BF2S Forums UK Allowing Muslims to OK Terror Raids? Not Good in any sense.

Last edited by fkin_ (2006-09-26 16:39:58)

[RDH]Warlord wrote:

I don't see much wrong with this.  It's really communication, or the lack of, between the Muslim community and the police that results in bad calls.  And again, it doesn't really sound like they'll ask for that panel will be asked for PERMISSION, but will be brought into the loop of terrorism prevention.  I mean, who'd know them more than themselves?

And as for that 14 people arrested weeks ago, that was all baloney.  I believe half of them didn't even have passports (which I hear take months to get), and the whole idea of liquid explosives is so far fetched that I doubt even a chemist with the know-how and equipment could have blown up a plane as the media made it sound.

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

The guidelines for police offers, according to the paper, include:

    * Rapid entry needs to be the last resort and raids into Muslim houses are discouraged for a number of religious dignity reasons.

    * Police should seek to avoid looking at unclad Muslim women and allow them an opportunity to dress and cover their heads.

    * For reasons of dignity officers should seek to avoid entering occupied bedrooms and bathrooms even before dawn.

    * Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises and may necessitate extensive cleaning of the house and disposal of household items.

    * Advice should be sought before considering the use of cameras and camcorders due to the risk of capturing individuals, especially women, in inappropriate dress.

    * Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.

    * If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.

    * Officers should not take shoes into the houses, especially in areas that might be kept pure for prayer purposes.

    * In the current climate the justification for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.

    * Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch holy books, Qurans or religious artifacts without permission. Where possible, Muslim officers in a state of 'Wudhu' (preparation before prayer) should be used for this purpose.

Youve got to be kidding me.

mafia996630 wrote:

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

The guidelines for police offers, according to the paper, include:

    * Rapid entry needs to be the last resort and raids into Muslim houses are discouraged for a number of religious dignity reasons.

    * Police should seek to avoid looking at unclad Muslim women and allow them an opportunity to dress and cover their heads.

    * For reasons of dignity officers should seek to avoid entering occupied bedrooms and bathrooms even before dawn.

    * Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises and may necessitate extensive cleaning of the house and disposal of household items.

    * Advice should be sought before considering the use of cameras and camcorders due to the risk of capturing individuals, especially women, in inappropriate dress.

    * Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.

    * If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.

    * Officers should not take shoes into the houses, especially in areas that might be kept pure for prayer purposes.

    * In the current climate the justification for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.

    * Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch holy books, Qurans or religious artifacts without permission. Where possible, Muslim officers in a state of 'Wudhu' (preparation before prayer) should be used for this purpose.

You've got to be kidding me.

Source?

going back to your other post, you don't see anything wrong with generalized comments ?also show me the source of the article, for what the FOx news dude said.

mafia996630 wrote:

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

Source?

going back to your other post, you don't see anything wrong with generalized comments ?also show me the source of the article, for what the FOx news dude said.

Worldnetdaily is the source. Why would i post a lie? If you read the article they are trying to make it sound like they want to now respect Hindus also LOL. Yeah Right. The Spin doctors are hard at work trying to stop this train wreck.  The other original Commentary can be found on the Fox news website. Its in Gibsons Comments.

i don't think your lie-ing. i cant find any of them, can you give me a direct link ?

Last edited by <[onex]>Headstone (2006-09-26 21:22:52)

Last edited by JaMDuDe (2006-09-27 08:57:30)

'<[onex wrote:

> Start taking your freedom back instead of letting Tony, and the Muslim movement take YOUR freedoms away.

ghettoperson wrote:

fkin_ wrote:

The BNP is just a political party, no need to be afraid of them. They're just good, peace loving Britons like the rest of us...


A political party, your having a laugh, there just a bunch on racist thugs in suits, who thrive on fear and intimidation. always jumping the bandwagon

they say jump and the british say how high..... and they hate anyone who doesnt have white skin,
extremists in themselves.

racist pricks more like. since when is britain pure bred.

the romans, vikings, normans or whatever europeans, scots welsh all have interbred over the centuries so

there in no one of pure british blood down the tree (bloodline)

Hi, assuming that you were trying to quote me there, I thought you might be interested to know that what I just used there is known as sarcasm; when I say one thing and mean the complete opposite.

I hate the bastards.