Can BF2 get any buggier?

2006-07-24 10:51:33

#1

killaer: Member; +41|7284

I've played Battlefield 2 since the very first day the demo came out. I played that somewhere until...what october? Right through last summer...
It was great. Never ran into a problem. VERY rarely a crash. Worked GREAT on my decent computer without a Nvidia 7950 XTZOMGROFLOMFG video card.

Now?
Crashes.
Bugs.
Glitches.

What happened? Why? WHY DOES THIS GAME FUCKING BUG SO MUCH!?

Does EA even CARE? We don't NEED patches making guns less accurate or making dolphin diving less of a problem, CURE THE FUCKING BUGS!

2006-07-24 10:52:29

#2

diglow~Flow: Member; +32|7193|British Columbia, Canada

lol cuz EA patched it...................

2006-07-24 11:00:46

#3

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|7257|Devon, England

dice patched it...

2006-07-24 11:02:51

#4

Fancy_Pollux: Connoisseur of Fine Wine; +1,306|7213

Lern 2 update drivers
Lern 2 scan 4 spyware
Lern 2 scan 4 viruses
Lern 2 not have 50 processes running in the background

2006-07-24 11:05:26

#5

killaer: Member; +41|7284

I spyware and Virus scanned yesterday

Drivers are updated fine

lrn2uselrn2

2006-07-24 11:28:22

#6

Fancy_Pollux: Connoisseur of Fine Wine; +1,306|7213

lern 2 karma

2006-07-24 11:31:24

#7

VeNg3nCe^: ¦Tactics Øver Principles¦; +314|7272|Antarctica

Welcome to 1.3.

2006-07-24 11:42:49

#8

Watermeleon: Member; +34|7100|I am located at my location

killaer wrote:
Can BF2 get any buggier?

Yes, it is possible. If you want to see BF2 buggier, tamper around with your global script. Glad I could help.

2006-07-24 12:10:02

#9

killaer: Member; +41|7284

I've been told by a friend on xfire that 1.3 brought up alot of lag and crahses...did it really?

2006-07-24 12:13:36

#10

Buckles: Cheeky Keen; +329|7123|Kent, UK

Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Lern 2 update drivers
Lern 2 scan 4 spyware
Lern 2 scan 4 viruses
Lern 2 not have 50 processes running in the background

Learn to spell??
Also about the process, they don't matter to an extent cuz even if you switch a lot of them off, windows ALWAYS allocates 100% of memory to sommat, if you have a look, the System Idle Process is windows doing other bits, so closing off other processes just frees up more memory for windows to run its shit in the background = no extra memory for BF2

2006-07-24 12:18:17

#11

Ryker: Member; +13|7071

Stop whinging. Thats all anyone does now. If you dont like the bugs get a new game and get lost. Try UT.

2006-07-24 12:21:21

#12

[BBF]Snake: The lord high master of pies; +16|7204|England

^KoB^Buckles wrote:
Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Lern 2 update drivers
Lern 2 scan 4 spyware
Lern 2 scan 4 viruses
Lern 2 not have 50 processes running in the background
Learn to spell??

Damn someone got that remark in before me *sigh* I just deal with the bugs and move on. If I CTD, I just rejoin a server. Simple really

2006-07-24 12:46:02

#13

Vic: Whore; +7|7054|Omaha Beach

Patches..

2006-07-24 12:57:43

#14

Fancy_Pollux: Connoisseur of Fine Wine; +1,306|7213

There is absolutely no case to be made for that stance whatsoever. Your parallels are tenuously drawn at best and your reasoning is, to put it mildly, specious. I challenge you to back up you ‘statistics’ with peer-reviewed studies and furthermore I demand to see the conclusions drawn by the original undertakers of the study, rather than your heavy polarized stance. In addition to this I do not think your assertion stands up to scrutiny on a purely logical basis – not only do you contradict yourself but also commonly accepted practices on rational methodology.

2006-07-24 13:06:37

#15

Roger Lesboules: Ah ben tabarnak!; +316|7144|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

As an answer to the original question.

Can BF2 get any buggier. Knowing how EA/DICE are working and thinking....we just scratched the top of that big motherfcking iceberg buddy....i know they got alot of surprise for us comming in the 1.4.

EA/DICE are loser wich shall not build any game.

2006-07-24 14:18:32

#16

killaer: Member; +41|7284

Fancy_Pollux wrote:
There is absolutely no case to be made for that stance whatsoever. Your parallels are tenuously drawn at best and your reasoning is, to put it mildly, specious. I challenge you to back up you ‘statistics’ with peer-reviewed studies and furthermore I demand to see the conclusions drawn by the original undertakers of the study, rather than your heavy polarized stance. In addition to this I do not think your assertion stands up to scrutiny on a purely logical basis – not only do you contradict yourself but also commonly accepted practices on rational methodology.

Nice, what site did you get that from?

2006-07-24 14:22:08

#17

Possum61: Member; +9|7315|Philly PA USA

Never say never

2006-07-25 06:35:31

#18

Barney_T_Dinosaur: Time to Die Kids!; +41|7226

can BF2 get any buggier? Yes, now lets not tempt them to, we dont want EA and DICE to think this is a challenge.

2006-07-25 06:57:48

#19

pfc_toecutter: meatshield; +38|7185|Houston, TX

killaer wrote:
Fancy_Pollux wrote:
There is absolutely no case to be made for that stance whatsoever. Your parallels are tenuously drawn at best and your reasoning is, to put it mildly, specious. I challenge you to back up you ‘statistics’ with peer-reviewed studies and furthermore I demand to see the conclusions drawn by the original undertakers of the study, rather than your heavy polarized stance. In addition to this I do not think your assertion stands up to scrutiny on a purely logical basis – not only do you contradict yourself but also commonly accepted practices on rational methodology.
Nice, what site did you get that from?

Pollux's brain is it's own internet.

2006-07-25 06:59:15