I'm not gonna make this about being anti american.. I like America because they saved our (Europe's) bacon in WW1 and WW2.
But I find this initial comment very distrubing... A 3 year war has cost in excess of 300 billion dollars... And the poster thinks that this money could be spent better... Am I getting his/your point correctly ?
If I am, then I think you're either very stupid, or not very good at math. While noone can say for sure EXACTLY how many people live in America.. let's assume that with inflation and what have we, that the war has cost an average of $350 pr american pr year.. or even only looking at the taxpayers only, let's say $1000 pr taxpayer (very high, but for the sake of argument) pr year.....
Do you REALLY think that's to high a price to pay for freedom ? For the lives of countless of Iraqis and other foreign nationals ? For the stability of the middle east ? For the ability to know for sure that your own ALLIES are able to live safely in their homes ? After all, what IS the price on a human life these days ? Apparently, if you're not willing to dish out a few measly dollars to save a guys life, then what do you propose spending the money on ? Better schools you say ? Because it's MUCH nicer to know that your children will grow up with a great education telling them how the American people decided that the cost of war was too high and let their allies die so that a school could buy new books for the students.... Right....
And when it comes right down to it... Did the TAXPAYERS actually PAY that $300 billion ? No... The US has had a HUGE deficit for so many years that today it owes 3/4 of the ENTIRE WORLDS debt ! That's right. The US borrows trillions of dollars to spend on whatever it feels like, so that the taxpayers can live nice cozy lives not worrying about being bombed by dictators like Hussein. And ONE of the things those loans are used for is to finance the war. Do you REALLY think the congress would sit for another term if it agreed to a tax increase of $1000 pr taxpayer to fight this war ? I certainly dont.
Because when it comes right down to it, people like YOU would rather have that money to buy a huge gas guzzling car that gets 5 miles/gallon, and not wonder about where all that oil comes from, or who pays for it. Because if an american pays more than $3 for a gallon of gas (and that's a shocker, after all in 1990 it was only $1 for a gallon), there'd be riots in the streets. Despite the fact that in the rest of the world we pay 2, 3 or even 4 times as much for gas, and we DONT buy SUVs for soccer mom.
There's an old saying.. Someting about throwing the first stone. Consider your situation and living conditions, and consider that of the people you want to deprive of the rights you take for granted. The right to live a decent life, the ability to walk on the street without fear of someone grabbing you and torturing you to death over your religion, race, or political beliefs. If the US wants to control the rest of the world, there's a price to pay. So I dont understand you complaining over a matter of pocket change, when it's not even you paying that money.
I know for a fact that the average American is not stupid. But I also know that as a whole, the american people are blinded by the facts. They rarely see the bigger picture, they trust their superiors to do the right thing for them. The average american apparently doens't like to make tough choices, or think about reality or consequences. Now the Bush administration has decided that the right thing to do was go to war, and you want to PUNISH or CHASTICE the adminstration for serving YOUR instrests ? The very administration that the american public voted into office... A democratic process the Iraqies haven't had the chance to participate in before, by the way.
If you feel cheated, then go vote for someone else next time. Personally, I think Bush did the right thing.
Americans complain about terrorism, and 9/11. But at the same time do not consider the fact that in the rest of the world, terrorism has been an active threat for ages. And the only cure is education, jobs, security and understanding/integration. Do you really think building those comodities and values would be free ? Like I said.. the american way of life has cost the world trillions of dollars over the last century. Do you really think that the countries in Asia and the middle east are capable of paying for the things the US already has, espcially considering what it has cost the americans ? If so, then you are truly short sighted.
The average american can't even tell that the war in Iraq is a battle for regional stability, and that regional stability is a requirement to prevent terrorism from taking root. Terrorism that can easily hit the US (again). Thus the war in Iraq is needed to prevent the next Bin Laden from emerging, blowing up nuclear missle silos, or whatever the next insane guy will do.
There's a price to pay for any advancement. The building of the pyramids costs thousands of lives. The industrialiation of the west has already put a strain on the worlds environment beyond comprehension. Life, liberty and the persuit of happiness cost millions of people their lives during WW2. Why would a war in Iraq be any different ? You should in fact be THANKFUL that today, we HAVE the ability to throw money at a war, an ability that means fewer casualties, more stability, and a better way of life for others.
Had the situation been reversed, and lets say, Taiwan invaded the US, burned the cities, raped the women and gassed millions of people. Tortured, pillaged and killed Americans where they could. How would YOU feel if some moron in say... Australia went "Nah.. we shouldn't help free the americans from oppression, beause then we can't implement a new tax beak for people with private jets !"
Fortunately, I believe that the average american is quite aware of these things, and will not complain about "the cost" of the war in Iraq.
There's an old poem that got a lot of fame after WW2 that goes something like (from memory, I could not find the original work):
When they came for the blacks, I did not speak up for them
When they came for the jews, I did not speak up for them
When they came for the poor, I did not speak up for them
So when they come for me, who is left to speak up for me ?
Last edited by Twist (2006-08-29 17:15:10)