If accuracy is so important why does this not reflect on your k/d ratio's Nyte? For example, you have an accuracy of 57.33% with sniper rifles, but only a k/d of 1.18. Could it be that tactics also play the major role?
Most people could equal your accuracy on all weapons (if they tried or even cared) but that would mean they would take more time over each shot (and would not try those near impossible shots) which in turn would reduce their k/d and their kills per round - my point being accuracy and k/d are somewhat linked.
If your trying to find out who is the best player you cant compare on accuracy or even k/d. In fact I dont believe It can even be done. So much rests on the quality of other players in your team, among other things.
Is the best medic one who kills 20 per round with a k/d over 3 with accuracy in the 30's but yet never revive's nor heal's his teammates? Or is the best medic one who goes out of his way to revive and heal his teammates despite this impacting negatively on his k/d stats?
The "best" players are those who work as a TEAM, and unfortunately in this area BF2 is sorely lacking.
P.S. How do I know you didnt get that high accuracy from spawn camping 2 inches away from the enemy on karkand?
see my point?
Last edited by KimSnow (2005-11-21 14:18:47)