs on main (uncapturable) bases.
§ Prolonged or sustained attacks on main (uncapturable) bases (i.e. spawncamping).
§ Using the Transport Helicopters to take flags (Blackhawk whoring or flag hopping).
§ Using C4 on jeeps, or other fast moving vehicles to take out other vehicles.

However, Clans may customize and enforce the rules providing they don't break the above ROE (eg. impersonating clan members ect.)

EDIT: Oh, and dont hack, sorry left that out

Last edited by Ben>You (2006-07-20 14:53:04)

BFROE|IndianScout
Member
+41|6959
I have probably 1500+ hours in admin and private servers, stats to me dont mean alot since I spend all day enforcing them,  we test glitches/exploits and more in our private servers ...

I cant enforce rules if I dont know how they are addressed in servers now can I??

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard