BF2S Forums Counter Strike Source

jord wrote:

jermyang wrote:

source sucks, 1.6 is still better, and 1.5 before that.
haha pre-shield days.
and i remember when sniper rifles had crosshairs, sweet.

I was waiting for someone to say that.

1.6 isn't better,it's your opinion.

Here's my opinion,Source has made millions,thousands bought it,and years after it thousands still play it.Oh wait,they're facts.

Sorry to disagree with you m8 but cs 1.6 and cs.s are just as active as eachother .

cs 1,6 for scrims

cs.s for fun


cs 1.6 you can download from steam for about £4

cs.s same as above but about £15-20

i have a server running for cs 1.6 a 16 slot  ip = 85.236.127.17:27018

Darky wrote:

Sarrk wrote:

Darky wrote:

If you look at the stats produced by Steam, more people play 1.6 then Source.

Why are you telling him this? Your telling him your game is better? And what do you hope to achieve from this? Sway him to your game? Not likely, its the internet, everyone is stubborn and will never admit they made a wrong choice on a game, especially if they actually LIKE the game

I like Source, and nothing 1.6 offers will sway me

I <3's teh eyecandy

I also <3's my bullets going where I point my barrel - its that simple

Woah there. Getting a little defensive there, arent we? All I said, was that stats point towards more people preferring 1.6 over Source.

Wouldnt worry about it m8 its only wannabe mod Sarrk haveing a dig ,i understood what you meant and yes according to steam there are more active players on cs1.6. Which is strange because if you look at xfire site it says only by a small margin that source is more active

Sarrk wrote:

Darky wrote:

Sarrk wrote:

Why are you telling him this? Your telling him your game is better? And what do you hope to achieve from this? Sway him to your game? Not likely, its the internet, everyone is stubborn and will never admit they made a wrong choice on a game, especially if they actually LIKE the game

I like Source, and nothing 1.6 offers will sway me

I <3's teh eyecandy

I also <3's my bullets going where I point my barrel - its that simple

Woah there. Getting a little defensive there, arent we? All I said, was that stats point towards more people preferring 1.6 over Source.

Yeah, my bad, Im just sick of the entire 1.6 v Source discussion

When it boils down to it, most people prefer Source because of graphics, and I know I do

Knight - Wow, just wow, drink a leadbased paint will ya?

WoW just wow you still dont understand the steam FACTS that more people play 1.6 then source yet you still say more people prefer source because of the graphics ??If it's about graphics its obivous source owns 1.6 but gameplay and for more active users 1.6 owns it simple nuff said .

Please drink some arsenic

Now now,don't argue on my behalf.

Right.I've got 10 minutes to spare.

So imagine i quoted myself as well as everyone else who so far has quoted me,now imagine that underlined and in bold is were i said CSS is better than Source,impossible,because i didn't.

What i did say[well attepted to] is that Source doesn't suck,not it's better than the 1.6 ,1.5 ,1.4 bf2 or any other game with a decimal number in the title.

Knight,Sharkl lets all have a nice cup of.............






Tea.





You thought i was going to say a nice cup of shut the fuck up,didn't you?