Paldains & Stealth

2006-07-28 15:38:11

#1

USRangerJohnson: Member; +2|7052

Other then the snow maps (which im still wanting badly) something else that would be cool is the Self Propelled artillery. Instead of being for commanders only then artillery would be avaible to all. And to make it accurate you get the mini map in the corner only it shows you your postion and your targets postion(not enemy people just where your shell will land). Then when you call for arty support (spotting a enemy and giving the gunner a postion to shoot) you will actually get it.
Also they should make stealth fighters. Although im not sure if any other nations have stelath fighters im sure there are some really good ones out there. However it cant be the F-22 Raptor because that thing would own everything.

2006-07-28 15:43:26

#2

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|7134|NYC / Hamburg

we've been through this. self propelled arty would be cool but won't happen. and stealth fighters would make no difference as there is no proper radar in bf2.

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2006-07-28 15:54:59

#3

eagles1106: Member; +269|7150|Marlton, New Jersey.

and i would love the introduction of long range high altitude bombers, like the b1 or b2 for examples. comanders could call for an airstrike on any given area by selecting from a list of payloads the bomber is carrying(ranging from guided bombs to cluster bombs and more), after that that commander would wait for a meter to recharge just like artillery.

and there are top of line fighters that would compete with the f-22 if needed
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … amp;q=su37
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … amp;q=su47

2006-07-29 13:52:07

#4

souljar: Member; +8|7051|Liverpool U.K

Could be good idea , why not throw some tomahawks in for the ships too .

2006-07-29 13:55:16

#5

kuntpunch_37: Banned; +7|7060|Little Rock, Arkansas bitches

eagles1106 wrote:
and i would love the introduction of long range high altitude bombers, like the b1 or b2 for examples. comanders could call for an airstrike on any given area by selecting from a list of payloads the bomber is carrying(ranging from guided bombs to cluster bombs and more), after that that commander would wait for a meter to recharge just like artillery.

i think bombers would be bad ass, and it would be cool if the fighters could blow them out of the sky, so that pilots would have to worry about defending their bombers and attacking other bombers as well. i think escorting bombers would make a really cool addition to piloting in bf2. not that i think it will happen, but it would definitely be cool.

2006-07-29 18:51:13

#6

seymorebutts443: Ready for combat; +211|7161|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA

i would love to see the Berkut in the game.

2006-07-29 22:46:18

#7

PAS Bknife: Member; +2|7052|NJ

yea like EA would really add those to the game.

2006-07-31 04:44:05

#8

david363: Crotch fires and you: the untold story; +314|7305|Comber, Northern Ireland

i think they should have put the F-22 into the game instead of the F-35

2006-08-01 14:42:53

#9

USAFDude_1988: Will fly for food.; +120|7075|Daytona Beach, FL

david363 wrote:
i think they should have put the F-22 into the game instead of the F-35

F-22s aren't carrier based.. let alone capable of vertical takeoff from an amphibious assault ship.

They put the F-35 into the game because the only other realistic option was the AV8B Harrier... which is way below the performance charateristics of a MiG-29, let alone a J-10.

Last edited by USAFDude_1988 (2006-08-01 15:07:32)

BF2S Forums Paldains & Stealth

eagles1106 wrote:

david363 wrote:

Board footer