^^^^^THIS IS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
I mean Infantry only should not be ranked, because it is much easier to get points for those who don't have to fear jets and tanks.
Poll
Should Infantry Only By Ranked?
| No | 31% | 31% - 129 | ||||
| Yes | 68% | 68% - 284 | ||||
| Total: 413 | ||||||
127 hours in a plane racking up easy kills and all your worried about is people not playing on wake island or any other map with planes anymore .
whats the point of this poll anyway? BFROE will still be the boss
I fear no armour or air vechile m8 ,i like testing myself agaisnt other poeple with guns and i like the teamwork aspect of the game also .Samtheman53 wrote:
^^^^^THIS IS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
I mean Infantry only should not be ranked, because it is much easier to get points for those who don't have to fear jets and tanks.
HELL NO!!!!!! if you search for infantry only, search without ranked filter on.Dr_3V|L wrote:
Yes it should be ranked, because otherwise much less people would be playing it.
i dont want anymore newbs wasting my time in infantry servers, i want to get pwned when on it (like on enelux server most of the times), for training.
the 1.4 infantry only wont be used by the real infantry users, i recomment you wont eighter. its not the meaning of inf only that you can think while beeing shot at without taking cover. its meaning to think WHILE shooting, in a 1-5 sec period, not having 20 seconds, beeing asleep, a nade explodes next to you, you go " get first aid here" and sleep further.
1.4 inf only is NOOBISH. its for NOOBS, real infantry only FTW!
Knight I hate you
Your Infantry Stats: "Averages 08:29:27 105 142 0.74 21.49%"Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
And you just lost the arguement young sir with a stupid childish remark .If your not willing to listen to other peoples views around here the best thing to do id dont make a poll/post about a stupid topic that has been discussed better and more maturely in other threads here .Samtheman53 wrote:
Knight I hate you
What? Are you completly retarded are just a little bit?Vilham wrote:
Also that is a crap score on 64 player server. So they arent that fair.
Its harder to get points on 64 man server than it is on <64
Your the one coming out with stupid comments: "wawa wa hes in a tank all the time"Knight`UK wrote:
And you just lost the arguement young sir with a stupid childish remark .If your not willing to listen to other peoples views around here the best thing to do id dont make a poll/post about a stupid topic that has been discussed better and more maturely in other threads here .Samtheman53 wrote:
Knight I hate you
Indeed the level of play is much higher on unranked servers, due to the reason that most clan players don't like ranked pubbing and therefore play unranked.a fly wrote:
HELL NO!!!!!! if you search for infantry only, search without ranked filter on.
i dont want anymore newbs wasting my time in infantry servers, i want to get pwned when on it (like on enelux server most of the times), for training.
[...]
1.4 inf only is NOOBISH. its for NOOBS, real infantry only FTW!
But i must remind you about something "a fly" - DICE changed the infantry only settings to usual BF2. Therefore you only got twice as much sprint energy nothing else (hitpoints/damage).
Last edited by fierce (2006-08-15 04:43:51)
I forgot you cant read i said ARMOUR/JET you fucking dumb fucking shitneeb piece of fucking shit learn to read before flameing you fucking numpty .Samtheman53 wrote:
Your the one coming out with stupid comments: "wawa wa hes in a tank all the time"Knight`UK wrote:
And you just lost the arguement young sir with a stupid childish remark .If your not willing to listen to other peoples views around here the best thing to do id dont make a poll/post about a stupid topic that has been discussed better and more maturely in other threads here .Samtheman53 wrote:
Knight I hate you
You are so so thick my last post here because its obivous you only read what you want to read and dont want to listen to others views .I suggest you fuck off over to totalbattlefield and post there because they might be able to put up with monkey fuckers like you .
or what we could do is jump around the spawn point untill the tank driver dies and get the tank, or we could tk each other for the plane... YEAH COZ THATS REALY FUCKING GOOD ISNT IT!Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
I mean Infantry only should not be ranked, because it is much easier to get points for those who don't have to fear jets and tanks.
L2P mate, infantry requires a hell of a lot more skill than vechicles.
Well said m8Vilham wrote:
or what we could do is jump around the spawn point untill the tank driver dies and get the tank, or we could tk each other for the plane... YEAH COZ THATS REALY FUCKING GOOD ISNT IT!Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
I mean Infantry only should not be ranked, because it is much easier to get points for those who don't have to fear jets and tanks.
L2P mate, infantry requires a hell of a lot more skill than vechicles.
If there were more tanks and planes like there are in realy life i would enjoy normal mode however the simple fact is that there arent which means 1 or 2 ppl are kill proof, meanwhile everyone else has to try and get on with playing normally, either choosing a kit that is shit at killing infantry just so they can kill the very few tanks/APCs or going good against infantry kits which are fucked when tank/APCs come along.
Some of us want a diffrent game play style then annoying armor whores with an advantage. Sure doesnt take a whole lot of skill to kill a ground troop when you are in a tank. Granted it's a fun, and usefull part of the game, but not everyone wants to play armor whore. Most who pick up the argument of how it shouldnt be included in the patch, or shouldn't be ranked, are normally the ones who like to sit in the alleyways of hotel and spawn rape. Here's your cluepon, dont play it if you dont like it.Samtheman53 wrote:
No its crap your all scared of tanks aand apcsRDMC(2) wrote:
No! No! No! No! No!!Samtheman53 wrote:
In my opinion it should be unranked as they are at a huge advantage of not having apcs nail them as soon as they spawn, jets rape the carrier, helos rape what ever they can find etc.
It may of been covered before but I don't care.
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
No! No! No! No! No!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Get it?
The people that are against infantry only do not seem to realize that the ranking system already allows for peoples stats to be catered by the individual choices of the player. For example medics gain many more teamwork points on average than assault. But then assault players may get more kills than medics. Pilots that never play maps like mashtuur and karkand get insane kill to death ratios. Engineer in a tank versus on foot could drasticaly change your engie k:d and overall k:d. People typically still find the ranking useful with all this divergent playing because the same system records how much of a, for example, medic whore, armor whore, commander whore etc. you are. People that play infantry only will have strengthend infantry stats, provided that they are good as infantry. This wont destroy the ranking system at all. It just means in the future when you look at someones stats, you HOPEFULLY will be able to to see how much of that was infantry only. As far as I'm concerned, the choices we have between maps and vehicles already affect our stats more than infantry only will.
what a noob proud of spawn killing no wonder your afraid of infantry onlySamtheman53 wrote:
Yes and proud!-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
So i'm guessing your one of the people who rape the carrier in a J10...
BUT! The people who Im raping are at unfair advantage as there are people who play on infantry only!!
I love infantry only, I cant wait...but it will make the scores greatly increase on those servers.
Good. Then they can lower the General time requirements since people have the points earlier. I've been sitting here off and on for the past 3 weeks just working on my airborne/helo medals. Slowly watching my spm go down down down. I have a good 70 hours still until i'm eligable for Lt General. Give me a good 4-5 hours on karkand, easy 1000 points. So realistically I could have my 200k for rank in 15 hours, but still have to wait 50 something hours of game play to rank... weak!Jim_Bred wrote:
I love infantry only, I cant wait...but it will make the scores greatly increase on those servers.
HAHAHAHAHA this is the most ironic statement of the week. Overcome, sure... lets change the whole game so you noobs who can't handle a vehicle can overcome something...slash_clown wrote:
Adapt and overcome.
Al tho I think Infantry only should NOT be ranked, and therefore not exist, I have No respect for fagots that think its fun to spawn rape people in an uncap area.Samtheman53 wrote:
Yes and proud!-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
So I'm guessing your one of the people who rape the carrier in a J10...
BUT! The people who I'm raping are at unfair advantage as there are people who play on infantry only!!
If you wants INF only, its only because you are to stubborn and stupid to choose a kit (or vehicle) to really over come the threat. This game is not CS, its not UT, its not Quake, its fucking BF2. And there are vehicles, yes those annoying things you cant kill when you medic whoring or trying to be a 1337 sniper. Ever heard of engineer, AT, or Spec ops... or for those Flying things you see so many people kill each other over there's things called stingers and AA vehicles.
Last edited by DrunkFace (2006-08-15 05:24:59)
I'm sorry, some of us come from previous gaming environments like joint operations or unreal tournament, where the ground battles proved to be the *most entertaining*.
and on a side note, perhaps if EA had a clue how to make a snipers guilee suit mesh into his background insted of standing out like a sore thumb, it wouldn't be half bad as a sniper in an armor rich environment. then again they use enemy name tags... they've tried everyway to make this game noob friendly, they are finally paying the community back with something a large # of been asking for.
I'm thinking infantry only 64 man Wake/Clean Sweep/Dalian will end up being a sniper the foolish swimmer-a-thons unless they add loads more boats. Dragon Valley/Zatar are too big and open, spend 3 minutes walking to the next flag only to get snipered, again. Ranked infantry only servers will mostly result in even more annoying stats whoring snipers posting how amazing their K/D ratio is.
Last edited by .:XDR:.PureFodder (2006-08-15 05:46:53)
Yeah, BF2 is the first game I ever played online, I "love" to get killed by vehicles and I never said that I was very good as Infantry. The only thing I wanted to say is that having Infantry only as a ranked mode will make the stats somehow worthless, because you can not compare the circumstances of a battle without vehicles to a battle which is dominated by them. The master of infantry play may be owned very bad in a vehicle battle.fierce wrote:
Your Infantry Stats: "Averages 08:29:27 105 142 0.74 21.49%"Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
People who complain about tanks and jets killing them are too stupid to learn how to fight them. They'd rather abolish vehicles to have an easier game.
I would say nothing against a Infantry Only mode with seperated stats.
Last edited by Mike<Eagle23> (2006-08-15 05:32:31)