c4 ramming is a real life strategy

2006-10-19 15:17:56

#1

Riddick51PB: Member; +21|6959|Lincoln.ne.us

EA RoE: (f) Using C4 explosives on fast-moving vehicles to destroy other vehicles (C4-ramming) is illegal.

is c4 ramming illegal under EA RoE? why do some server operators determine what iraqi or MEC strats will be?

last i checked, the iraqis prefer c4 ramming.

what is the difference between 1) a heli or a jet taking out a HMMVV vs. 2) c4 ramming a HMMVV?

answer: there isn't any difference between them.

2006-10-19 15:19:00

#2

ddenholm67: DanForth Teh Pwnzer; +53|7007|Scotland

the answer is............stfu.

2006-10-19 15:21:23

#3

kilgoretrout: Member; +53|6921|Little Rock, AR

you're the first person to ever make this point, and probably one of the first few to complain about the ROE...

2006-10-19 15:22:08

#4

ShadowFoX: I Hate Claymores; +109|6982

First of all thats an in-house rule. That means that any server can have it and its not against the ROE like some ridicoulous rules like admins only fly. Therefore if the server doesnt forbid it your not violating the ROE. Second of all. Your an r-tard.

2006-10-19 15:38:33

#5

Riddick51PB: Member; +21|6959|Lincoln.ne.us

ShadowFoX wrote:
Second of all. Your an r-tard.

who are you referring to? there are four people in this thread, using "your" doesn't tell us who you're talking to.

you need to point your comment to the person intended, like this: "ddenholm67, you're a r-tard." otherwise, your comment looks r-tarded, because no one can figure out who it is intended for.

2006-10-19 15:39:14

#6

Ryan: Member; +1,230|7294|Alberta, Canada

What, you can't car bomb anymore?

2006-10-19 15:40:58

#7

kilgoretrout: Member; +53|6921|Little Rock, AR

Riddick51PB wrote:
ShadowFoX wrote:
Second of all. Your an r-tard.
who are you referring to? there are four people in this thread, using "your" doesn't tell us who you're talking to.

you need to point your comment to the person intended, like this: "ddenholm67, you're a r-tard." otherwise, your comment looks r-tarded, because no one can figure out who it is intended for.

No, everyone knew he was calling you an r-tard, Riddick. It was pretty obvious. Well, if you didn't ride the short bus to school, anyway...

2006-10-19 15:41:28

#8

ddenholm67: DanForth Teh Pwnzer; +53|7007|Scotland

Riddick51PB wrote:
ShadowFoX wrote:
Second of all. Your an r-tard.
who are you referring to? there are four people in this thread, using "your" doesn't tell us who you're talking to.

you need to point your comment to the person intended, like this: "ddenholm67, you're a r-tard." otherwise, your comment looks r-tarded, because no one can figure out who it is intended for.

He would be reffering to me why? Everyone that has posted in this thread knew it was for you. So, indeed, stfu.

2006-10-19 16:01:14

#9

TheEternalPessimist: Wibble; +412|7071|Mhz

Riddick51PB wrote:
EA RoE: (f) Using C4 explosives on fast-moving vehicles to destroy other vehicles (C4-ramming) is illegal.

is c4 ramming illegal under EA RoE? why do some server operators determine what iraqi or MEC strats will be?

last i checked, the iraqis prefer c4 ramming.

what is the difference between 1) a heli or a jet taking out a HMMVV vs. 2) c4 ramming a HMMVV?

answer: there isn't any difference between them.

No Jihading isn't illegal under the RoE, the RoE does however give server admins the right to ban it on their server if they wish.

I'm glad it's allowed where i play, keep the tanks on their toes instead of trolling around getting easy kills... Plus i got my vet and expert explosive ordinance badges in the same round on Ji-lalalalalala-had (as I'm now calling it) a couple of days ago

2006-10-19 16:03:51

#10

Executiator: Member; +69|6872

What's with all the pricks getting into the forums? The man asked a decent question, so i think he deserves a decent answer... Not some little 14 yr old faggot bush munching bitch tit to tell him to STFU...

2006-10-19 16:08:24

#11

T1g3r217: Perpetual; +124|6873|My room

Personally, I like C4 ramming. It's like a 1-4-1 a death and a kill; your K/D Ratio is still 1:1

2006-10-19 16:12:02

#12

TheEternalPessimist: Wibble; +412|7071|Mhz

Actually its more like 4:1 if you're doing it right

2006-10-19 16:24:38

#13

l41e: Member; +677|7099

schofield wrote:
Deleted by mod

This is incredibly amusing and ironic.

Go back to first grade.

2006-10-19 16:31:10

#14

l41e: Member; +677|7099

schofield wrote:
Deleted by mod

plus your logic sucks too, "retard" instead of "retard"?

FAIL

Last edited by k30dxedle (2006-10-19 16:32:42)

2006-10-19 16:37:11

#15

TerrorisT²: Melbourne Shuffler; +214|7077|Gold Coast, Australia

Car bombing is 1. Funny 2. Easy 3. Logical (Lose 1 ticket to take out a tank with will take 20 tickets from your team) 4. Your taking 1 for the team.

But i just dont see the point in car bombing (A.K.A. Jihad) a car with only 1 person, if the car your bombing is full, then go for it, or if its an APC or Tank.

See you in the next life...

EDIT: Why dont you just say RETARD instead of R-TARD? Its no faster to type, its like saying teh instead of the... same amount of letters, same letters. It just makes you look either nerdy or dumb so why do people do it?

Last edited by TerrorisT² (2006-10-19 16:40:05)

2006-10-19 16:43:53

#16

Mitch: 16 more years; +877|6976|South Florida

TerrorisT² wrote:
Car bombing is 1. Funny 2. Easy 3. Logical (Lose 1 ticket to take out a tank with will take 20 tickets from your team) 4. Your taking 1 for the team.

But i just dont see the point in car bombing (A.K.A. Jihad) a car with only 1 person, if the car your bombing is full, then go for it, or if its an APC or Tank.

See you in the next life...

EDIT: Why dont you just say RETARD instead of R-TARD? Its no faster to type, its like saying teh instead of the... same amount of letters, same letters. It just makes you look either nerdy or dumb so why do people do it?

Your right dude. it probly takes LONGER to write r-tard then retard cause you have to go all the way up and hit the - key.

15 more years! 15 more years!

BF2S Forums c4 ramming is a real life strategy

ShadowFoX wrote:

Riddick51PB wrote:

ShadowFoX wrote:

Riddick51PB wrote:

ShadowFoX wrote:

Riddick51PB wrote:

schofield wrote:

schofield wrote:

TerrorisT² wrote:

Board footer